1 posted on
10/11/2004 10:38:31 PM PDT by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
Excellent point.
We are able to kill and capture hundreds, perhaps even thousands of terrorists in Iraq.
Gen Franks said in his speech at the RNC: "We can fight the terrorists over there, or we can fight them over here. I prefer to fight them over there".
2 posted on
10/11/2004 10:42:58 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
To: quidnunc
3 posted on
10/11/2004 10:43:15 PM PDT by
cgk
(Calling it MemoGate is like saying Watergate had something to do w/ Water: WhistlingPasttheGraveyard)
To: quidnunc
4 posted on
10/11/2004 10:43:39 PM PDT by
AJS
To: quidnunc
Working for the Kerry campaign!
To: quidnunc
I could see Kerry blowing a question like that off with "Nobody knows" and then changing the subject back to Bush's
decisions on Iraq.
To: quidnunc
8 posted on
10/11/2004 10:46:53 PM PDT by
beaversmom
(Michael Medved has the Greatest radio show on GOD's Green Earth)
To: onef
9 posted on
10/11/2004 10:47:29 PM PDT by
beaversmom
(Michael Medved has the Greatest radio show on GOD's Green Earth)
To: quidnunc
This excerpt doesn't do this article justice. Go to the web site and read the whole thing for proper perspective.
11 posted on
10/11/2004 10:57:04 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(Of all the things i have lost in my life, I miss my mind the most.)
To: All
"Dennis Prager: Ask Kerry One Question What Would Zarqawi be Doing if he Weren't in Iraq"
OPINION-SPECULATION: He would be in Iran.
12 posted on
10/11/2004 11:09:11 PM PDT by
Cindy
To: quidnunc
I hope someone in the campaign reads this, it's a great question, would knock Kerry on his A$$
15 posted on
10/11/2004 11:40:38 PM PDT by
hipaatwo
To: quidnunc
Senator Kerry:
Exactly which strong national powers would you have brought into the coalition to pressure Iraq, in 2003 --and what would you have done with them? --and what would that have done?
17 posted on
10/12/2004 12:04:47 AM PDT by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
To: quidnunc
He'd be a guest on Oprah!
18 posted on
10/12/2004 12:06:00 AM PDT by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: quidnunc
Senator Kerry,
If as you say, you believe human life begins at conception,yet you are willing for innocent human life to be taken, what do you do with American's primal document, the Declaration of Independence, which points to our highest national principles, especially that we are "endowed by our Creator with... the Right to Life?"
19 posted on
10/12/2004 12:07:11 AM PDT by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
To: quidnunc
The president has said from the beginning that a major reason for invading Iraq was to bring the war to the terrorists, and that if we don't fight them on their soil, we will have to fight them on ours. What more needs to be said?
We brought it to them, it has prevented it from escalating here, sKerry is p!ssed, Dasshole is deeply saddened, and Pelosi is speechless.
Works for me!
20 posted on
10/12/2004 12:08:48 AM PDT by
EGPWS
To: quidnunc
Senator Kerry,
Why did you vote against Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm, in 1991?
21 posted on
10/12/2004 12:10:09 AM PDT by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
To: quidnunc
Good article.
Better to have the Roach Motel in Iraq than here.
To: quidnunc
Just look under the covers, and nothing Lurch says makes sense.
25 posted on
10/12/2004 1:33:20 AM PDT by
Ed_in_NJ
(I'm in old skivvies and New Jersey, and I approved this message.)
To: quidnunc
I've asked the same questions. To wit, if Iraq and Hussein had nothing to do with terrorism, then why are the Islamo-fascist terrorists fighting us there? Why would Al-Qaeda care that we deposed Hussein if he had no association with them and no terrorist ambitions? The obvious answer is that Hussein was up to his neck in terrorist activitiess, and his deposal was a severe blow to the international Islamo-fascist terrorist movement. That's why they are in Iraq fighting us.
27 posted on
10/12/2004 3:12:41 AM PDT by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: quidnunc
What would Zarqawi be doing now if he were not slaughtering people in Iraq?Playing rock the vote concerts with Bruce Springsteen.
31 posted on
10/12/2004 5:31:16 AM PDT by
Imaverygooddriver
( What`s the difference between Windows XP and John Kerry? Windows XP works once in a while.)
To: quidnunc
Another excellent link.
This explains perfectly why the terrorists are worried about Bush.
32 posted on
10/18/2004 11:59:54 PM PDT by
Mac017
(NZer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson