Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal agents surround ranch in Douglas, Arizona(VIDEO!)
KVOA-TV-Tucson/AP ^ | September 16, 2004 at 5:00PM MST | KVOA-TV-Tucson/AP

Posted on 09/16/2004 10:16:04 PM PDT by Conservative Firster

TWO VIDEO LINKS ON RIGHT HAND SIDE PLAYLIST!!

An FBI agent shot an acquaintance of a border watch group member while trying to serve an arrest warrant, FBI officials said Thursday.

The shooting happened about 11:15 p.m. Wednesday in a grocery store parking lot in Douglas along the southeastern Arizona border with Mexico.

According to the FBI, the agent was trying to serve an arrest warrant on Casey Nethercott of Douglas. Nethercott is a known member of Ranch Rescue, a group that works to protect private property along the southern U.S. border.

Ranch Rescue and several other unauthorized groups have been patrolling along the border looking for illegal immigrants, raising concerns among migrants rights groups about potential abuses.

At the time, Nethercott was with 22-year-old Kalen Riddle, also of Douglas.

Charlene Thornton, special agent in charge of the Phoenix FBI office, said that "actions taken by Nethercott and Riddle led one of the FBI agents to fire his weapon."

The FBI would not elaborate and said it won't release the name of the agent who fired the shot, in keeping with FBI policy.

Riddle was airlifted to a Tucson hospital, but FBI officials did not know his condition.

Nethercott was arrested Wednesday and is in federal custody. An FBI spokeswoman confirmed agents searched Nethercott's Douglas ranch on Thursday afternoon.

The warrant the FBI was trying to serve alleges that Nethercott threatened Border Patrol agents.

According to the warrant, Nethercott refused to pull over for Border Patrol agents on Aug. 31. After a slow-speed chase, the warrant said that Nethercott entered "a compound in Douglas occupied by members of Ranch Rescue." Riddle was identified as one of the people there.

Agents said the Ranch Rescue members were heavily armed and had night vision equipment.

After Border Patrol agents yelled for Nethercott to show his hands, the affidavit says Nethercott refused, and responded:

"I'm going to take care of this myself, we're going to have a shootout."

The affidavit does not say how the standoff ended.

There was no listing for Riddle in Douglas. A phone message left Thursday at a residence listed for Nethercott was not returned.

Nethercott, 37, has a criminal record. He was convicted of assault with a firearm in California and was on parole when he joined Ranch Rescue.

In June, he was also found guilty by a Texas jury of felony firearm possession. The jury was deadlocked on a second charge that accused Nethercott of pistol-whipping an illegal immigrant near a Texas ranch.

Douglas rancher Roger Barnett, who is not part of Ranch Rescue, supports the measures Nethercott took to stop illegal immigration.

He compared the shooting of Riddle to Branch Davidians, who fought federal agents in Waco, Texas.

"Citizens have to get out and protect themselves," Barnett said. "And this is what it leads to."


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aliens; fbi; immigrantlist; immigration; nethercott; ranchrescue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-228 next last
To: Cultural Jihad
"If they weren't committing misdemeanor border crossings, then we wouldn't have committed felony assaults upon them!" "If the jaywalkers weren't out there breaking the law, then we wouldn't have to be swerving trying to hit them!"

"If they weren't simply overstaying their visas and stretching immigration regulations then they wouldn't have been able to fly 3 airliners into buildings and a 4th into the ground killing 3000 people and throwing the world into World War IV."

Nethercott was acquitted of the felony assault charges. He DID NOT assault the border intruders in Texas.

121 posted on 09/17/2004 7:38:32 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
I strongly disagree that there is not enough information to make assumptions.

There is plenty of information in there if you want to see it.

Clearly you don't want to.

There is not enough information there to declare my statements as FACT, but there is plenty there to lead to the assumptions I did.

That is why I used words such as "Chances are good that..." and things along that line.

You say that the article did not say specifically what actions Riddle and Nethercott took to get this to the point of gunfire.

Why should they? Why in the world would the FBI be under any obligation to give a newspaper information about a case?

There are some things that the public has a right to know, but details of a criminal case do not have to be divulged. Especially one that is still under investigation.
This one is almost certainly under some sort of investigation because someone was shot. I've never known of a police shooting that wasn't investigated.They will be looking carefully at that and any agent that gave details like that to the press would be in big trouble.

Many freepers seem to think that the government has to inform them of every move they make.

As an example... someone posted a tread last night moaning about how the BATF, FBI, and the Justice Department weren't doing anything about several different issues.

Just because they didn't send us the memo, doesn't mean nothing is happening.

I looked at this article from a completely different perspective than you did.

There are plenty of clues in that article to support my argument.

Plenty.
122 posted on 09/17/2004 7:42:36 AM PDT by texasflower (How appropriate...... the pro abortion party is the "D 'N' C")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

I'm beginning to think that something goes seriously wrong with the mind when a small group of men gather together in an isolated area with a stock of weapons.

Right or wrong, for whatever reason they are doing it, do they somehow think that if the government decides, right or wrong, to come get them - they can simply shoot their way out ?

The only way you have a chance of beating the government is with lawyers - do these fools actually think they are going to win a pissing contest with the Feds ?


123 posted on 09/17/2004 7:44:40 AM PDT by RS (Just because the PJ Posse is out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
"Lawn-clippers and dishwashers are not "foreign invaders" unless you are a dandelion or a greasy pan."

The problem with illegal "lawn clippers and dishwashers" is they breed, the increase of which automatically become citizens of the United States. Current law states that we must educate them in the public school systems at taxpayer expense. They also receive the whole gammit of taxpayer funded social programs. They create a need for dual language teachers in the system that costs more money. And most importantly, just why do they think they have a right to subvert the current immagration laws by jumping to the head of the line?

124 posted on 09/17/2004 7:48:07 AM PDT by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Mark my words; if he coasts to reelection, watch deficits and illegals explode in numbers.

If he coasts to reelection, they'll no longer be illegal.

125 posted on 09/17/2004 7:49:19 AM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Where is your outcry against the assaults on Border Patrol agents by Mexican soldiers?

Where would you get the impression that I am not outraged by that?

Why would I bring that up on this thread?

Nothing in that article was about that.

I prefer to stay on topic.

I don't like all of the illegals coming into the country either.

But my comments were based on my reaction to a couple of posters blaming the agents and calling the thugs "law abiding citizens".

The article had tons of information in there that made it clear these guys were not innocent citizens.

That's what my comments were about.

126 posted on 09/17/2004 7:49:59 AM PDT by texasflower (How appropriate...... the pro abortion party is the "D 'N' C")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Looks to me like the guy was a convicted felon, had a warrant for yet anohter arrest out on him, and put up a struggle. I don't see the problem.


127 posted on 09/17/2004 7:59:57 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
For all there whackiness these guys hadn't hurt anyone and were very careful of how they treated border intruders.

That's not the info I'm getting from folks that worked with Casey and Jack Foote

128 posted on 09/17/2004 8:02:08 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (Top Agency Source)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: texasflower

You're being way too calm and reasonable here. That's never going to fly in one of these immigration threads where logic and reason are poor substitutes for rabid hysteria.


129 posted on 09/17/2004 8:10:30 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: texasflower

Sorry, I don't see enough information in the article to justify the assumptions made.


130 posted on 09/17/2004 8:23:47 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: normy
You so called conservatives, blah blah blah

I don't believe I mentioned Bush, but yeah whatever, good buddy.

131 posted on 09/17/2004 8:33:00 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

Comment #132 Removed by Moderator

To: Travis McGee

You're going against the Ranch Rescue groupthink.


133 posted on 09/17/2004 8:47:02 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Read your own tag line good buddy (and I mean that, good buddy)


134 posted on 09/17/2004 8:47:34 AM PDT by normy (Kerry doesn't want us to trust him to do the right thing, he wants us to trust France to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
Lets see here.

Convicted felon on parole refuses to stop for Border Patrol Agents in high smuggling traffic area.

Drives to compound where armed friends are waiting.

Refuses to comply with Border Patrol Agents and threatens a shootout.

BP Agents back off and notify FBI of the encounter.

FBI secures an arrest warrant through a federal magistrate (legally and constitutionally)

FBI servers warrant in accordance with law and during the process a second individual does something (not stated in the article) and ends up shot.

I think that Ranch Rescue needs to reconsider who they are associating with if the want to have any credibility. We all understand and support what they are trying to do, however we also know the kind of people who tend to flock to these kinds of issues.

Nothing will discredit Ranch Rescue, it mission and all the other people trying to bring attention to this problem more than allowing Al Sadir wantabies to run amuck turn Arizona into Iraq.

135 posted on 09/17/2004 8:49:16 AM PDT by usurper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
That's not the info I'm getting from folks that worked with Casey and Jack Foote

My sources tell me otherwise. I guess we're agreed on one thing, they went whacko when they went "militia" and there are differing stories about how things operated inside their organization.

136 posted on 09/17/2004 8:50:05 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: normy
Oh it's my tag line you don't like. Too bad. Here's a virtual kleenex
137 posted on 09/17/2004 8:50:20 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
Northcutt and his associate may well be bad guys. Some FR posters prejudicially assume that the LEOs are the guilty parties in any confrontation with civilians without having sufficient facts. However, the Border Patrol faces far more serious issues than these private militias or those who sympathize with their cause. The Mexican Army units that have confronted the Border Patrol are better armed. Criminal elements, such as drug smugglers, have no compunction about killing Border Patrol agents if needed.

The year the Dallas Cowboys won the Super Bowl for the first time since Landry's time, the victory parade in downtown Dallas degenerated into a riot. Teenagers who left school to go to the parade went on a rampage, overwhelming the police on hand. About an hour after the riot commenced, there was a Dallas PD unit running a speed trap about 15 miles north of downtown. I have no idea why this police officer was not sent downtown to help stop the rioting. It was, however, a poor use of police resources in a crisis. Similarly, having the Border Patrol shutting down these private militias, whose goal supposedly parallels that of the agency, is a poor use of its limited resources.

The rightful anger of Border Patrol agents and their families should rather be focused on the politicians who are not serious about tightening control over the borders of this nation.

138 posted on 09/17/2004 8:55:16 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

I just put 2 and 2 together. Its not that hard.


139 posted on 09/17/2004 8:55:18 AM PDT by normy (Kerry doesn't want us to trust him to do the right thing, he wants us to trust France to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: normy

Well if it makes you feel any better I think Kerry is a lot worse than Bush


140 posted on 09/17/2004 8:56:49 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson