Posted on 08/03/2004 10:07:35 AM PDT by Smogger
She was bleeding heavily after having sex with another guy.
That's the only way to explain Mr. X's DNA being in her and not on Kobe.
As much as she had on her, if it had been there when she claims he attacked her, he would have been covered in it.
The DA knew about this for months! IT frosts me.
I agree. As soon as I heard that she was wearing underwear with more than one man's semem on it when she showed up to be examined, that was it for me.
I can't believe a juror would convict Kobe knowing this.
She obviously bled when with Kobe.
There is absolutely NO way to know that for sure; that's the problem when you have sex with somebody after an incident you claim was rape.
For all we know, she wasn't bleeding after Kobe, and was after Mr. X.
And because they won't be able to prove which is the truth, this case is over.
Her blood is on his shirt.
If she did. I've always said I would not convict if she did because of the many questions and implications it obviously raises. As far as I can see, it is far from demonstrated she was with someone after Bryant.
see posts above about sperm sequence. Much more of mr 'x's
And one more point before I abandon this topic again...for all the snickering over her hygiene, I notice Bryant still had HER on HIM over 24 hours later. Didn't he shower? Also was wearing the stained shirt he had worn during the encounter, whether it was consensual or not.
He doesn't appear to be the cleanest person, either.
A miniscule amount, not what they are talking about now.
And that microscopic "tear" couldn't account for all that?
Knew what?
No joke. She really said that.
It goes against one's intuitive reaction, and everything else I've heard from married rape victims, who often shun their husbands for a long time.
I don't believe a jury would buy this story.
I read the actual testimony from the expert. I'll take transcripts over posts every time. I know she's a defense expert and I'll wait for other side.
that his case was bogus, he quit the case. please read whole thread. The prosecution is dog meat
I frankly don't believe she had sex after the Bryant encounter. I'll be stunned if she did and would think that would be the end of the case. But I don't think she did.
Then how do you explain the fact that her DNA and Kobe's DNA were found on Kobe, but not Mr. X's?
Because if the sex was before Kobe, it stands to reason that if it was still in her the day of the rape exam, then it was in her when she claims Kobe raped her.
I read the whole thread.
LOL
Obviously the DA does not think his case is "bogus".
Who said he was?
But at least he only had the DNA of one person on him.
The prosecutor claims transfer and I'll wait for the entire testimony.
You would concede if the donor was not physically with her after she was with Bryant and that is proven, the question you pose is moot, true?
My husband watched her in stunned silence
and had two words for her assertions. B.S.
The research she noted was likely bogus, like
some of the obviously weighted polling data.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.