Posted on 11/01/2004 6:34:54 AM PST by Agitate
Is your protest vote worth 4 years of John Kerry? Are you willing to risk appeasing terrorists, sellout to the UN and the EU, more taxes, less for the military, homosexual marriage and activist judges who will be there long after the president is gone, your for vote today? Sometimes you have to lose a battle to win the final war. Is a vote for a candidate who will not win worth 4 years of Kerry’s extreme liberalism? I hope not.
The only candidate that a person agrees with 100% on the issues is themselves.
The only candidate who can win tomorrow are Bush or Kerry.!
Volunteer as a poll watcher tomorrow (especially in swing states ... OH, PA, NJ, etc). Don't let Kerry steal the election.
Tomorrow's election: SHOCK AND AWE.!
You're wrong. Remember the margins by which New Mexico and Florida were decided in 2000?
Every single vote is important in this race. If you honestly think taking the risk of putting Lurch in office is worth voting your "conscience" then you've quite honestly lost your mind.
Flame suit on and ready.
That's what we were told 4 years ago. I am tired of the RNC moving more and more to the left each election. I will vote for Bush but not because he is conservative. I just don't want Kerry and the liberal media to win.
It would be helpful if someone could list all of the conservative things Bush has done the last 4 years compared with all of the centrist positions. I don't want to see statements he made, but actual policies (and don't include the WOT, we already know about that).
The true colors of the anti freedom people show themselves every time. I'm sure the author of this thread appreciates your attack on the people he is trying to convince to the Republican side.
No deep thinking in your comments.
Every time? Or THIS time?
I am voting Bush my friend...
But your simple analysis of NM for instance is flawed...the fact Bush lost NM isnt because some 200 odd voters voted Libertarian or what not...
ITS BECAUSE BUSH DIDNT GET ANOTHER 300 VOTERS TO THE POLLS
Its that simple
I'm libertarian, but I think the libertarian party is morally bankrupt! They're pro-baby-murder and pro-gay and pro-druggie! ICK!
Will do!
I'm sick of the trolls, and I don't care whether they're Democrats or "Libertarians." For the sake of the next four years, a vote against Bush is a vote against conservatism.
Keep in mind the small margins by which Bush won Floriduh and Gore won New Mexico in 2000. What if those 500+ voters in Florida had voted for Browne? What if the 300+ votes in New Mexico that made the difference in that state had been cast for Buchanan?
Contrary to your opinion, I'm not 'attacking' freedom. I'm attempting to preserve it by keeping John F'n Kerry out of the Oval Office. The action of casting a vote against Bush, whether it's for Kerry, Peroutka, or Badnarik, is the true attack on freedom in this election.
Voting Constitution may make a person feel better, but in the end it is a vote for the very opposite, John Kerry.
We don't life in a country with a parliamentarian form of government. If we did, the Constitution Party could have delegates elected which would align with other parties to form a majority. As it is, the Constitution Party comprises only protest votes, and no one will be listening, no pro-life Supreme Court justice will be nominated, and no pro-abortion laws will be stopped. One had might as well spit against the wind.
The Republican Party is the place for pro-lifers and those who believe in personal responsibility. The GOP comprises different groups allied against the entitlement party of the left. It is the only place, at the time, for those who treasure the Judeo-Christian values of our founding.
Oh I get it...because someone doesn't toe your line, they are immature and need to GROW UP!
How persuasive...congratulations on your depth and breadth of articulating the argument....and for the last time...
I have always voted republican [since Reagan's first term], and will always vote republican
Naturally, I'm speculating.
But what you need to realize with this comment...
ITS BECAUSE BUSH DIDNT GET ANOTHER 300 VOTERS TO THE POLLS
...is that you are, also.
I prefer to leave no margin for error. Not only do we need to turn out every possible Bush voter, but we also need to convert those who think they're "taking a stand for conservatism" by voting against the only viable conservative candidate.
So, let me see if I understand - you'd rather have sKerry and universal health care where EVERYTHING is "free" - except it'll be paid for out of your pocket - prices up, quality down?
("fromer"?)
I sent a letter last night to the person in MI who also has been involved with both parties over the years asking for a voice of sanity to his long list of followers. He complied an wrote a letter and endorsed George W. Bush and sent it to his followers. I am at work now so I don't have a copy of his letter but it was pretty well thought out.
so you prefer socialized medicine and full control of the medical industry by the goverment?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.