Posted on 10/09/2004 11:12:55 PM PDT by kingattax
Every reporter covering the election should, after the second presidential debate in St. Louis, be demanding of Kerry an answer to the following question: Who are the scientists who told you that "we have the option" of curing Parkinson's, diabetes, spinal-cord injuries, or any other disease using embryonic stem cells? If they won't ask him, the Bush campaign should defy him to name the names. He won't be able to do it. No scientists even those most pro-Kerry and aggressively in favor of the federal funding of embryo-destructive research ever told Kerry any such thing.
What Kerry has done here is told the big lie about embryonic stem cells. The claim that "we have the option" of curing Parkinson's disease, diabetes, etc. with embryonic stem cells is outrageous. No one knows when or even whether or not human embryonic stem cells will be therapeutically useful in treating any major disease or injury. There are profound perhaps insuperable problems with the therapeutic use of these cells. So, despite the fact that there is no federal ban on embryonic-stem-cell research, and that such research can be funded with state money and is being publicly funded in various places abroad, no embryonic-stem-cell-based therapy is even in clinical trials.
For months now, the Kerry campaign and its surrogates, such as Ron Reagan Jr., have cruelly led suffering people to believe that cures for their diseases are just around the corner. All we have to do is replace Bush with Kerry, open the federal funding spigot, and presto! The blind see and the lame walk! The Kerry campaign's hyping of embryo-destructive research for political gain is the cruelest and most shameful episode in the story of the 2004 election.
What Elizabeth Long (the woman who asked Kerry the stem-cell question) said is true: "Thousands of people have already been cured or treated by the use of adult stem cells or umbilical-cord stem cells. However, no one has been cured by using embryonic stem cells. Wouldn't it be wise to use stem cells obtained without the destruction of an embryo?
Kerry answered with a lie. A lie that will falsely inflate the hopes of countless people who would dearly love to believe that "we have the option" of curing them.
Robert P. George is McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and director of the James Madison Program at Princeton University.
I said this earlier, but when Kerry talks about this issue (and PBA) he sounds like Dr. Frankenstein.
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
Pro-life ping!
Embryonic stem cell research is very unlikely to ever lead to the curing of any illness. What it would lead to, and this is the goal,is huge amounts of taxpayer money to fund the research. Embryonic stem cell research is a red herring for money grubbers.
But ABC says that Kerry's distortions (LIES) don't matter.
Quite frankly, society can't afford immotality.
Quite frankly, society can't afford immortality.
You know, you're right. I stand chastened and corrected.
But for sheer ghoulishness, Kerry could go toe-to-toe with the Monster, if not Dr. F.
***Dr. Frankenstein is a much better man than John Kerry.***
I like your attitude. Thanks.
That's been the case for the last 25 years. It'll be the case for the next 25.
The irony being the evil drug/research companies who are keeping these folks alive and treated for HIV/AIDS and other illnesses donate to Republicans more than Democrats. Obviously they're not going to toss good money down a 'rat hole! Seems like a DISCONNECT to me.
BTTT
The goal of abortion activists' thrust for stem cell research is to the end that they will see the day in which they will be able to approach pregnant women on the street and convince them they will be great humanitarians if they will only go to the nearest abortion clinic and "contribute" their unborn babies to stem cell research.
Don't count on the OLD MEDIA to ask any questions of Mr. Kerry, it's a constant attack on President Bush!
I loved the way she posed that question. I've been waiting for someone to ask it in that way, but of course the media wouldn't. The truth is, the whole argument over embryonic stem cells has been co-opted by the pro-abortion crowd. They want to make abortion a noble thing.
BTW, I read (I can't remember where now) that there has been some promising research done with stem cells from adult fat tissue. That will sure throw some Libs into a quandry. Hmm - liposection or abortion? Which do I want gov't to pay for? :-)
Dr. Frankenstein wanted to advance the science of life. He had nothing to do with the Culture of Death, nothing to do with the destruction of innocent human life. He sought to create, not to destroy. For all his flaws, for all his hubris, Dr. Frankenstein was no Angel of Death.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.