Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jamestown Police confiscate 500 to 1,000 guns
WKBW-TV ^ | August 5, 2004

Posted on 08/08/2004 2:03:04 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR

In Jamestown, police say one resident had enough firepower in his house, to equip a small army.

Officers confiscated somewhere between five hundred and a thousand guns from the home of 63-year-old Thad Schank. He faces a weapons possession charge. Police also say one of Schank's weapons was stolen a couple months ago, which means it's somewhere out on the streets. When police realized just how many guns Schank had, they decided to get them out of his home, so that no more guns would end up in the hands of criminals.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: athousandguns; banglist; confiscated; enoughfirepower; equipasmallarmy; fivehundred; grandtheft; gungrabbers; is1000enough; justright; larceny; needs; notenough; ripoff; stolenbypolice; thieves; toofew; toomany; weaponspossession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
Having "too many" guns is a crime now?
1 posted on 08/08/2004 2:03:05 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

He obviously took "one gun a month" literally.


2 posted on 08/08/2004 2:07:47 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

It's only too many when you run out of room in the gun cabinet.Molon Labe.


3 posted on 08/08/2004 2:12:42 AM PDT by SirLurkedalot (God bless our Veterans!!! And God bless America!!! Molon Labe,F***ers!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
Police also say one of Schank's weapons was stolen a couple months ago, which means it's somewhere out on the streets. When police realized just how many guns Schank had, they decided to get them out of his home, so that no more guns would end up in the hands of criminals.

ONE out of 500-1,000 was stolen. If a crook wanted to commit a crime, don't you think he'd take a couple?

If the police provided more security in his neighborhood, perhaps the theft would not have happened. But rather than protect citizens from criminals, the police would rather disarm the public "in their best interest".

4 posted on 08/08/2004 2:12:56 AM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee; TERMINATTOR
ONE out of 500-1,000 was stolen.

According to what I read in the article, they were *all* stolen. ;)

5 posted on 08/08/2004 2:15:56 AM PDT by explodingspleen (When life gets complex, multiply by the complex conjugate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: explodingspleen

bttt


6 posted on 08/08/2004 2:19:33 AM PDT by notforhire (It riles them to believe that we perceive the web they weave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR; Joe Brower
Having "too many" guns is a crime now?
I'd love to see "the law" in black and white that this person is supposed to have broken.

Police also say one of Schank's weapons was stolen a couple months ago, which means it's somewhere out on the streets. or in the evidence room and a paper backtrack brought you to the front door of the owner months after it was "stolen"? too little information in the article such as was a complaint filed etc.
And ya know, I'm sitting here wondering how did only one gun get stolen? With that many around it would've been a smorgasbord, a virtual "Gunsmoke Buffet", to a thief. Something wrong in this picture.

When police realized just how many guns Schank had, they decided to get them out of his home, so that no more guns would end up in the hands of criminals.
The ends justifying the means and the number of guns, some eventual day, will not be relevant.

7 posted on 08/08/2004 2:20:40 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

For the Left, ONE is having too many, and a crime.

Unless you are a celebrtiy, a US Senator from California, an approved cop on a Liberal police force....


8 posted on 08/08/2004 2:51:26 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

With all due respect, this blurb is little more than a typical local TV teaser. Diesigned to incite, upset, and get the reader to "stay tuned".


9 posted on 08/08/2004 3:06:01 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Diesigned?
Designed will work also. ;)


10 posted on 08/08/2004 3:08:03 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

Ok, I hope the government lets me know what the legal limit is. Also, what constitutes an arsenal versus a collection, and how many men make up a small army? This is so freaking bogus. I hope when this is over he sues these officers. They must be breaking many laws, not to mention violating his constitutional rights.


11 posted on 08/08/2004 3:10:23 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Hope you're right.


12 posted on 08/08/2004 3:11:35 AM PDT by Free Trapper (ALF & ELF - Future Bog People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

can anyone explain why it is illegal to own a whole bunch of weaons?
What would be considered too many to go from legal posession to illegal posession?
Do I need to worry about overzelous cops breaking down my door to confiscate my weapons?

I understand that liberal dopes think any weapons poscession is wrong.
I an many others feel that for my families protection from
government goobers, cops and criminals
it is necessary to own weapons.
Oh yeah, I think is is guaranteed in the constitution but that shouldn't worry authorities.


13 posted on 08/08/2004 3:13:35 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (4 more years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

This means if you have one gun and it could be stolen, you have too many guns.


14 posted on 08/08/2004 3:15:50 AM PDT by mlmr (Find a ring and put it round, round, roundAnd with ties so strong your two hearts are bound...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Yeah. Something smells about this.


15 posted on 08/08/2004 3:24:24 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
what constitutes an arsenal?

If it's more than ten, you can lock up me and half of all male West Virginians.

16 posted on 08/08/2004 3:37:04 AM PDT by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR

I once visited a home that had THOUSANDS of those Hummel figurines all over the place.

Now THAT was hideous!!!!!


17 posted on 08/08/2004 3:48:47 AM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
On what grounds did they search his home and seize his property? I wonder if there's more to this story.

Carolyn

18 posted on 08/08/2004 3:56:03 AM PDT by CDHart (I'm not crazy. I've just been in a bad mood for 40 years. [Steel Magnolias])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

What troubles me is that without a doubt the local authorities can find some law or other he has broken (does he start his car before putting his seatbelt on?) and the jury of his peers will punish him severely.

What is the likely outcome of this? If he sues to have his property returned, what will happen? Will the officers be punished personally in any way for violating his rights?

Gov't: I'm sorry, you can no longer speak freely. You've used too many words.

Citizen: How many words am I allowed?

Gov't: We make that determination on a case by case basis.


19 posted on 08/08/2004 4:04:42 AM PDT by blanknoone (Kerry is Bin Laden's Man, Bush is Mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

I hope there's more to it than "too many firearms" but some of the Police have gotten into the habit of confiscating money from folks that have "too much cash". :(


20 posted on 08/08/2004 4:09:26 AM PDT by Free Trapper (ALF & ELF - Future Bog People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson