Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm having my healthy breasts removed at 22 [not stupid or sick article]
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 1/7/04 | Jon Crowley

Posted on 07/01/2004 6:28:06 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows

A young woman whose mother had her healthy breasts removed after it was found that she carried hereditary cancer genes is to undergo the same operation.

Becky Measures, 22, said she will have a double mastectomy after tests showed that she had a 90 per cent chance of contracting the disease in later life.

Her mother, Wendy Watson, became one of the first women in Britain to have a double mastectomy on healthy breasts.

The decision by Miss Measures, who works as a DJ on Peak 107 FM in Chesterfield, Derbys, is thought to be the first case of a daughter undergoing the same operation as her mother.

She said: "My mother had a double mastectomy 11 years ago although she hadn't got breast cancer and genetic tests at that time were in their infancy.

"It has been a major part of family life since I was very young. My grandmother and great grandmother died from breast cancer. At 22 it was a hard decision to make but I have grown up with it and I have just got to get on with it. My chances of catching breast cancer are minimal at the moment but as time goes on it would get more worrying.

"Before it gets to that stage it is better to get it out of the way. My boyfriend, family and friends are very supportive and it helps that my mum went through with the operation at 38."

She added: "Other family members have contracted breast cancer in their 30s and 40s so I have this large support network and the doctors have been fantastic. The surgeons carry out wonderful breast reconstruction jobs at the same time as the operation and their work is unbelievable.

"I have a lot to live for. This is my way of giving myself a future. A lot of women do not have the opportunity. I see it as a privilege."

Mrs Watson, 49, from Bakewell, Derbys, said: "When I had my double mastectomy it wasn't even recognised that breast cancer could be hereditary.

"When I discovered that nine family members had suffered breast cancer I went to my GP and asked what could be done.

"I had this awful feeling I was waiting to get breast cancer and hoping I had caught it in time."

After her operation, Mrs Watson set up the Genesis Hereditary Breast Cancer Helpline for women.

She has recently sat on a panel for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence developing guidelines for women at high risk of breast cancer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-284 next last
To: Jenya
There is a test to determine with certainty that a person has a 90% chance of getting the disease. If I had those markers, I would elect for a double masectomy. It would trouble me a great deal, but 90% is almost a liklihood.

Have you ever prayed, or have you been too busy idolizing one of your own.

41 posted on 07/01/2004 7:10:58 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Well, sort of, and not really. She's having preventive surgery at 22 for a cancer she doesn't have and may never have. She has a 10% chance of never getting it. Sounds a tad extreme to me. Seems she could hold off until at least the kids are born and nursed.


42 posted on 07/01/2004 7:11:45 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

"Have you ever prayed, or have you been too busy idolizing one of your own."

What are you talking about? I gave my opinion. What does idolizing or praying have to do with this?


43 posted on 07/01/2004 7:12:41 PM PDT by Jenya (Gore, he's a real nowhere man, sitting in his nowhere land, making all his nowhere plans for nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: soozla

"With drastic medical advances being made almost DAILY..."
Regrettably, the overwhelming majority of advances are merely incremental, especially in oncology. Extending patient survival (in late stages) by a few months is counted as a major advance and trumpeted to the max, both in the media and in the stock market. So her choice was either to hope and wait for a revolutionary advance (and who knows when it is coming - exponentially skyrocketing costs of pharmaceutical R&D mean that most of the easy pickings have already been accomplished) or to take a plunge and save herself the trouble of waiting. She chose the latter, and her decision cannot be called irrational.


44 posted on 07/01/2004 7:12:45 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Any Doctor who removes perfectly healthy organs isnt a doctor,...

The Hippocratic oath taken by them may have something to do with that.

45 posted on 07/01/2004 7:13:23 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

10% means one chance in ten of NOT getting it, and as other posters have pointed out, breast cancer is very aggressive - it nearly killed my mother at 30. Assuming that the test is reliable (always a big if, granted), I think her decision is rational, if heartbreaking.


46 posted on 07/01/2004 7:15:06 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
What are you talking about?

Well placed trust.

Where do you place yours?

Sorry for the confusion I have placed upon you.

47 posted on 07/01/2004 7:16:06 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

So you've seen the research?


48 posted on 07/01/2004 7:16:13 PM PDT by BoozeHag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
Very true in this country, but this is from the UK where she has to deal with a socialist medical system, detecting breast cancer even at an early stage may still be a death sentence, if she has to wait years for treatment

Have you thought about what you've just said?
This lady is going to have her breasts removed without having anything wrong with them. They don't DO that on the NHS. (National Health Service). This is a private medical op.

If she can afford to get this done privately. She can afford to get regular breast screening done privately.

Socialist medicare doesn't enter into it.

49 posted on 07/01/2004 7:16:42 PM PDT by Happygal (Le gách dea ghuí)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

"Well placed trust.
Where do you place yours?
Sorry for the confusion I have placed upon you."

What is this, 20 questions? Do me a favor, take me off your loony radar screen.


50 posted on 07/01/2004 7:18:43 PM PDT by Jenya (Gore, he's a real nowhere man, sitting in his nowhere land, making all his nowhere plans for nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

I think I'll have my womb out now, just in case potential great grand children get the 'flu.

One can never be too careful, ye know! ;-)


51 posted on 07/01/2004 7:19:01 PM PDT by Happygal (Le gách dea ghuí)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
I didn't mean to imply I agreed with her getting the operation.

As for the NHS, I am not familiar enough with it to know they would not do this operation.

Thanks for the info

52 posted on 07/01/2004 7:21:11 PM PDT by JZoback ("There's a pony in here somewhere")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

,,, it's good to know that Miss Measures has a good support network.

53 posted on 07/01/2004 7:23:34 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strictlyaminorleaguer
I wouldn't board a plane that had a 90% chance of crashing.

I wouldn't board a plane that has a 10% chance of crashing!

Who does one approach to find the answers to choose the "percentage appropriate" aircraft?

54 posted on 07/01/2004 7:23:40 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

Done


55 posted on 07/01/2004 7:24:58 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel

A small African nation could live in that bikini! *L*


56 posted on 07/01/2004 7:25:28 PM PDT by Happygal (Le gách dea ghuí)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
This girl had a time bomb on board...She chose to defuse it, rather than have it go off.

sw

57 posted on 07/01/2004 7:26:02 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
A small African nation could live in that bikini!

,,, I was kind of living in the hope that I was further up the pecking order than any of the nations you had in mind.

58 posted on 07/01/2004 7:27:28 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel

You are a sick, sick man! ;-)

Maybe you should think about having that removed! *LOL* ;-)


59 posted on 07/01/2004 7:28:59 PM PDT by Happygal (Le gách dea ghuí)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
You are a sick, sick man! ;-)

,,, thanx for the quick recognition.

60 posted on 07/01/2004 7:31:21 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson