Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abolish Electoral College, Jesse Jackson Says
CNSNEWS.com | 9/07/04

Posted on 09/07/2004 3:09:45 AM PDT by kattracks

CNSNews.com) - The Rev. Jesse Jackson and his son, Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-Ill.), are leading a call to abolish the Electoral College. They say getting rid of the Electoral College is the first step toward restoring "the sanctity of the vote."

According to a press release, Jackson -- accompanied by members of the U.S. House of Representatives -- "will seek a meeting with President Bush while offering specific information on what citizen initiatives are underway to place voting rights under the protection of the U.S. Constitution, rather than at the mercy of states' rights."

The Jacksons, father and son, were holding a noontime press conference in Washington on Tuesday to publicize their cause.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; camejo; cheney; dubya; edwards; election; electoralcollege; gwb; jessejackson; kerry; nader
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2004 3:09:46 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Time to abolish Jesse Jackson, this conservative says.


2 posted on 09/07/2004 3:12:34 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (*Barack Obama ~ Just Another Liberal Honkey With A Tan*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
STFU and sit down, you racebaiting tool, A Balrog of Morgoth says.
3 posted on 09/07/2004 3:13:39 AM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth ("Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted".- Joe Kennedy Sr. 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Is there anyone with at least a room temperature IQ who can't see through this transparent ploy? Hmm, Jesse, what could your motivation really be for eliminating the electoral college? Surely not because it would make it easier to elect Democrats, right?


4 posted on 09/07/2004 3:17:55 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The Jesses want to make sure the vote is counted... as long as its not from flyover country.


5 posted on 09/07/2004 3:18:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

You got that right! What an idiot. Unfortunately, you could tell from the Al Gore election that this was the next step toward the socialist agenda.


6 posted on 09/07/2004 3:21:19 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I believe the Jackson Rule applies in this case.

Anything Jesse is for, must be wrong. Anything Jesse is for, I am against.

7 posted on 09/07/2004 3:22:02 AM PDT by Roy Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Hey Jesse, I think the founding fathers were just a wee bit smarter and wiser than you. I think I'll stick with them.


8 posted on 09/07/2004 3:23:21 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Does anyone actually listen to Jessie anymore?


9 posted on 09/07/2004 3:25:05 AM PDT by chemicalman (Finally an answer for the prisoner problem at Abu Ghraib: Don't take any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
As I understand it, this is up to the individual states. According to a George Will article it is on the ballot for Colorado this fall.

Be careful, therefore, what you wish for Reverend Jackson. A movement of this sort will be popular in the heavily populated blue states but not so in the smaller and more conservative Red states.

Result... Large states split their electoral votes (instead of winner takes all to the darkside) and smaller states remain the same... looks like a win/win to me.

Where am I wrong...
10 posted on 09/07/2004 3:25:42 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hey Katt....let me guess...so City liberals can control the outcome of the Presidential race. Jesse must be smoking the crack with the whores that keep him company.
11 posted on 09/07/2004 3:31:04 AM PDT by Heff ("Liberty is not America's gift to the world, it's the Almighty's gift to humanity" GW Bush 4/12/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
while offering specific information on what citizen initiatives are underway to place voting rights under the protection of the U.S. Constitution

The electoral college and the Senate are the essence of the US Constitution.

They are two republican institutions that Mr. Jackson's friends on the courts will not be able to touch.

Expect the attack on them to intensify.

12 posted on 09/07/2004 3:33:10 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Hillary becomes the RAT candidate on October 9. You saw it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Moron !


13 posted on 09/07/2004 3:34:51 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack

In that confuration, yes, I would agree. But I think they want to do away with electoral college altogether, which woukld may favor the rats like 2000 would have with algore.
In any case, its a long established part of our constitution that I beleive I read has had 700 attempts to repeal over the years and all have failed. And it takes 75% of congress to reapeal, so no chance of it happening IMO


14 posted on 09/07/2004 3:35:15 AM PDT by libs_kma (If J effin K doesn't support your position now...just talk to him and he will...in a nuanced way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack
Where am I wrong...

The blue states will be the ones that oppose the changes keeping New England, NY, IL and CA as winner take all. Some of the red states might fall for the trick under the old Conservatives "trying to be fair to everyone" rules. Net loss.

We need to hammer home why this should not be adopted piece-meal as an attempt at "fairness". I am totally against abolishing the EC, but if it comes to that, it needs to be everywhere at the same time. And we will need a much better voting system.

15 posted on 09/07/2004 3:35:16 AM PDT by RobFromGa (A desperate man is a dangerous man, and Kerry is getting desperate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Does Je$$e know that a Constitutional amendment would be required to abolish the electoral college? And, where has the Demokratik party been the last four years?

Since, presumably, without the electoral college, Gore would be president (though the recount and lawsuits might still be underway four years later), why hasn't there been any action taken on the left to introduce the necessary legislation?



16 posted on 09/07/2004 3:35:29 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Gen. G.S. Patton: There is no soap ever invented that can wash that blood off (Kerry's) hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack

You're wrong only in the method. The electoral college, that is to say, going to a popular vote to elect the president, if I understand it correctly, could only be abolished by a Constitutional amendment. For that, they would need 2/3 vote of Congress, and only then would it go to the states, where 3/4 of the states would have to ratify it. Assuming it even went to the states (and I don't think it would ever make it out of Congress), they would never get even close to the required number of states.

All this talk about it is just talk. It's an elusive dream, and further evidence of their disregard for the Constitution.


17 posted on 09/07/2004 3:36:56 AM PDT by wimpycat (John Kerry has a fevah, and the only prescription is "MORE COWBELL".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Anything to keep them fly over farm honkies from being able to elect their own president...


18 posted on 09/07/2004 3:37:25 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
I think Jackson knows this. So why is he doing this?

It's an effort to make Bush and the Republicans look unfair. Note Jackson's use of the term "States Rights". This is how he fires up his base to make it appear the Bush and the Republicans are standing in the school house door, keeping black folks from voting. This is just a ploy to keep them fired up and on the plantation.

19 posted on 09/07/2004 3:44:33 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Jesse Jackson is too much of an idiot to figure out WHY we use the Electoral College in the first place. It IS all about fairness and proper representation.

Go away, Jesse. Shoo, fly, you bother me.

20 posted on 09/07/2004 3:47:00 AM PDT by Allegra (Is what I'm living right now just going to be one big "mistaken recollection?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson