1 posted on
09/10/2004 10:11:53 AM PDT by
Pfesser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: Pfesser
LOL!
What's the frequency of your brain spasms, Kenneth?
78 posted on
09/10/2004 10:28:05 AM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Pfesser
Danny Boy is willing to take the fall for his Buddy Kerry.
He wants to give the idea that he will go down fighting, in hopes that the attention will just go away.
Won't work. This will just make it more fun.
It will be like slowly killing a spider. Pull of a leg...watch if squirm....pull off next leg...
To: Pfesser
Pssst: Hey Dan:
Laura Bush is a biker crankhead...
Barbara Bush is the pusher...
Pass it on!
To: Pfesser
Denial Dan makes Bagdad Bob seem trustworthy.
82 posted on
09/10/2004 10:29:26 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: Pfesser
I give anything to hear what they're talking about at the DNC/KE04 headquarters today!
I bet it'd make the Nixon oval office look like a Boy Scout meeting.
85 posted on
09/10/2004 10:30:29 AM PDT by
5by5
To: Pfesser
DNCBS
89 posted on
09/10/2004 10:31:41 AM PDT by
itsamelman
(“Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh.” -- Al Swearengen)
To: Pfesser
".....the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story..."
Rather needs a Swift Boat up his ass. Maybe he will search for answers to the questions by the Swiftees.
He could also take a few lesson on the documentation of a story from John O'Neill. "Yeah, that sounds like something Killian would have written" doesn't cut it.
To: Pfesser
Of course he will dig in. He is a stealth communist/socialist Clinton style. What was Clinton's
modus operandi?
DENY, (?) , DELAY, DESTROY?
It was a four word smirky line, but I can never remember the second word.
Worked for Clinton!
91 posted on
09/10/2004 10:32:39 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(I don't do diplomacy either)
To: Pfesser
Can someone explain to me why anyone is calling Dan Rather or CBS a "dupe" in this? Considering what they have been up to from the parent company on down in this election season, it looks to me that they are willing participants if not instigators.
95 posted on
09/10/2004 10:33:28 AM PDT by
penowa
To: Pfesser
This can't get any better, can it? What's next, video of Kerry and Edwards smoking crack together?
What a great week to be a freeper.
98 posted on
09/10/2004 10:35:56 AM PDT by
Toskrin
(War least of all goes according to plan.)
To: Pfesser
Dan Rather drinking his own Kool-Aid at last.
Good to the last drop, eh, Danny-Boy?100 posted on
09/10/2004 10:36:44 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
What's the frequency, Kenneth? Sorry, couldn't resist...
106 posted on
09/10/2004 10:38:48 AM PDT by
thecabal
("For all that you hold dear on this good Earth, I bid you stand, Men of the West!" --Aragorn)
To: Pfesser
CBS = CompleteBu!!Sh!+
108 posted on
09/10/2004 10:39:22 AM PDT by
spodefly
(I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
To: Pfesser
RATHER DIGS IN: THE DOCUMENTS ARE AUTHENTIC Yes - authentic forgeries!!
To: Pfesser
From the DNC website:
DNC Headlines
Sep 9, 2004: Bush Lied
Sep 9, 2004: Questions George Bush Must Answer About His Service
Sep 9, 2004: DNC Launches 2 New TV Ads
Sep 8, 2004: McAuliffe Statement on Breaking News About Bush's Military Record
To: Pfesser
Hey - I like Rather... he's a good tipper...
123 posted on
09/10/2004 10:47:54 AM PDT by
badgerlandjim
(Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
To: Pfesser
Captain Queeg defends "The Strawberry Incident."
This guy is insane, I'm convinced.
125 posted on
09/10/2004 10:48:26 AM PDT by
SerpentDove
(You can curse the darkness, or you can light a candle. Me, I like cursing the darkness.)
To: Pfesser
I want to make clear to you if I have not made clear to you, that this story is true, and that more important questions than how we got the story, which is where those who don't like the story like to put the emphasis, the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story, which I just gave you earlier. If the source documents are forged, how can anyone vouch for the story being true? This is nonsense. If the information is incorrect, why would anyone address the questions raised?
131 posted on
09/10/2004 10:51:09 AM PDT by
kabar
To: Pfesser
Would you bet your entire career and credibility on it, Dan?
132 posted on
09/10/2004 10:51:10 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Pfesser
Dan Rather is overdue for another of his famous public temper tantrums... only this time with George W Bush...
Rather's shows have lost so many viewers his 'career' is over...he will do anything...
tell any lie....just to keep his yammering face in front of the cameras...
Rather is just another 'propaganda' whore in an ocean of propanda whores...only he is a ancient dinosaur... sans 'teeth'..
Time for ole 'Dyno Danny' to just fall into the tar pit of obsolescent anonymity....and will you just get it over with already.......for cryin' out loud...
imo
133 posted on
09/10/2004 10:51:44 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Two Heads Are Better Than One...Unless They're On The Same Person -Andy Sipowicz)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson