Skip to comments.
UN INspectors Found Nothing At Al-Qaqaa ON March 8, 2003
Posted on 10/26/2004 12:31:01 PM PDT by Prince Charles
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-171 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Saw that. Why the Bush team isn't responding to this is a mystery.
61
posted on
10/26/2004 1:11:05 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Prince Charles
Careful, folks. "Nothing" refers to WMD, not RDX or HMX. The "white powder that appeared to be used for explosives" mentioned in this release could actually be the explosives the Times was talking about.
62
posted on
10/26/2004 1:11:16 PM PDT
by
Phocion
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We ain't gonna take the lies from the liberals any more
They want a fight ... They got one!
63
posted on
10/26/2004 1:12:58 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(This Sept 10th attitude is no way to protect our country)
To: Prince Charles
64
posted on
10/26/2004 1:13:27 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Prince Charles
You are a prince indeed. I knight thee, Sir Prince Charles (is that redundant?). Thou name shall be spoken in kind with the great Buckhead and the honourable Howlin. We giveth all thanks and glory to God, and to one of His most wonderous gifts that humbleth our enemies and aideth our friends -- Lexis-Nexis.
To: Prince Charles; jmstein7; OXENinFLA; Howlin; Mo1; Grampa Dave; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
To the BM (Big media )
66
posted on
10/26/2004 1:15:27 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: Rakkasan1
67
posted on
10/26/2004 1:16:45 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: StAnDeliver; Buckhead; TankerKC
Where is buckhead and tankerkc?
68
posted on
10/26/2004 1:18:09 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: Prince Charles
The DemonRATS will say that this just states the UN inspectors did not find any CHEMICAL or BIOLOGICAL weapons.
This report does raise the question as to why the UN weapons inspectors did not check on the status of the HDX/RDX they now allege was there a few months before.
To: Prince Charles
70
posted on
10/26/2004 1:23:16 PM PDT
by
EdReform
(Have you seen FAHRENHYPE 9/11? - www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1240926/posts)
To: Mo1
To: All
***this article does NOT disprove the NYT story***
However, this one does:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1257780/posts
Why? This Lexis-Nexis find is in the context of WMD's and not finding WMD's specifically. The linked article there talks about weapons in the context of WMD's and explosives in general. And, the 3rd found white powder, not the stuff supposedly missing.
The linked article is a legit find and supports NBC's piece from last night.
Send it to various news orgs.
72
posted on
10/26/2004 1:28:00 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
73
posted on
10/26/2004 1:28:20 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(This Sept 10th attitude is no way to protect our country)
To: michigander
Col. John Peabody, engineer brigade commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, said troops found thousands of five-centimetre by 12-centimetre boxes, each containing three vials of white powder, together with documents written in Arabic that dealt with how to engage in chemical warfare. A senior U.S. official familiar with initial testing said the powder was believed to be explosives. The finding would be consistent with the plant's stated production capabilities in the field of basic raw materials for explosives and propellants. I believe you are right...but I don't see how thousands of tiny bxes add up to 380 tons. Nor does it prove it were still there April 10.
To: lugsoul
Finding "nothing" would seem to indicate that they didn't find what they were looking for, i.e. WMD. Multiple other reports state that the seals on the bunkers containing the high explosives were still in place at the time of this inspection. In other words, this article doesn't establish that the explosives weren't there in March 2003, and various others say they were.I have to agree. In fact, it would have been news if the seals had been broken and the explosives missing at that point.
75
posted on
10/26/2004 1:37:40 PM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
("Don't bother giving me liberty: I'll take it for myself, thanks.")
To: Phocion
'Careful, folks. "Nothing" refers to WMD, not RDX or HMX. The "white powder that appeared to be used for explosives" mentioned in this release could actually be the explosives the Times was talking about.'
Ok, riddle me this. We're talking 380 TONS OF EXPLOSIVES
When IAEA said 'NOTHING', how could they have meant nothing at all and NOT mention 380 TONS of explosives?
Besides all that. After the site was taken and "secured" by the army, no chance in hell anybody could just come by and take 380 TONS of explosives from there! That's totally impossible even by the standards of those who tell stories about Ali Baba and the 40 thieves.
76
posted on
10/26/2004 1:39:48 PM PDT
by
concan
To: Mo1
77
posted on
10/26/2004 1:40:34 PM PDT
by
Fred Fighter
(Don't trust me! Read for yourself.)
To: concan
Um... I think that's the point. The site wasn't "secured."
78
posted on
10/26/2004 1:42:35 PM PDT
by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: Prince Charles
Lexis-Nexis Prince Charles gem bump
79
posted on
10/26/2004 1:43:12 PM PDT
by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
To: Fred Fighter
Somebody please tell the Pentagon...
80
posted on
10/26/2004 1:44:06 PM PDT
by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson