Posted on 10/15/2004 12:13:16 PM PDT by Maceman
Being a foreign correspondent in Baghdad these days is like being under virtual house arrest. Forget about the reasons that lured me to this job: a chance to see the world, explore the exotic, meet new people in far away lands, discover their ways and tell stories that could make a difference.
Little by little, day-by-day, being based in Iraq has defied all those reasons. I am house bound. I leave when I have a very good reason to and a scheduled interview. I avoid going to people's homes and never walk in the streets. I can't go grocery shopping any more, can't eat in restaurants, can't strike a conversation with strangers, can't look for stories, can't drive in any thing but a full armored car, can't go to scenes of breaking news stories, can't be stuck in traffic, can't speak English outside, can't take a road trip, can't say I'm an American, can't linger at checkpoints, can't be curious about what people are saying, doing, feeling. And can't and can't. There has been one too many close calls, including a car bomb so near our house that it blew out all the windows. So now my most pressing concern every day is not to write a kick-ass story but to stay alive and make sure our Iraqi employees stay alive. In Baghdad I am a security personnel first, a reporter second.
It's hard to pinpoint when the 'turning point' exactly began. Was it April when the Fallujah fell out of the grasp of the Americans? Was it when Moqtada and Jish Mahdi declared war on the U.S. military? Was it when Sadr City, home to ten percent of Iraq's population, became a nightly battlefield for the Americans? Or was it when the insurgency began spreading from isolated pockets in the Sunni triangle to include most of Iraq? Despite President Bush's rosy assessments, Iraq remains a disaster. If under Saddam it was a 'potential' threat, under the Americans it has been transformed to 'imminent and active threat,' a foreign policy failure bound to haunt the United States for decades to come.
Iraqis like to call this mess 'the situation.' When asked 'how are thing?' they reply: 'the situation is very bad."
What they mean by situation is this: the Iraqi government doesn't control most Iraqi cities, there are several car bombs going off each day around the country killing and injuring scores of innocent people, the country's roads are becoming impassable and littered by hundreds of landmines and explosive devices aimed to kill American soldiers, there are assassinations, kidnappings and beheadings. The situation, basically, means a raging barbaric guerilla war. In four days, 110 people died and over 300 got injured in Baghdad alone. The numbers are so shocking that the ministry of health -- which was attempting an exercise of public transparency by releasing the numbers -- has now stopped disclosing them.
Insurgents now attack Americans 87 times a day.
A friend drove thru the Shiite slum of Sadr City yesterday. He said young men were openly placing improvised explosive devices into the ground. They melt a shallow hole into the asphalt, dig the explosive, cover it with dirt and put an old tire or plastic can over it to signal to the locals this is booby-trapped. He said on the main roads of Sadr City, there were a dozen landmines per every ten yards. His car snaked and swirled to avoid driving over them. Behind the walls sits an angry Iraqi ready to detonate them as soon as an American convoy gets near. This is in Shiite land, the population that was supposed to love America for liberating Iraq.
For journalists the significant turning point came with the wave of abduction and kidnappings. Only two weeks ago we felt safe around Baghdad because foreigners were being abducted on the roads and highways between towns. Then came a frantic phone call from a journalist female friend at 11 p.m. telling me two Italian women had been abducted from their homes in broad daylight. Then the two Americans, who got beheaded this week and the Brit, were abducted from their homes in a residential neighborhood. They were supplying the entire block with round the clock electricity from their generator to win friends. The abductors grabbed one of them at 6 a.m. when he came out to switch on the generator; his beheaded body was thrown back near the neighborhoods.
The insurgency, we are told, is rampant with no signs of calming down. If any thing, it is growing stronger, organized and more sophisticated every day. The various elements within it-baathists, criminals, nationalists and Al Qaeda-are cooperating and coordinating.
I went to an emergency meeting for foreign correspondents with the military and embassy to discuss the kidnappings. We were somberly told our fate would largely depend on where we were in the kidnapping chain once it was determined we were missing. Here is how it goes: criminal gangs grab you and sell you up to Baathists in Fallujah, who will in turn sell you to Al Qaeda. In turn, cash and weapons flow the other way from Al Qaeda to the Baathisst to the criminals. My friend Georges, the French journalist snatched on the road to Najaf, has been missing for a month with no word on release or whether he is still alive.
America's last hope for a quick exit? The Iraqi police and National Guard units we are spending billions of dollars to train. The cops are being murdered by the dozens every day-over 700 to date -- and the insurgents are infiltrating their ranks. The problem is so serious that the U.S. military has allocated $6 million dollars to buy out 30,000 cops they just trained to get rid of them quietly.
As for reconstruction: firstly it's so unsafe for foreigners to operate that almost all projects have come to a halt. After two years, of the $18 billion Congress appropriated for Iraq reconstruction only about $1 billion or so has been spent and a check has now been reallocated for improving security, a sign of just how bad things are going here.
Oil dreams? Insurgents disrupt oil flow routinely as a result of sabotage and oil prices have hit record high of $49 a barrel. Who did this war exactly benefit? Was it worth it? Are we safer because Saddam is holed up and Al Qaeda is running around in Iraq? Iraqis say that thanks to America they got freedom in exchange for insecurity. Guess what? They say they'd take security over freedom any day, even if it means having a dictator ruler.
I heard an educated Iraqi say today that if Saddam Hussein were allowed to run for elections he would get the majority of the vote. This is truly sad. Then I went to see an Iraqi scholar this week to talk to him about elections here. He has been trying to educate the public on the importance of voting. He said, "President Bush wanted to turn Iraq into a democracy that would be an example for the Middle East. Forget about democracy, forget about being a model for the region, we have to salvage Iraq before all is lost."
One could argue that Iraq is already lost beyond salvation. For those of us on the ground it's hard to imagine what if any thing could salvage it from its violent downward spiral. The genie of terrorism, chaos and mayhem has been unleashed onto this country as a result of American mistakes and it can't be put back into a bottle. The Iraqi government is talking about having elections in three months while half of the country remains a 'no go zone'-out of the hands of the government and the Americans and out of reach of journalists. In the other half, the disenchanted population is too terrified to show up at polling stations. The Sunnis have already said they'd boycott elections, leaving the stage open for polarized government of Kurds and Shiites that will not be deemed as legitimate and will most certainly lead to civil war. I asked a 28-year-old engineer if he and his family would participate in the Iraqi elections since it was the first time Iraqis could to some degree elect a leadership. His response summed it all: "Go and vote and risk being blown into pieces or followed by the insurgents and murdered for cooperating with the Americans? For what? To practice democracy? Are you joking?"
Farnaz Fassihi, a Wall Street Journal reporter sent this report as an e-mail to friends.
Didnt read past the initial whinings.
I thought Detroit had been cleaned up--what with Lee Iacocoa. Sounds like Kutnrun better get the sheriff in there quick.
Yes. Yes, it is. Unless you read the entire article each and every time it is posted, you can't be considered a true Freeper.
If this were true, we'd already know about it!
I pray you are correct, my friend.
Newark is still there, and I dare say Iraq and the Iraqi's will be also.
Some places just aren't for the faint of heart.
I think it's a good idea to post this crap here. That way informed "Freepers" can supply links to acurate and positive stories out of Iraq through interaction with other "Freepers". That's the problem with MSM, this type of trash will be posted in an editorial with no chance to interact with others reading the article. The benefit is, when confronted by someone pro-left who quotes it's contents, we are better prepared to "properly educate" them by providing alternate and more accurate news sources.
I knew something was fishy about the story when he talked about his friend, the French journalist. I doubt any WSJ journalist has any French journalist friends.
I am more worried that someone in our military might snap when they come back from Iraq after viewing the bias in the media. They know what is happening on the ground and it isn't represented that way on the news.
It scares me to think that maybe one of our own troops might be so distraught with the left wing media distortion that maybe they might turn around and fire off their weapons at the hotels all the left wing liberals might be sleeping in and I wouldn't blame their emotions for wanting to do so.
