Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COOL TECH THIS WEEK: Antimatter Weapons, Space Wars, "Bunker Buster" Nukes
Military.com ^ | 10-16-2004 | Noah Shachtman

Posted on 10/17/2004 2:49:44 AM PDT by Navydog

No way. "The U.S. Air Force is quietly spending millions of dollars investigating ways to use a radical power source -- antimatter, the eerie 'mirror' of ordinary matter -- in future weapons," the San Francisco Chronicle reports.

Beyond the pointed-ear cool factor, antimatter would make a powerful weapon -- at least in theory. "If electrons or protons collide with their antimatter counterparts, they annihilate each other. In so doing, they unleash more energy than any other known energy source, even thermonuclear bombs," the Chron explains:

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: antimatter; nationaldefense; usaf; war; weapons

1 posted on 10/17/2004 2:49:44 AM PDT by Navydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Navydog

2 posted on 10/17/2004 2:52:15 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

Wait until ya get a look at the chameleon suit they're working on... You can find all sorts of neat stuff at F.A.S.


3 posted on 10/17/2004 2:54:57 AM PDT by wrbones (Where'd I put my tin foil hat....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

That is most logical.

4 posted on 10/17/2004 3:17:45 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar


5 posted on 10/17/2004 3:25:40 AM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and the Armed Forces ... Arnold and Zell too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites


6 posted on 10/17/2004 3:25:54 AM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and the Armed Forces ... Arnold and Zell too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fuzzy122

Enjoy it! LOL!


7 posted on 10/17/2004 3:29:24 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
"Thus, in principle, a positron bomb could be a step toward one of the military's dreams from the early Cold War: a so-called "clean" superbomb that could kill large numbers of soldiers without ejecting radioactive contaminants over the countryside."

I dont see how this will be helpful, we already have the capability to kill lots of soldiers but we wont do it because THEY are violating geneva conventions.

Unless we are willing to use the weapons we already have, it is a waste of time to even consider upgrading.

8 posted on 10/17/2004 3:35:51 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (I pray that Im wrong about alot of things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
"Enjoy it! LOL!"

Yipee!


9 posted on 10/17/2004 3:39:02 AM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and the Armed Forces ... Arnold and Zell too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

I disagree completely.

We must have the resources to obliterate our enemy.

If the military leaders and the executive leaders choose to use it, we have it available.


10 posted on 10/17/2004 3:46:34 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: AKSurprise

so do we get lazer tanks and particle cannons? i really mis those prizm tanks that were in command and conquer red alert2
I play way too much command and conquer generals.


12 posted on 10/17/2004 4:31:52 AM PDT by Kewlhand`tek (What the hell was that? I hope it was outgoing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

The entire point of this weapon system is that you can obliterate your enemy and occupy hsi former terrain and beging reconstruction almost immediately. Whereas ith current nuke technology, the terrain is unusable for a rather lengthy period of time.


13 posted on 10/17/2004 4:39:03 AM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Navydog

Larry Niven ping for a TC weapon

(total conversion)


14 posted on 10/17/2004 11:02:43 AM PDT by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson