Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm having my healthy breasts removed at 22 [not stupid or sick article]
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 1/7/04 | Jon Crowley

Posted on 07/01/2004 6:28:06 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows

A young woman whose mother had her healthy breasts removed after it was found that she carried hereditary cancer genes is to undergo the same operation.

Becky Measures, 22, said she will have a double mastectomy after tests showed that she had a 90 per cent chance of contracting the disease in later life.

Her mother, Wendy Watson, became one of the first women in Britain to have a double mastectomy on healthy breasts.

The decision by Miss Measures, who works as a DJ on Peak 107 FM in Chesterfield, Derbys, is thought to be the first case of a daughter undergoing the same operation as her mother.

She said: "My mother had a double mastectomy 11 years ago although she hadn't got breast cancer and genetic tests at that time were in their infancy.

"It has been a major part of family life since I was very young. My grandmother and great grandmother died from breast cancer. At 22 it was a hard decision to make but I have grown up with it and I have just got to get on with it. My chances of catching breast cancer are minimal at the moment but as time goes on it would get more worrying.

"Before it gets to that stage it is better to get it out of the way. My boyfriend, family and friends are very supportive and it helps that my mum went through with the operation at 38."

She added: "Other family members have contracted breast cancer in their 30s and 40s so I have this large support network and the doctors have been fantastic. The surgeons carry out wonderful breast reconstruction jobs at the same time as the operation and their work is unbelievable.

"I have a lot to live for. This is my way of giving myself a future. A lot of women do not have the opportunity. I see it as a privilege."

Mrs Watson, 49, from Bakewell, Derbys, said: "When I had my double mastectomy it wasn't even recognised that breast cancer could be hereditary.

"When I discovered that nine family members had suffered breast cancer I went to my GP and asked what could be done.

"I had this awful feeling I was waiting to get breast cancer and hoping I had caught it in time."

After her operation, Mrs Watson set up the Genesis Hereditary Breast Cancer Helpline for women.

She has recently sat on a panel for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence developing guidelines for women at high risk of breast cancer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-284 next last
To: Slings and Arrows
My Sister has a high risk of developing breast cancer but I have never heard her even think about such a drastic step as this.
She gets tested every year and I have told her in addition to having a mammogram to also have a ultra sound since cancer can be detected earlier with that rather than the mammogram.
121 posted on 07/01/2004 10:35:21 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
With all the money spent on research we should have better and more preventive cancer treatments out there. To think we are still using this type of surgery and chemo is very disappointing.

Preventive is hard, primarily because there are many different cancerous conformations for a given organ.

All hope is not lost though, as there is a ton of very interesting anti-cancer drug therapies in late stage clinical trials. My girlfriend's father was actually cured of "terminal" late-stage liver cancer (caused by HepC -- wartime blood transfusion) a few years ago with an experimental drug cocktail. Even more interestingly, he was cured of HepC using another experimental biotech drug regimen simultaneously, which is still classified as an incurable disease.

It blows my mind that he was actually cured of two "impossible to cure" diseases simultaneously with advanced experimental biotech. That says to me that we are making some very serious headway. He volunteered to test both therapies because he had nothing to lose. He's been clean of both diseases for a few years now. Some day, the FDA may get around to approving them for general use.

122 posted on 07/01/2004 10:39:17 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
One more time..

This poor girl is suffering from anxiety beyond your comprehension. If she choses to have her breasts removed, and ease her troubled mind and spirit, I say good for her.

It's perfectly acceptable for women to have breast reduction, augmentation or enlargement...so why do we judge someone so harshly who lives in constant mortal fear of Breast Cancer and chooses a mastectomy with reconstruction?

I just don't get it..

sw

123 posted on 07/02/2004 5:51:40 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Why not just kill herself now and just get it over with? Even given her bent for the preventive amputations, I think its crazy to do this before having had the opportunity to nurse children. The timing is bizarre.


124 posted on 07/02/2004 6:04:55 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: krb
The genetic markers for breast cancer are called BRCA-1 and BRCA-2. Only 10% of women who develop breast cancer have them. Nowhere near 90% of women who carry either of these markers develop breast cancer. This is pure hysteria. Breast cancer is NOT the most common cancer in women(lung)and it is NOT the most common cause of death. (cardiovascular disease)

The misguided young lady should keep her breasts and take Taxol as prophyllaxis.

125 posted on 07/02/2004 6:34:34 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (We control the horizontal, We control the vertical, too. We're gonna make a couch potato out of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

Well mayber we finally making some progress then. I stand corrected.


126 posted on 07/02/2004 7:19:31 AM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

There is so many ways to eat right and take other items to prevent cancer. This was a stupid move. She could have started with pray that have been proven to work and will as living a better healthy life style. Some people just don't get that they have more control in their life. The methods are proven.


127 posted on 07/02/2004 7:25:49 AM PDT by bmwcyle (<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

She is a loony-tune. I might get migraines. Off with my head.


128 posted on 07/02/2004 7:26:05 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel

Personal Flotation Devices. Brilliant. :)


129 posted on 07/02/2004 7:32:19 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Liberalism is the end result of too many people peeing in the gene pool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ethrane
Your arrogant and condescending attitude is what gives good physicians bad reputations. Your objectivity is suspect. Your profile indicates you are an anesthesiologist. Thus, your salary is driven by the knife--the more, the merrier.

I can tell you that this surgery is done, here in the US.

You already did--and now you have done so twice. The article states this was one of the first in the U.K. I have seen the facilities and equipment in the U.K. It would give any American healthcare worker pause in its archaic state. I would wager your bedside manner with patients is as bad as your demeaning disposition in this forum.

130 posted on 07/02/2004 7:45:13 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Godspeed to the new Iraqi government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

From now on, her nickname will be "Extreme."


131 posted on 07/02/2004 8:01:07 AM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

Nobody dies of breast cancer, they die when the cancer spreads to a critical organ(s).


132 posted on 07/02/2004 8:04:04 AM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You're going to have a hard time breathing, eating and dating.


133 posted on 07/02/2004 8:09:05 AM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

WESTLEY: "There's a shortage of perfect breasts in this world. It would be a pity to damage yours."


134 posted on 07/02/2004 8:15:18 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

How nice do you have to be to an unconcious person?


135 posted on 07/02/2004 8:15:49 AM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
There is so many ways to eat right and take other items to prevent cancer. This was a stupid move. She could have started with pray that have been proven to work and will as living a better healthy life style. Some people just don't get that they have more control in their life. The methods are proven.

I wonder how many of you, who think this woman is a fool, support circumcision of infants?

136 posted on 07/02/2004 11:08:32 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

apple and oranges dear ---- you are good at red herrings.


137 posted on 07/02/2004 11:18:14 AM PDT by bmwcyle (<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
apple and oranges dear ---- you are good at red herrings.

Really? How so? The most common argument for circumcision is to prevent later problems. That argument is either valid, or it is not. Is it reasonable to remove healthy body parts in the hopes of preventing future health issues?

Some people say circ is reasonable because, although the risk of future problem is low, the procedure is just so darn easy, let's go ahead!

Yet, people complain about this major surgery.

Personally, I think surgery ought to be decided due to medical factors, not ease or difficulty of the procedure.

138 posted on 07/02/2004 11:44:04 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: strictlyaminorleaguer

"Colon cancer is highly treatable, especially if one is checked for it regularly. Breast cancer in young women (20s-30s) is very aggressive and not as easily treated. They aren't comparable forms of cancer."

And of course removing your intestines would be just a tad more radical than breast removal.


139 posted on 07/02/2004 11:54:41 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

"How many women die of incurable breast cancer at very young ages? Is this article even for real?"

A frined of mine lost his wife at age 30 to breast cancer. Very sad. This article is for real, although I don't know that this woman has the right answer.


140 posted on 07/02/2004 11:56:07 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson