Posted on 8/2/2004, 2:51:06 PM by crazycat
BRITAIN’S intelligence agencies have been ordered by the prime minister to look into alleged French profiteering from the discredited United Nations scheme which allowed Saddam Hussein’s regime to sell oil in return for food.
Intelligence sources say both MI5 and MI6, the home and overseas spy agencies, are gathering information on French businesses which benefited from the scheme.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
BRITAIN’S intelligence agencies have been ordered by the prime minister to look into alleged French profiteering from the discredited United Nations scheme which allowed Saddam Hussein’s regime to sell oil in return for food.
Intelligence sources say both MI5 and MI6, the home and overseas spy agencies, are gathering information on French businesses which benefited from the scheme.
It is understood that Tony Blair is keen to discover whether the French government’s strong opposition to the Iraq war may have been partly to defend its businesses’ financial links with Saddam’s regime.
At the centre of the intelligence service’s inquiries is likely to be BNP Paribas, the French bank which administered the programme on behalf of the UN.
More than $40 billion (£22 billion) of Iraqi oil money passed through the bank’s New York branch in the six years before the war. The contract was originally handled by BNP bank before it merged with Paribas, another French bank, in 2000.
Among those to profit indirectly from the contract was Nadhmi Auchi, a British-based businessman who is 34th in The Sunday Times Rich List with a personal fortune of £898m.
Auchi, who lives in a mansion in Kingston upon Thames, southwest London, owns shares in BNP Paribas through his company General Mediterranean Holdings (GMH). He was previously a significant shareholder in Paribas, had a place on a shareholder committee and was an influential figure in the merger of the two banks.
The UN oil-for-food programme allowed Saddam to trade oil to buy food and other humanitarian supplies.
The reputation of the programme has been undermined by a string of allegations that bribes and backhanders were routinely paid to Saddam and his henchmen for oil contracts. Saddam is also alleged to have used the oil-for-food scheme to “buy” political influence around the world.
Such is the controversy that the UN, the US Senate and the Iraqi government are all carrying out their own inquiries into how the oil money was used.
The intelligence gathered by British spy agencies may also be used to influence UN reforms which are being discussed following the fallout from the war in Iraq.
A source said: “Tony Blair wants to demonstrate and understand the forces behind decisions in the security council to prevent problems in future. The whole mechanism of the UN oil-for-food scheme was a wonderful economic opportunity for some countries.”
In answer to a recent parliamentary question about the oil-for-food scheme, Blair said: “One thing that will happen under the new Iraqi government is that there will be a great uncovering of what took place. It will be very educative to allow people to see just how much corruption there was inside Iraq and to see the links between what happened inside Iraq and outside.”
The role of BNP Paribas has recently come under increased scrutiny. Last week, investigators for the Manhattan district attorney were in London making inquiries. The district attorney has launched a criminal investigation into alleged “improper banking practices” at BNP Paribas over the oil-for-food accounts.
The bank was responsible for issuing “letters of credit” to guarantee payments by companies, governments and individuals trading with Iraq through the UN scheme. It also converted the money between different currencies and invested the deposits which funded the oil-for-food deals.
The size of the funds flowing through the bank would potentially have made the contract extremely profitable and the UN would have been one of the bank’s biggest customers, according to accountants.
Documents unearthed in Baghdad and interviews with officials at the Iraqi central bank since the fall of Saddam have raised serious questions about the conduct of some officials in the French bank.
When the oil-for-food programme began, the UN provided the central bank with internal audit reports for the first phases of the scheme. One insider said: “These reports raised serious questions about what had happened to interest earned on the account, what exchange rates the bank was offering on currency transactions and whether the money was being efficiently handled.”
By 2000 the Iraqis had become so concerned that they asked the UN for the money to be split among several banks, but the organisation vetoed the plan. Investigators are now trying to determine if BNP Paribas acted improperly or whether political pressure was brought within the UN to ensure that it kept the contract.
Separately, the US Congress has subpoenaed all records on the bank’s UN accounts for its own inquiry. The bank says that it was simply acting on UN orders. The new Iraqi government is also attempting to ascertain exactly what happened to the oil-for-food cash.
Auchi, a former Iraqi oil ministry official who moved to Britain in the 1980s and has reportedly advised the prime minister on the reconstruction of Iraq, says he played no role in the BNP Paribas oil-for-food deals.
His spokesman said last week: “Neither Mr Auchi nor GMH was involved directly or indirectly in the UN oil- for-food programme. He only knew about the programme from what was published in the media.
“Mr Auchi has always believed that the UN oil-for-food programme could have been better thought out, organised and operated.”
Auchi, 67, moves in powerful circles and has cultivated close relationships within the Labour party. He once employed Keith Vaz, the former Europe minister, as a director of his holding company. Lord Sainsbury, the science minister, arranged for a painting to be given to him to celebrate the 20th anniversary of his firm.
It was signed by 130 MPs, including Blair.
However, last November the businessman was fined £1.4m and received a 15-month suspended sentence in France for receiving illegal commissions from Elf, the oil firm.
He has extensive hotel, banking, construction and aviation interests in the Middle East. Another company in which he has a significant stake, Orascom, won a contract to provide a mobile phone network in Iraq after the war. But American officials now allege that the firm paid bribes of more than $10m to secure this deal.
Auchi says he is a passive investor in the firm, had nothing to do with the mobile phone contract and is unaware of any wrongdoing.
Yesterday BNP Paribas declined to comment on the specific allegations but said: “Under its contract with the United Nations, BNP Paribas provides non-discretionary banking services to the oil- for-food programme and in so doing acts upon the instructions of the UN.
“It is understandable, given the publicity surrounding the UN oil-for-food programme, that US authorities would wish to understand details about the programme. As is customary, BNP Paribas will fully co- operate with the authorities.”
A spokesman for the UN said: “We have an independent investigation looking into all the allegations. We have no objections to BNP Paribas releasing documents to those who have subpoenaed the information.”
France is the enemy - France has always been the enemy.
ping
Let's hear it for MI6!
don't forget, Mrs. Heinz owned a chunk of this bank's stock...NO KETCHUP FOR OIL!
Thanks, crazycat. France and the UN, Kerry's lodestars.
Oh ... goody ... goody! Another investigation.
And they will do exactly what?
The same thing they did with the Senate "memogate". Nothing!
The same as they did with the purloined FBI files Clinton had stashed in the closet. Nothing!
The same as they will do to Sandy Berger for theft of documents. Nothing!
We are no longer a nation of laws, so I guess it doesn't matter.
And you still ask why they say France stinks.
It's payback time.
...Because they would never PRESUME to never question the integrity or motives of the UN. Especially since their candidate wants to turn the running of the US military over to it.
Excellent news!
Thanks for publishing this.
This is interesting that both MI5 and MI6 are involved.
This link shows the role of MI5:
http://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page18.html
This link shows the role of MI6:
http://www.five.org.uk/security/mi6org/
It appears to me that not only are the French being investigated by MI6, also, Brits are being investigated by MI5 for their involvement with the French.
Put me on a ping list when more of this comes out.
Thanks!
Besides all the illegal kickbacks and chicanery, it is important to understand that the UN charged an administrative fee to run the program. I believe it was 3% of all sales. The UN had an institutional motive for keeping the program going even if it meant keeping Saddam in power. There are a lot of people in high places who want to keep this story quiet. I doubt if we will ever find out the true story.
Ping.
You are so correct:
-"“Mr Auchi has always believed that the UN oil-for-food programme could have been better thought out, organised and operated.”-
Oh, gee, that sounds like a political solution in the making. Nuttin'.
Goody.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.