Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Fired For Kerry Bumper Sticker Has New Job (Kerry
AP - ClickOnDetroit ^ | September 15, 2004

Posted on 09/15/2004 4:11:47 PM PDT by quantim

John Kerry Campaign Hires Fired Worker

POSTED: 9:06 am EDT September 15, 2004

DETROIT -- Democrat John Kerry has a new campaign worker helping him drum up support in Alabama after hiring a woman who was fired for displaying the presidential candidate's bumper sticker on her car.

Kerry called Lynne Gobbell on Tuesday after reading a newspaper story describing how she had been fired last Thursday from her job packing cellulose insulation at a Moulton, Ala., plant.

Gobbell said her former employer had told her she could either work for him or Kerry. She said Kerry told her, "Let him know that as of today, you're working for John Kerry." "He was proud of me for standing up for what I believe in," the newly employed, 41-year-old said of her quick phone call with the candidate.

Gobbell said Kerry didn't offer too many details about her new position. She will be helping the campaign and may be traveling a little as it gets closer to the election.

She could receive help from another corner, as well. A liberal Web site, AMERICAblog.org, began raising money for Gobbell on Monday night after learning of her dismissal. John Aravosis, who runs the site, said he collected $1,800 over a 24-hour period.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bumperstickers; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-173 next last
To: conshack

You know what? You're just as much a jerk as the A-hole employer who fired this woman because she had a Kerry bumper sticker on her car.

Since you're so hung up on Kool-Aid, why don't you make yourself a big pitcher of cherry Kool-Aid and pour a bottle of Thunderbird in it. Just guzzle some down, and go to sleep, okay? You'll feel better in the morning. LOL!


101 posted on 09/15/2004 5:40:22 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
What's so "extreme" about not wanting someone to advertise for a political candidate that you don't support on the property you own?

Because most people don't care that much. Especially if it is not effecting business.

Some people do. But since it is out of step with what the majority of people do it can be categorized as extreme.

Does not mean that it was bad, just means that it is not run of the mill. It is like the lady who repeatedly brought pork products into the company lunch room after she was asked not to. She was fired. People were screaming about that but it was their property so they were in the right. However the position is out of the norm and therefore it was a bit extreme.

BTW, she might have a case if, but only if, he allows other employees to have political tags on their car that are parked in the company lot. If it is a company policy then she has no case.

102 posted on 09/15/2004 5:43:48 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ("Arrrg," the captain said thoughtfully. ("Lady Snuggles of the Lethal Yew"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ladylib

You know what? You're just as much a jerk as the A-hole employer who fired this woman because she had a Kerry bumper sticker on her car.

Since you're so hung up on Kool-Aid, why don't you make yourself a big pitcher of cherry Kool-Aid and pour a bottle of Thunderbird in it. Just guzzle some down, and go to sleep, okay? You'll feel better in the morning. LOL!


Your Liberalism is shining through. Two posts on a thread and you've alredy determined that I'm an A-hole. Besides, you dumbass liberal, it's already morning for me. I've never been a kool-aid drinker and Thunderbird wine is also a liberal's drink. I prefer Boone's Farm myself. Grown yourself a brain, obtain an IQ larger than your shoe size and then come back for some intelligent conversation. Be sure to vote early and often for the Kerry/Edwards ticket on Nov 2. They need all the help they can get.


103 posted on 09/15/2004 5:46:53 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: conshack

Just try to get some rest okay? I bet you're foaming at the mouth now.

Good night.


104 posted on 09/15/2004 5:47:48 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

Says you, Bull Spunkey-punky.

I'm a small ($1.8m) businessman - garden center & nursery owner in Penna - and have been around that track 4x in 15 years, after hundreds of employees, with only less than a handful of problem employees, and the courts won't touch it. The EEOC/OSHA/FEDS cave on firings, every time; the exception being blatant discrimination, which is very, very hard to prove.

On my private - with public exclusion - property, I can fire an employee, for ANY REASON I deem worthy; likewise, I can ban a retail customer for ANY REASON I deem worthy. Other than obvious racial, sexual, handicapped etc discrimination, there are no legal limits on employers' ability to fire employees.

If I had one of the three-plus, previously-stated category employees, I certainly wouldn't use their *protection category* status to fire them. Rather, it would be, "It isn't working out. You're fired. No further discussion is warranted. Check will be in the mail on Friday at 3pm. Bye."

Come onto my property as an employee or customer with ANYTHING THAT OFFENDS ME, and I'll drop you like a 50lb sack of sh!t, on a 20mile hike, and throw you outta here! Try me; dare you.

The so-called *BS* you espouse, is in your obvious liberal head, spunky-punky.


105 posted on 09/15/2004 5:49:14 PM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
"However the position is out of the norm and therefore it was a bit extreme."

LOL! Not at all. Only one person has the right to determine what is norm when it comes to displaying political advertisements...the owner. If the owner does not wish them it is the norm for his property and is not extreme in any manner whatsoever. It is his property and he determines the norm.

106 posted on 09/15/2004 5:49:22 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: quantim
Gobbell said Kerry didn't offer too many details about her new position.

Kerry & Co. always need document authenticators.

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

107 posted on 09/15/2004 5:49:57 PM PDT by Mike Bates (Buy and read "Right Angles and Other Obstinate Truths." Well, buy it anyway, OK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladylib

Just try to get some rest okay? I bet you're foaming at the mouth now.

Good night.


One more liberal troller bites the dust. Enjoy DU.


108 posted on 09/15/2004 5:55:37 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: conshack

Boone's Farm. I guess that says it all.


109 posted on 09/15/2004 5:58:36 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ladylib

Boone's Farm. I guess that says it all.

You're even more of a DUMBa$$ than I thought. I don't even drink wine. I definitely don't drink kool-aid either. You fell for it ladylib. Believe EVERY word. Go back to your land of Liberalism, smoke some of that stuff, pack a few dark spots, marry your gay lover and live as a happy liberal forever after. Good day you old bag.


110 posted on 09/15/2004 6:06:17 PM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
The relevant part of 18USC245 Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law,..., or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with- (1) any person because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from -

1(A) voting... in any primary, special, or general election;

(5) any citizen because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such citizen...from lawfully aiding or encouraging other persons to participate, without discrimination on account of race, color, religion or national origin, in any of the benefits or activities described in subparagraphs (1)(A) through (1)(E) or subparagraphs (2)(A) through (2)(F), or participating lawfully in speechor peaceful assembly opposing any denial of the opportunity to so participate - shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both

18USC241 Conspiracy against rights.(In the event an associate of the employer was involved in the decision)

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or...

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; ...

The complaint from the story:

"We were going back to work from break, and my manager told me that Phil said to remove the sticker off my car or I was fired," she said. "I told him that Phil couldn't tell me who to vote for. He said, 'Go tell him.' "

She went to Gaddis' office, knocked on the door and entered on his orders.

"Phil and another man who works there were there," she said. "I asked him if he said to remove the sticker and he said, 'Yes, I did.' I told him he couldn't tell me who to vote for. When I told him that, he told me, 'I own this place.' I told him he still couldn't tell me who to vote for."

Gobbell said Gaddis told her to "get out of here."

"I asked him if I was fired and he told me he was thinking about it," she said. "I said, 'Well, am I fired?' He hollered and said, 'Get out of here and shut the door.' "

She said her manager was standing in another room and she asked him if that meant for her to go back to work or go home. The manager told her to go back to work, but he came back a few minutes later and said, " 'I reckon you're fired. You could either work for him or John Kerry,' " Gobbell said."

111 posted on 09/15/2004 6:11:29 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

Comment #112 Removed by Moderator

To: conshack

I'll pass on the so-called "intelligent conversation" that you offered in your last post, okay?

Go jump in the lake, jerk. I promise I'll never post to you again if you won't post to me. Truce?

Sincerely hoping never, ever to hear from you again, good night and good riddance.

Just stop foaming at the mouth and try to get some rest, okay? You really will feel better in the morning.

Bye.


113 posted on 09/15/2004 6:17:44 PM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

Once again, spunkey-punky:

"On my private - with public exclusion - property, I can fire an employee, for ANY REASON I deem worthy; likewise, I can ban a retail customer for ANY REASON I deem worthy. Other than obvious racial, sexual, handicapped etc discrimination, there are no legal limits on employers' ability to fire employees.

If I had one of the three-plus, previously-stated category employees, I certainly wouldn't use their *protection category* status to fire them. Rather, it would be, "It isn't working out. You're fired. No further discussion is warranted. Check will be in the mail on Friday at 3pm. Bye."

Come onto my property as an employee or customer with ANYTHING THAT OFFENDS ME, and I'll drop you like a 50lb sack of sh!t, on a 20mile hike, and throw you outta here! Try me; dare you.

The so-called *BS* you espouse, is in your obvious liberal head, spunky-punky."

C'mon, MESS WITH ME!


114 posted on 09/15/2004 6:18:20 PM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
"Come onto my property as an employee or customer with ANYTHING THAT OFFENDS ME, and I'll drop you like a 50lb sack of sh!t, on a 20mile hike, and throw you outta here! Try me; dare you. The so-called *BS* you espouse, is in your obvious liberal head, spunky-punky." C'mon, MESS WITH ME!"

Blowhard, no more than a breeze a fly whips up...

115 posted on 09/15/2004 6:24:05 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: quantim

Guaranteed unemployment in 6 weeks.


116 posted on 09/15/2004 6:29:27 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Coward? Punk? Lowlife? Scumbag? Subhuman; crawl back under your slimy, algae-covered rock, spunkey-punkey boy.

I'm waiting for you, wimpy, idiot-savant... C'mon spunkey-punkey-girlie-boy... I FART in your specific direction, girlie-boy.

You make a great liberal-demokkkRAT, butt-boy. You can't quote reality; can only quote failed, liberal faux-law. Freaking pathetic poster. You're a sickening, lib-dem POS, spunkey-girlie-boy.

JFC, you're an uninformed, lowlife. Bye, buttwipe! You're on my *IGNORE ASSHOLES LIST*. Congrats...

117 posted on 09/15/2004 6:41:03 PM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
The boss sounds like a fairly intolerant dude.

Perhaps on the surface, thanks for the link.  Beneath the 'press copy' I get the impression that this employee had more than a bumper sticker.  This employee I'm guessing was trying to organize unions, hold dem rallies on company property, that sort of thing for a period and the owner finally said enough is enough.  Good riddance to that fattie, I'm going with the employer.
118 posted on 09/15/2004 7:56:40 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: dwilli

Maybe mother Teresa will hire her and send her packing (canning) at one of their many plants.


119 posted on 09/15/2004 7:59:15 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: quantim

It will only be a TEMP JOB so I hope she finds herself looking for a real job again soon.


120 posted on 09/15/2004 8:00:40 PM PDT by lawgirl (It's not about Vietnam- it's about John Kerry's lies about Vietnam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson