Skip to comments.
Police: Puppy Shot Man Trying To Kill Dogs
Local6.com / AP / via Drudge ^
| 9/9/04
| AP
Posted on 09/09/2004 6:50:12 AM PDT by bondjamesbond
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 621-634 next last
To: Publius6961
Anyone who agrees to shooting a puppy in the head has the same mentality as a terrorist in my opinion.
21
posted on
09/09/2004 7:04:37 AM PDT
by
sonserae
To: bondjamesbond
Too bad he wasn't shot in the head instead.
22
posted on
09/09/2004 7:05:35 AM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
(A gun owner voting for John Kerry is like a chicken voting for Col. Saunders. (bye bye .30-30))
To: Jemian
No, people are not dogs. Which is why I like most dogs more than a lot of people I've encountered.
Guess this butthole is just paying the price for not being responsible enough to have his dog spayed. Good for the puppy!
23
posted on
09/09/2004 7:05:58 AM PDT
by
cjshapi
To: CSM
What kind of "man" shoots a dog?
Get off your ass and take the dogs to the shelter.
24
posted on
09/09/2004 7:06:35 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
("Can someone tell me where to find an ordained archpriest?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: Twinkie
Somehow I don't think Walmart will take too kindly to your suggestion.
However most newspapers will run giveaway ads for free. Seems odd he couldn't find a home for the puppies.
25
posted on
09/09/2004 7:07:01 AM PDT
by
visualops
(I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it.)
To: Jemian
True. Some dogs are better than some people.
26
posted on
09/09/2004 7:07:08 AM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
(A gun owner voting for John Kerry is like a chicken voting for Col. Saunders. (bye bye .30-30))
To: bondjamesbond
Ignorant dimwitted scum, and so is anyone who would agree with him.
Since they apparently have an animal shelter in his area, there is no excuse for this other than being a dimwitted, uncaring imbecile....or a sadist.
Too bad the puppy was more merciful than he was being. Name that dog 'Heston.'
27
posted on
09/09/2004 7:07:35 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
To: bondjamesbond
I love puppies, I do. but these critters weren't people they were his property. He wasn't killing them for fun, he was going to take care of the matter him self instead having the pound do it. OK it isn't to bright to try and shoot something while ur holding. He should have put them in a box and then exterminated them.
If he violated fire arms laws then of course he should face charges for that, but as for the puppies they were his property (at least that is how they would be described in Texas, Florida could be different and if he was within City limits he's a moron.) And if he wants to get rid of them he should have the right to do it him self and, Maybe he didn't want to give them away. There his Property (not kids, or mini-people)he should have the right to dispose of them as he wishes as long as it does not jeopardize another person
To: Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok
I hope you have your flame suit on. You're going to need it.
29
posted on
09/09/2004 7:13:15 AM PDT
by
Jemian
(Not all Moslems are terrorists, but [almost] all terrorists are moslem.)
To: Dan from Michigan
The pup knew what he was doing. At that close quarters, a ricochet off that ignutz's head could've been deadly.
To: Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok; Jemian
He stole your other tagline! : )
31
posted on
09/09/2004 7:16:15 AM PDT
by
LionsDaughter
(War Eagle! Beat Miss State!)
To: sinkspur
What kind of a man doesn't provide toys for pigs! Should we add "puppy's rights" to the Florida constitution?
Animals are property. They aren't human, no matter how cute they are!
32
posted on
09/09/2004 7:20:11 AM PDT
by
CSM
("Don't be economic girlie men!" - Governator, August 31, 2004, RNC)
To: Jemian
Never said I would shoot the puppies. I would have brought them to the pound. My point is they were his property, and while I think he was mean, if he had lived out in the country and couldnt give the dgs away, shooting them would be his perogative. I don't think its unreasonable to do for our selves what the government claims only it can do for us. In this case dispose of unwatnted pets.
Ps- A fire suit? I'm going to burn? for what? Do you really don't think God is going to send me to hell for having a diferent opinion than you on what this guy did? BUt if your really concerned you should pray for me.
To: skaterboy
Karma is a wonderful thing.
Perhaps the person who adopts the puppy might consider giving it the name KARMA! It would be far better than "Maria Teresa Thierstein Simões-Ferreira Heinz-Kerry" or "John Jakob Jingleheimer Schmidt"!!!
34
posted on
09/09/2004 7:25:19 AM PDT
by
albertp
(Malice in Blunderland, The Wizard of Odd, Gullible's Troubles! Steal the wealth, spread the poverty.)
To: Jemian
"Not all Moslems are terrorists, but [almost] all terrorists are moslem."
Both Muslim and Moslem are correct spellings.
35
posted on
09/09/2004 7:31:57 AM PDT
by
albertp
(Malice in Blunderland, The Wizard of Odd, Gullible's Troubles! Steal the wealth, spread the poverty.)
To: bondjamesbond
When guns are outlawed only PUPPIES will have guns
To: bondjamesbond
Guns don't shoot people. Puppies shoot people.
I am now in favor of a 7-day waiting period before puppies can purchase a handgun.
37
posted on
09/09/2004 7:36:21 AM PDT
by
brewcrew
To: sonserae
Muslim is THEIR preferred spelling : In their opinion "moslem" is somehow derogatory, like "oriental" instead of Asian. Not *exactly* racist, but they don't like it. I can't say I'm sure of exactly why they dislike the moslem spelling, but they do, from what I've read.
Which is why I prefer "moslem" to Muslim myself, of course. Mahometan or Mohammedan might be even better, but it's too long-takes too long to type.
I see no reason to worry about the delicate fragile feelings of people who dance in the streets when Americans and Israelis are killed .
38
posted on
09/09/2004 7:41:52 AM PDT
by
kaylar
To: Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok
No flame here. I love dogs and have rescued a couple of them from euthanasia myself but they are this man's property. He just should have selected a more humane way of disposing of them. (He obviously was not too gun-savvy.)
39
posted on
09/09/2004 7:43:25 AM PDT
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: mollynme
I see whee ur coming from, but do you think people would be as concerned if he was trying to shoot his pet snakes, rats or tarantulas that he couldn't give away?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 621-634 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson