Posted on 08/07/2004 1:36:44 PM PDT by wagglebee
I think Jimmy Carter is one of Kofi Annan's leftist idiots.
Someone please tell me this is NOT true!
Yeah, I guess you're right.
It won't be the UN. FOX news said that there would be some UN personell but the group is part of a European watchdog group.
Actually it's kind of interesting that he's doing it at all. It tells me that the president is expecting some dirty tricks and is heading the democrats off.
You know since it's always the rats which are cheating this could be a politically smart move on the administrations part.
I would love to see some of the rats operatives busted by the UN for voter fraud.
It is called pre-emption. Now Kerry can only agree...he cant take a stand without saying that he does not think that the election should be monitored which we all know he wont and cant.
Good move by the Prez....
It's the democrats that do the election fraud thing...this is maybe a smart move; less room for them to shriek down the line. Also, maybe even a little less possibility for 'Rat shenanigans.
What if the RATS pay off the UN watchdogs? TerAYsa has a bottomless purse, and God knows the Euroweenies want Kerry to win.
And being asked makes it non-intervention?
The UN members lick their chops at ANY opportunity to get a hand in the pants of the US' business.
Bloggers, other non-establishment media, and concerned citizens should subject the individual backgrounds of these "impartial" Euros to a comprehensive investigation. Business ties to Castro, Saddam, or Soros should be special objects of attention, as should membership in fifth column dhimmi-groups ("Doctors without Borders" etc.) and ties to the enemy media (Reuters, Al-Jazeerah, the British National Union of Journalists, etc.).
Especially in Chicago where even dead Democrats vote over and over.
They should be allowed to stand over the folks counting ballots and do random cross checks to ensure no dead people vote, only eligible people vote, and only once in one balloting place.
I wonder how many votes the Rats would lose if EVERYTHING were fair and proper?
As corrupted as many elections have become worlwide, it would be a good idea to have disinterested parties supervising every election.
Well said -- and, unfortunately, true.
How dangerously ironic that these people slam the idea of the US courts getting involved, questioning their purpose in doing so in '00 but fully welcome foreigners with open arms to do the same.
Politics in this country of ours is more ominous than one can perceive.
Hillary's rather frequent visits to Europe are paying off.
I don't care how the media spins this, this is the UN. Go to the UN website and click on human rights, then search OCSE and ODIHR. These organizations are just special elections departments of the UN.
Then you better not vote I guess.
Would one be totally out of line in thinking that Dubya responding to this with a "Cram it where the sun don't shine for our elections are none of your business" would be more appropriate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.