This is not Vietnam and our soldiers have their hearts in this war. If our media isn't truthful and is responsible for poor journalism leading up to poor moral I wouldn't be surprised to see a disgruntled soldier walk into one of the offices of the media elite and shoot up the place unfortunately in the future or some other type of reprisal
"How about a pic. She was writing about how awful Afganistan was as well back in 2001. Take a look at one of her earlier articles:"
http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=4894
Excellent post, thank you for providing that link. I think this reporter should change careers and become a Fiction novelist. She is a great writer, but providing accurate and unbiased journalism? She has a definite problem with that.
But it will all be fixed if Kerry says a magic word. I guess that's what he's saying.
What he needs to say is that if Iraq can't be brought back into civilization, we have an obligation to obliterate it.
In reading Farnaz's three most recent articles at WSJ Online dated 9/15, 9/27 and 9/27, he does seem discouraged. He can be contacted based on his email address listed at the end of the stories there. In fairness to him, it needs to be verified whether this is his email and whether he has any additional comment. It would be helpful if other reporters in Iraq, including the WSJ, could verify if the following sentiment is widespread from this email.
"One could argue that Iraq is already lost beyond salvation. For those of us on the ground it's hard to imagine what if any thing could salvage it from its violent downward spiral."
My impression as just another john.q.public is that Iraq is very heavy lifting, but things are moving towards representative government. I think many positive stories could be juxtaposed against a negative-only outlook. These are the stories that come up when I do a search for "Farnaz Fassihi" using the WSJ Online search.
9/27/04 For Iraqi Families, 'Green Zone' Is Hardly an Oasis WSJ
9/27/04 Iraqis Seeking Relief Fulfill Wanderlust WSJ
9/15/04 Rebel Attacks In Iraq Reveal New Cooperation WSJ
8/30/04 Iraq Truce Leaves Rebel Cleric at Large WSJ
8/26/04 Keeper of the Keys To Shrine in Najaf Wants Them Back WSJ
8/20/04 Effort to Defeat Cleric's Militia Challenges Iraq WSJ
8/16/04 Najaf Remains Iraqi Flashpoint, As Talks Collapse WSJ
7/14/04 Finding No Solace WSJ
7/9/04 Dangerous Mission: Young Iraqi Judge Arraigns Mr. Hussein WSJ
7/2/04 Hussein Is Defiant in Court Date WSJ
6/30/04 Iraq to Take Custody of Hussein In Symbolic Show of Its Mettle WSJ
6/29/04 Coalition Cedes Control To Interim Iraqi Regime WSJ
6/29/04 Iraqi Bride's Checklist: Send Out Invitations, Worry About Security WSJ
6/25/04 Returning to Beirut, An Architect Has Designs on Its Future WSJ
6/22/04 Top U.S. Officers Must Testify In Abuse Trial WSJ
6/21/04 U.S. Troops Are Told To Focus on Training Iraqis WSJ
6/18/04 Iraq Official Seeks Tighter Security After 2 Bombings WSJ
6/14/04 Targeted Killings Are New Tactic Of Iraq Insurgents WSJ
6/1/04 Interim Cabinet Installed in Iraq Amid Bombings WSJ
6/1/04 Iraqi Leader Is Selected Amid Discord WSJ
5/28/04 U.S. to Suspend Najaf Offensive To Allow for Sadr Negotiations WSJ
5/21/04 Chalabi Suspected By U.S. of Passing Secrets to Iran WSJ
5/21/04 Finding U.S. Abuse in Iraq Left Red Cross Team in a Quandary WSJ
5/20/04 U.S. Holds First Trial on Iraq Abuse WSJ
5/17/04 Clashes Threaten Iraqi Shiite Areas WSJ
5/11/04 Red Cross Told Powell of Abuse Of Iraqi Prisoners in January WSJ
5/6/04 On Arab TV, Bush Tries To Appease Anger Over Abuse WSJ
5/3/04 U.S. Begins Prisoner-Abuse Probes WSJ
4/29/04 An Iraqi Aid Worker's Daily Struggles WSJ
4/22/04 Iraq Blast May Raise Religious Tension WSJ
There is a lot to be said about Iraq policy-after November 2.
Iranian woman, Muslim
That's all I need to know.
SHE is a girlie man.
Could someone please give some links to previous discussions on FR tearing apart this letter? I've searched w/o luck, and my loony uncles are constantly spamming me with this woman's letter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.