Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nasa rethinks probe to the Sun
BBC News On Line ^ | July 22, 2004 | By Paul Rincon, BBC News Online science staff, in Paris

Posted on 07/25/2004 4:00:40 PM PDT by aculeus

A mission to put an orbiting spacecraft around the Sun may get a second chance, after being rejected by the US space agency five years ago.

A positive assessment of the proposal by the National Research Council has renewed interest at Nasa.

So the team behind the idea is working on another study to examine how such a mission might be carried out.

A new vision for "Solar Probe" was outlined by the project's team at a space exploration conference in Paris.

But building a spacecraft that can survive repeated flybys of the Sun poses significant challenges.

"In order to go close to the Sun and make measurements, you have to deal with the incredible heat that you have there," said team member David J McComas, of the Southwest Research Institute in Texas, US.

"There's something like 2.4 megawatts on a reasonable-sized shield.

"Most of it is radiated out into space, but you still have kilowatts of power that you have to get rid of in other ways," he told the Committee on Space Research (Cospar) scientific assembly.

Sun's corona

The probe would carry a suite of instruments to examine particles and radiation emitted by the star.

It would also investigate the Sun's corona, magnetic field, and internal phenomena such as solar plumes.

Solar Probe might have a type of periscope that could take a safe portion of the Sun's light into the spacecraft for readings to be made.

Proposals for solar probe missions in the US go back as far as 1958. Over the years, many spacecraft designs have been put forward, but they can largely be grouped into two categories: the "dunce cap" and the "parabola".

The dunce cap is conical, to provide a large surface area. The parabola features a large heat shield and an antenna.

The definition team will also be adjusting the project outline to fit the current political climate.

"Nasa is currently pretty risk-averse, so we can't take too many risks. This has to be as low-risk as you can make a mission to go within four or five solar radii of the Sun," said Dr McComas.

The earliest the craft could launch is 2010.

© BBC MMIV


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: classygreeneyedblond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
SPF: Infinity?
1 posted on 07/25/2004 4:00:41 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I hope they go during daytime when it much brighter and easier to find.


2 posted on 07/25/2004 4:05:28 PM PDT by Blue Screen of Death (/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death

The more important thing is that they go during winter, when it's cooler.


3 posted on 07/25/2004 4:11:20 PM PDT by sharktrager (The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And the paving contractor lives in Chappaqua.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
A spacecraft orbiting the Sun? What an idea. A spacecraft parked on the launching pad at Cape Canaveral is orbiting the Sun.

Hell, I've orbited the Sun myself, a few dozen times. Ain't much to it.

4 posted on 07/25/2004 4:11:34 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (Past performance is no guarantee of future results... I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death

No, they're going to land at night! :-)


5 posted on 07/25/2004 4:11:45 PM PDT by hometoroost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I hope someone can make a nice referigeration laser or this thing is going to cook.


6 posted on 07/25/2004 4:15:22 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Many a law, many a commandment have I broken, but my word never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

GEEZ ... you people are sooooooo dumb to think that going to the sun at night will make a differance ... every body knows that in order to land on the sun you have to do it during a full eclipse


7 posted on 07/25/2004 4:16:25 PM PDT by clamper1797 (This Vietnam Vet ain't Fonda Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

They should have a lander like the Mars rovers. That would be really interesting if it landed and was crawling around the surface and suddenly got blown 50 million miles into space by a coronal plume.


8 posted on 07/25/2004 4:18:17 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797; All

IMHO, they should target large bodies of water!


9 posted on 07/25/2004 4:32:13 PM PDT by olde north church (<a href="http://www.trentonrevlution.com">trentonrevolution</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: olde north church
edit, oh yeah:
and DEFINITELY NOT THE EQUATOR!
10 posted on 07/25/2004 4:33:10 PM PDT by olde north church (<a href="http://www.trentonrevlution.com">trentonrevolution</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

That'll never work either. They should try landing on the North pole of the sun because its not quite as hot.


11 posted on 07/25/2004 4:38:07 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
A refrigerator laser. What an Uplifting idea!
12 posted on 07/25/2004 4:53:17 PM PDT by 75thOVI (I need a sheep to keep me warm through the night!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death

....go during the day but wear sunglasses! Sheesh, and I'm not even a rocket scientist!


13 posted on 07/25/2004 4:56:07 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (After 30+ years dealing with idiots, I still haven't earned the right to just shoot them.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Remember the Unknown Comic's impression of the first man landing on the sun? "Ouch...ooch...ouch...ooo!"


14 posted on 07/25/2004 4:59:49 PM PDT by fat city (Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Like moths to a flame...


15 posted on 07/25/2004 5:02:34 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

no way go when its cloudy


16 posted on 07/25/2004 5:03:20 PM PDT by al baby (Boy oh Boy I stuned my Beeber this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death
hope they go during daytime when it much brighter and easier to find.

But the big problem is the heat. If they go at night they will have less heat problems.

17 posted on 07/25/2004 5:04:40 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Four words:
Solar powered air conditioner.

18 posted on 07/25/2004 5:05:53 PM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Duh, you slather the satellite with Coppertone and it's good to go.

Aerospace engineers are SO overpaid.

19 posted on 07/25/2004 5:06:25 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Will Spike Lee and Rosie O'Donnell be on board?


20 posted on 07/25/2004 5:26:41 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>stupid blob</A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson