Skip to comments.
Good Riddance to a Bad Drug (Vioxx)
NY Times ^
| October 2, 2004
| ERIC J. TOPOL
Posted on 10/01/2004 10:14:28 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
The author is one of the most well known cardiologists in the country. Ibuprofen is also sold as Motrin.
1
posted on
10/01/2004 10:14:29 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; ...
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
2
posted on
10/01/2004 10:16:12 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
3
posted on
10/01/2004 10:24:17 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
To: neverdem
I had a severe inflammation in my lower spine, to the point of near immobility. My doctor prescibed VIOXX, and it was like switching a light bulb off. I was able to regain mobility, which allowed me to perform exercises to strengthen my lower back muscles for long term relief. I used VIOXX for approximately 8 weeks. It worked EXACTLY as intended. Now, I am not sure I would want to take this drug continuously for years, but it did do what was expected and needed for the short term. As such, I am saddened that the drug has been withdrawn. My own personal experience tells me that it has positive theraputic value. No drug is completely safe or risk free.
4
posted on
10/01/2004 10:25:57 PM PDT
by
Rebel_Ace
(Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
To: neverdem
Yikes! Thanks for posting. I take Bextra (and before that, Vioxx).
I'll have to speak with my dr. about this matter.
5
posted on
10/01/2004 10:29:47 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
(At his first crisis, "President" Kerry will sail his Swiftboat to safety, then call Teddy.)
To: neverdem
One must always be deeply skeptical of the rhetoric of the NY Times, a slick propaganda outlet with little credibility and a massive agenda. And, as we have seen in the CBS debacle, "well known" experts are meaningless when you are dealing with the the disreputable NY Times and news plants by their close allies, the corrupt trial lawyer industry.
There are many patients who absolutely swear by Vioxx as the only medication that consistently helps their severe orthopedic problems. Patients who would accept the slightly increased risk of heart attacks to relieve their agony. What are these patients to do now?
6
posted on
10/01/2004 10:34:55 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: neverdem
Neverdem, how do NSAIDs such as naproxen stack up against COX-2 inhibitors as regards liver toxicity?
7
posted on
10/01/2004 10:37:41 PM PDT
by
dandi
(in flame-retardant pajamas)
To: Rebel_Ace
I was busy typing away on post #6 while you posted #4. This is exactly the point I was making. People do not realize the absolute agony of back problems and other arthritic/orthopedic conditions. They have no idea. It is a tragedy that the litigation industry has forced Vioxx off the market.
8
posted on
10/01/2004 10:38:19 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: neverdem
For short term use this is a fantastic drug. Any of the Cox-1 or Cox-2 drugs will have side effects if used too long. (Even Aspirin) Those pathways are included in the body for a reason.
9
posted on
10/01/2004 10:44:21 PM PDT
by
Nov3
(They knifed babies, They raped girls, They forced children to drink their own urine)
To: Ciexyz; All
The cause of this problem is that Vioxx has a slight blood thickening side effect, increasing the risk of thrombosis (clotted, coagulated blockage). Celebrex, also a COX-2 anti-inflammatory drug, does not have this property. I am told that Bextra, the final one of the new COX-2 drugs, also is not a blood thickener.
I would also caution people about bad advice in the NY Times "expert" report anti-pharmaceutical/trial lawyer hit piece: the recommended Ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil, Nuprin) thickens the blood just like Vioxx, I am told.
10
posted on
10/01/2004 10:45:19 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: FormerACLUmember
It is a tragedy that the litigation industry has forced Vioxx off the market.Not only that, but the money Merck is going to have to pay out in settling litigation claims is money they won't spend on samples and patient-assistance programs for other drugs they produce.
11
posted on
10/01/2004 10:47:05 PM PDT
by
Spyder
To: dandi
Don't know about the comparative liver toxicity but I do know that naproxen sodium worked wonders for me. Much less upper GI irritation than ibuprofen or aspirin. Not sure if this is due to the infrequent dosing (8-12) hours, or less inherent tendency to irritate.
12
posted on
10/01/2004 10:51:56 PM PDT
by
steve86
To: Spyder
..The money Merck is going to have to pay out in settling litigation claims is money they won't spend on samples and patient-assistance programs for other drugs they produce.And destroy Merck's contribution to the world class research in an industry that the US is the unquestioned leader in the world: medical and pharmaceutical technology. The "rat party" and its trial lawyers will eliminate this leadership unless we fight these evil b*st*rds.
13
posted on
10/01/2004 10:53:04 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: FormerACLUmember
Yup, every drug is a balance between risk and benefit, between cost and efficacy, etc, etc. My goodness, even opiates have some value, depending upon the circumstances. Again, long term use of opiates is probably not a good thing either. Damn lawyers...
14
posted on
10/01/2004 10:54:18 PM PDT
by
Rebel_Ace
(Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
To: Rebel_Ace
All medications have side effects and risk/benefit issues. Even vitamins and "herbs."
In any case thank God you showed an excellent response to Vioxx. May you enjoy continued good health, my friend.
15
posted on
10/01/2004 10:58:39 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: Rebel_Ace
I had a severe inflammation in my lower spine, to the point of near immobility. My doctor prescibed VIOXX, and it was like switching a light bulb off. I was able to regain mobility, which allowed me to perform exercises to strengthen my lower back muscles for long term relief. I used VIOXX for approximately 8 weeks. It worked EXACTLY as intended.
Same here Rebel_Ace. I've been going to get injections in my back every month for years. I have a terrible back - damned thing! The VIOXX helped immensely. I've been taking it for about a year and I've only had to get injections twice. It was the best I've found because it helped the pain while having no effect on my mental and motor skills. Guess I'll go back to 20 jabs per month in the spine now.
16
posted on
10/01/2004 11:22:59 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's getting hard to see through all of the "white out" on my screen.)
To: neverdem
I was prescribed Vioxx for a back injury, I used it for a month, but it seemed useless. It did nothing for the back pain. I stopped taking it and switched to regular OTC pain relievers. Thank God I didn't keep using it.
17
posted on
10/01/2004 11:25:05 PM PDT
by
kenth
(Tucking tail and running is not an exit strategy, it's cowardice and surrender.)
To: FormerACLUmember
Actually, those drugs inhibit platelet aggregation in the same manner as aspirin.
18
posted on
10/01/2004 11:31:06 PM PDT
by
dandi
(in flame-retardant pajamas)
To: neverdem; FormerACLUmember; Doc Savage; Rebel_Ace
Vioxx worked well on my cervical arthritis, herniated lumbar discs, and knee and ankle fluid/inflammation issues but I never took it for over a week or two at a time and in conjunction with some fine opiate.
My wife swears by Bextra for da crampster.
This cardiologist has solid creds and I'm sure is no pal of the malpractice lawyers.
I hate to see Merck take a hit....they are a first class dope outfit.
and I'm sorry for those who really need it all the time.
(I was taking Vioxx for the first time just weeks after open heart btw)
19
posted on
10/01/2004 11:33:27 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
To: FormerACLUmember
...Bextra, the final one of the two COX-2 inhibitors, also is not a blood thickener. Thanks for that info. I'll mention this article to my physician at my next office visit, but you have put my mind to rest for now.
Bextra has helped my arthritic condition. I have been taking it for almost two years, and am aware of the possibility of liver damage with extended use. My doctor periodically checks for any signs of that problem.
Trust FR - if there's new info on any topic, someone will post it. GO FR!
20
posted on
10/01/2004 11:39:55 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
(At his first crisis, "President" Kerry will sail his Swiftboat to safety, then call Teddy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson