Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Effective Way to Prevent Terrorism is missing from 9-11 Report, Libertarians Say
Libertarian Party Newspaper ^ | 7-22-04 | George Getz

Posted on 07/22/2004 1:49:15 PM PDT by SmithPatterson

Most effective way to prevent terrorism

is missing from 911 report, Libertarians say

WASHINGTON, DC -- The report by the September 11 commission is missing

one obvious way the U.S. government could reduce the chance of another

terrorist attack, Libertarians say: Quit meddling in foreign nations.

"The intelligence reform needed most right now is a more intelligent

foreign policy," says Libertarian presidential candidate Michael

Badnarik. "Pulling U.S. troops out of nations where they don't belong

would make America much safer than appointing a thousand new

intelligence czars."

The report by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the

United States, released on Thursday in Washington, notes that the

government missed up to 10 opportunities to unravel the September 11

plot because of bureaucratic bungling among 15 U.S. intelligence

agencies. It recommends creating a new multi-agency center to fight

terrorism; appointing a single director of national intelligence; and

strengthening congressional oversight of intelligence agencies.

Unfortunately, the politicians who authored the 600-page report chose to

overlook the simplest way to protect America, Badnarik says: Adopt a

foreign policy of neutrality and non-intervention.

"Most Americans would be shocked to learn that U.S. troops are deployed

in more than 100 nations around the globe," he said. "Putting U.S.

troops in volatile, anti-American regions such as the Middle East makes

them tempting targets for terrorists."

In fact, terrorists attacked several U.S. targets -- such as the USS

Cole and the World Trade Center -- before the catastrophic events of

September 11, and each time made it clear that they were reacting to

U.S. foreign policy in the region.

"You don't see terrorists targeting other prosperous, Western-style

democracies such as Switzerland, Canada or Sweden," he said. "And one

reason is that those governments don't meddle in other nation's affairs

or embark on foolish nation-building missions."

For decades, he noted, the U.S. government has provided military and

financial aid to both Israel and its Arab enemies, has sided both with

Iran and Iraq in their bitter, 10-year war and has routinely supported

and armed brutal dictatorships around the world -- so politicians

shouldn't pretend that they're shocked when Americans become targets for

terrorists.

That's why the biggest missed opportunity of all is the government's

refusal to reform U.S. foreign policy, Libertarians say.

"Instead of making America safer, Republicans and Democrats have opted

once again to make government bigger," he said. "When will they learn

that the best way to protect Americans at home is to quit making enemies

abroad?"


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 911commissionreport; badnarik; libertarianparty; lp; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 07/22/2004 1:49:17 PM PDT by SmithPatterson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

That was a real good strategy back in the 1800's, before there were nuclear submarines, airplanes, and long-range missles.


2 posted on 07/22/2004 1:51:38 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
"Pulling U.S. troops out of nations where they don't belong would make America much safer than appointing a thousand new intelligence czars."

Only a childish, dope-addled mind could produce such a policy.

3 posted on 07/22/2004 1:52:05 PM PDT by Petronski (Nobody "inadvertently" takes sensitive docs in their pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I somehow doubt that taking all our troops out of the Middle East will make the Muslim Extremists stop hating us.


4 posted on 07/22/2004 1:52:22 PM PDT by RockinRight (Liberalism IS the status quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

It's getting harder and harder to be a Libertarian these days.


5 posted on 07/22/2004 1:53:03 PM PDT by GSWarrior (This tagline conveys the heart and soul of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

This is why I'm a small-l libertarian instead of a Large-L one.


6 posted on 07/22/2004 1:54:10 PM PDT by George Smiley (It amazes me how easily John Kerry can straddle both sides of the fence for any given issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
If I weren't home, and a bad guy busted into my place, and my wife was being raped, and my kids beaten...as a prelude to being killed, would my Libertarian neighbor meddle?

I know my dog would be safe...the other neighbor's PETA.

7 posted on 07/22/2004 1:55:00 PM PDT by dasboot (<img src="XXX">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

Once more confirmed that Libertarians are juvenile fools.


8 posted on 07/22/2004 1:56:42 PM PDT by dennisw (Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
If one votes Libertarian, they might as well vote for John F'ing Kerry.

Actually, when it comes to foreign policy, the two don't seem to be too far off.

9 posted on 07/22/2004 1:57:24 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Confirmed again, Losertarians are Moore-ons!


10 posted on 07/22/2004 1:59:30 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

I agree with many Libertarian positions, but this is not one of them. It's also why we must never elect one to the Presidency.


11 posted on 07/22/2004 2:00:16 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

Who cares what these lamebrains think?


12 posted on 07/22/2004 2:02:50 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies: foreign and domestic RATmedia agree Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I have always found it hilarious that whenever you confront a libertarian about his ridiculous views on defense his stock answer is to say, "Ever heard of Vietnam ?", apparently implying that a militia is all that is needed.

Hey, the NVA and Viet Cong paid a horrendous human cost for their victory. They lived in tunnels and caves in the Iron Triangle for ten years. Would libertarians live in tunnels and caves for ten minutes ? Would people imbued with the philosophy that they don't owe anyone anything suffer and sacrifice and die the way the NVA and Viet Cong did ?


13 posted on 07/22/2004 2:03:02 PM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

LOL! That what I was thinking!!! ;)


14 posted on 07/22/2004 2:03:21 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson; nopardons; OldFriend; Texasforever; Miss Marple; Howlin; rintense

15 posted on 07/22/2004 2:03:24 PM PDT by VaBthang4 (He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

LOL


16 posted on 07/22/2004 2:03:51 PM PDT by VaBthang4 (He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I feel the same way about republicans.


17 posted on 07/22/2004 2:04:04 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (/"Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

"Instead of making America safer, Republicans and Democrats have opted once again to make government bigger,"


True Statement


18 posted on 07/22/2004 2:06:19 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

And they wonder why the mainstream considers Libertarians kooks and flakes.

This is without question, one of the stupidest articles I have ever read.

Cheers,

knews hound


19 posted on 07/22/2004 2:11:30 PM PDT by knews_hound (Out of the NIC ,into the Router, out to the Cloud....Nothing but 'Net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I agree with many Libertarian positions, but this is not one of them. It's also why we must never elect one to the Presidency.

I agree completely. This guy's Presidential campaign site is a nutjob wishlist for campaign positions - everything from recognizing the "secret Constitutional amendment" to treating 9/11 as merely a criminal matter for the Manhattan district attorney's office to investigate.

Besides, the most effective way to prevent terrorism is converting to Islam and submitting to Sharia law and the rule of the successors of the Prophet. That's what our enemies want, and the only thing that will satisfy them. The Libertarians don't want to believe that's true, and I can't really blame them for wishing that it wasn't so. But the rest of us have to live in the real world.

20 posted on 07/22/2004 2:13:34 PM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (I voted Libertarian once. Then I got a clue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson