Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: craig61a

I'm not a gun sort of guy, but I wonder while reading these articles exactly how often these "weapons" were used during a crime. The media make it sound as though it was the criminals choice of weapon pre 1994.


5 posted on 09/13/2004 5:45:02 AM PDT by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Glenn

The whole ban thing was a reesult of reporters watching "Boyz N The Hood" one time too many


8 posted on 09/13/2004 5:49:49 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Kerry was for using superscript before he was against it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Glenn

I saw a study a year ago that said that these types of weapons were involved in less than 3% of violent crimes. Some states have never recorded ANY felonies that were committed with "Assault Weapons". They are not the weapon of choice for most criminals because they're expensive and difficult to conceal.


13 posted on 09/13/2004 5:53:41 AM PDT by mbynack (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Glenn
You ask the wrong question. Criminals will use any weapon they can get until they can get no more locally. Then they will just import or buy them from Al Quada. Those high capacity magazines make fine cocaine shipping containers so they get a twofer by importing them.

The whole argument about what guns criminals use is specious to begin with. We call them criminals for a REAL reason. Disarming law abiding citizens doesn't affect criminals one wit.

But arming citizens does. Criminals tend to go into another line of work when citizens are armed. Works everywhere it's tried.
45 posted on 09/13/2004 6:37:09 AM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Glenn
"I wonder while reading these articles exactly how often these "weapons" were used during a crime."

Wonder no more.
According to the federal gummint, the answer is "Not hardly ever."

The original "Ban" legislation mandated a federal study to determine the effects on crime, if any, of the ban.
The conclusion was that no relationship could be established, in part because the numbers of crimes committed with weapons of the sort banned were statistically insignificant, and also in part because functionally identical weapons with only cosmetic differences were NOT banned.

According to that same Justice Dept study, there may have been one small unintended consequence of the Ban: making new manufacture of the firearms illegal made the existing ones highliy collectible, driving up the prices and making it likely that a criminal would sell his at a profit rather than using it in crime and risking losing it!

83 posted on 09/13/2004 11:01:21 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson