Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH BY A LANDSLIDE
National Review (The Corner) ^ | 8-3-04 | Peter Robinson

Posted on 08/03/2004 7:02:20 AM PDT by veronica

BUSH BY A LANDSLIDE

A Yale economist, Ray Fair has constructed a model that predicts the outcome of presidential elections using economic data alone. The model’s predictive power? As good as that of any model and better than that of most.

What does the Fair model predict for 2004? Bush will win in a landslide, capturing more than 57 percent of the vote. To see for yourself, click here...

Presidential Vote Equation
The following paper presents the November 1, 2002, update of the vote equation. No specification changes were made for this update from the previous update (in November 1998), which itself was unchanged from the update before that. The equation was simply reestimated using the latest data. This paper also contains the first prediction for 2004 using the 2002 update.
November 2002 update paper and the November 1, 2002, prediction

Compute your own prediction for 2004 using the 2002 update

Predictions for 2004 using 2002 update:
January 30, 2003, prediction
April 25, 2003, prediction
July 31, 2003, prediction
October 31, 2003, prediction
February 5, 2004, prediction
April 29, 2004, prediction
July 31, 2004, prediction

Earlier update papers:
1982
1988
1990
1996
1998

Original paper:
1978

Non technical discussion:
Predicting Presidential Elections and Other Things (Chapters 1, 3, and 4)

Old site material for the 2000 election

Note to the Media: July 31, 2004



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gwb2004; landslide; predictions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2004 7:02:20 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veronica

What was the prediction in 2000?


2 posted on 08/03/2004 7:04:11 AM PDT by Republican Red (Is that a classified document in your pants Sandy or are you just glad to see me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales

FYI...


3 posted on 08/03/2004 7:04:15 AM PDT by veronica (Hate-triotism, the religion of leftists, liberals, anti-semites, and other cranks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I don't need an economist's model to tell me Bush will win by a good margin.

I just open by eyes and ears to the non-filtered, non-biased news and it's clear.

4 posted on 08/03/2004 7:04:58 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

But Zogby says Bush should start packing his bags and reserve a U-Haul for November.


5 posted on 08/03/2004 7:05:19 AM PDT by mlbford2 (Sorry for spelling errors, I'm a product of a state university)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

The "click here" link will take you to the page with the hot links.


6 posted on 08/03/2004 7:05:37 AM PDT by veronica (Hate-triotism, the religion of leftists, liberals, anti-semites, and other cranks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

Ping.


7 posted on 08/03/2004 7:05:45 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

But does it factor in people being brainwashed by Michael Moore and the liberal media? Wild-card.


8 posted on 08/03/2004 7:05:54 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Bush will win in a landslide, capturing more than 57 percent of the vote.

A landslide of 57%? I've never heard it referred to as a landslide before.

9 posted on 08/03/2004 7:05:55 AM PDT by Old Sarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
A:"The election is thus predicted to be close, with an edge for the Republicans."
10 posted on 08/03/2004 7:06:37 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

"The actual outcome was that Gore received 50.3 percent of the two party vote. The last prediction on this site (October 27, 2000), which used actual values for all the economic variables, was that Gore would receive 50.8 percent of the two party vote. The error is thus 0.5 percentage points. The standard error of the equation is 2.15 percentage points, and so the actual error is well within one standard error. The presidential vote equation thus did extremely well."


11 posted on 08/03/2004 7:06:42 AM PDT by veronica (Hate-triotism, the religion of leftists, liberals, anti-semites, and other cranks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I started out thinking this election would be a Bush by a landslide win. Then i became much less sure and even worried that Bush could lose this one. Now I'm back to thinking it will be a Bush win by a fair margin of at least 10%.


12 posted on 08/03/2004 7:07:34 AM PDT by cripplecreek (John kerry is unbalanced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Not sure if this will bear out this time with other concerns skewing the mindset of the electorate....Then again, I'm still expecting a clear Bush win.
13 posted on 08/03/2004 7:08:17 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

America is not going to elect a metrosexual gigolo. He is a faux war hero. A faux man. A pompous windbag. A liar and a hypocrite. Kerry will go down with a bang and cry when he falls.


14 posted on 08/03/2004 7:09:15 AM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Kerry by 2%

Too many folks are buying his "nuance" BS.


15 posted on 08/03/2004 7:11:09 AM PDT by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
A landslide of 57%? I've never heard it referred to as a landslide before.

That's a 14 point spread in a two-way race. That is a landslide.

16 posted on 08/03/2004 7:12:09 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: veronica
ELECTION 2004, Things liberals need to know:


17 posted on 08/03/2004 7:12:20 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Bush is Hell on liberals and terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

I agree, atomicpossum. This electoral cycle promises to be unusual. Bush should win, but not with 57% of the popular vote.


18 posted on 08/03/2004 7:12:31 AM PDT by Bonaventure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I only see one issue in this election. Who will win Ohio.


19 posted on 08/03/2004 7:12:35 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("John Kerry does not want to lead this country, he wants to be president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

George Bush won a landslide in 1988 and got 53.4% of the vote. In 1984 Reagan won 58 to 40% and it was the biggest landslide in history. I would consider anything over 53% for GW a Kerry ass-whoopin'.


20 posted on 08/03/2004 7:13:14 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson