Posted on 09/09/2004 7:31:10 AM PDT by ZGuy
Awwww. Maybe we should send him some cheese to go with his whine...
It feels so good to see Old Media squirm as it dies a slow, painful and well-deserved death...
Outstanding post! Journalism isn't brain surgery. It turns out that pretty much anyone can be a decent blogger (read "news editor"), even working part time.
Some of my leftist friends are stymied by Fox News. They insist that they lie and just make stuff up. I tried to explain to them that media bias usually doesn't manifest itself by reporting fake news. Media bias is mostly a function of excluding real news that doesn't fit an agenda.
When Fox runs a story and then 3 days later, it shows up in the New York Times, that's not Fox's "bias". That's a SCOOP. It used to be considered a GOOD thing.
Right. It seems there aren't many reporters left who are capable of gathering facts and writing them down in plain english.
How easily he excuses the bias that has been the cause of the awakening of the masses to the bald face distortions and slanted reporting of the anti-American communist news agencies.
That segment of zealots contains the majority of main stream Americans who have switched to Fox News to sop up slivers of fair reporting.
It is the minority of zealots, that dare to claim majority status, that makes up the major news networks that hate patriotism, nationalism, and the American culture. Their day is ending, and one cannot help but take pleasure at their discomfort.
BLUELANCER ...
Member in Good Standing
VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY GROUP
AMEN CORNER HATCHET TEAM
THE NASTY LITTLE CLIQUE
RAPID RESPONSE DIGITAL BROWN SHIRTS
THE VULGAR HORDE
FRANCO-GERMAN DISRUPTER PATROL
CULT OF THE VIKING KITTIES
NEO-CONSERVATIVE POWER VORTEX
KOSHER NOSTRA
ZIONIST BOOTLICKER ASSOCIATION
ARIEL SHARON BLOODSUCKER SQUAD
FREE REPUBLIC ANTI-SEMITE SNIPE HUNTING BRIGADE
TERRORIST ASSASSINATION OF MONTH CLUB
FUNDAMENTALIST FASCIST ZEALOTS
LIKUD/NEO-CONSERVATIVE CABAL
THE RIGHT WING APPARATUS
SINISTER CABAL OF DEVIOUS POWERMASTERS
THE TOTALITARIAN/NEOCON CABAL
ROYAL FRATERNITY OF UBER-CONSERVATIVES
IMPERIAL ORDER OF METAMUSIL WARRIORS
COMMITTEE TO ABOLISH LIBERALISM
FIERCE WAR-LIKE TRIBE OF INTERNET BRETHREN
KONSERVATIV CLICK GUERRILLAS
ISRAEL FIRST NEO-CON DREAMERS OF WORLD EMPIRE
FRENZIED NEO-CON PACK OF BUSH/CHENEY/SHARON LAPDOGS
SECRET AND DARK INNER COUNSEL FOR BUSH NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM
AMERICAN EVANGELICAL POWER BROKERS
THE INVINCIBLE ZIONIST VIRUS LOBBY
"a free-floating cadre of rightist warriors"
This seems to be a step up from right-wing extremists, being a warrior is a good thing, no? Especially when one is right.
Once again the Left demonstrates that it expects a complete, unchallenged monopoly or it will whine about how unfair life is.
...But it's hard to read the hand-wringing confessionals from news ...
...But it's hard enough to get the story right, without...
Literally, this is a case of bitch, bitch, bitch.
As a graduate of the University of Minnesota School of Journalism (late 80s), I agree with you.
I think part of the visceral reaction we see from those who run the "mainstream" media nowadays centers on the fact that there are news consumers today who can make news judgments on their own - and are no longer afraid to sing out when they feel wronged.
Most consumers can't perform the tasks that you and I were trained to do (although some, especially bloggers, can and do), but the point of the matter is that at least from an editorial standpoint, there are people who know at least as much as the editors. That frightens them, and the result is the pablum we see quoted by this writer.
I lost my respect for CNN during the invasion of Iraq, when Eason Jordan EVP and Chief News Executive of CNN, wrote an OpEd piece in (as I recall) the NY Times, defending CNN's news coverage from Iraq over the years.
In that article, he admitted that CNN routinely withheld information and flattered Saddam (I don't think he mentioned it in the article, but CNN's puff piece on his birthday party was one egregious example) in order to protect its access to Iraq. CNN even went so far as to withhold information that could have saved the lives of Saddam's sons-in-law who returned to Iraq from Jordan and were killed by him. If even refused to report on threats and torture of its own people.
What was the point of maintaining this access, if the access wasn't used to report the news?
The punchline of the story is that the Times apparently didn't find anything objectionable in Jordan's news decisions. I have not watched CNN for years, so I can't comment about its current coverage. I do know that the NY Times has gone beyond all boundries of common decency, and has utterly failed to uphold the first principle, that news belongs in the news pages and opinion belongs in the opinion pages and news-analysis pieces.
The NY Times used to be my secular bible. Today, I don't even buy it at airports, even for the crossword puzzle.
40 Days of Abu Garib prison stories by the NYT ring any bells?
HHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM???????????????????
Isn't that the theme of the Kerry Campaign?
Just the facts, bub, give us the facts. We didn't ask you to interpret them for us.
If Fox made stuff up, we would see a spate of articles about Fox's sloppy reporting. I can't recall a single one.
Let me get thsi straight. The author thinks he shouldn't provide both good news and bad news because the right wing demands it ? Shouldn't it be a concept that is germaine to accurate reporting ?
Excellent post. Don't you just love it?!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.