Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2004 6:59:40 PM PST by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zechariah11

I've gotten numerous republican political mailers with their recommendations on the ballot issues. Not one of mine promote a "yes" on 71.


2 posted on 11/01/2004 7:03:21 PM PST by umgud (Donate monthly, don't be a Freeploader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11
McClintock

Search feature

3 posted on 11/01/2004 7:03:35 PM PST by martin_fierro (Gig I must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

Vote NO on 66. Arnold says so.


4 posted on 11/01/2004 7:04:31 PM PST by elizabetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

Positions advocated by the Ca Republican party:
1A support
59 support
60 support
60A support
61 oppose
62 oppose
63 oppose
64 support
65 oppose
66 oppose
67 oppose
68 oppose
69 support
70 oppose
71 oppose
72 oppose


5 posted on 11/01/2004 7:06:02 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

No on 71, it's a scam, it will add $6 billion(including interest) to our hugh debt.


6 posted on 11/01/2004 7:06:11 PM PST by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

Propositions are easy.....if they are in any way going to cost you (the taxpayer) any additional money via bonds or higher taxes, just vote NO.
The stem cell prop is a $3 billion state program. Just what California needs....another state program. hah
I sincerely believe that we pay way too much in California.


7 posted on 11/01/2004 7:07:28 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11; fooman
I am a research scientist in California working sometimes in the biology arena. I am voting against 71 as it is welfare for biologists and in a bankrupt state we can't afford to throw 6 billion dollars towards dubious research because it is politically correct.

Presently nobody is prevented from working on embryonic stem cells on their own dime. None of the results from embryonic stem cells shows promise, and if they did they would require a continuing dose of immune suppression drugs to keep the tissue from being rejected. Accordingly, nobody is willing to do the work without grant money. The possibility of a big score just isn't there.

The hot action is in adult stem cells from bone marrow and fat. The upside of this research is that the resulting tissue is your genetic material and won't be rejected. People are risking their own money to research this because there is the potential of a big payoff.

Executive summary: When the potholes are fixed then we can afford to burn cash on dubious research.

regards,

9 posted on 11/01/2004 7:08:41 PM PST by Mycroft Holmes (Fnord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11
Analysis by the conservative Sacramento Union.
11 posted on 11/01/2004 7:09:46 PM PST by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

Vote "F*** NO" on everything.


13 posted on 11/01/2004 7:11:49 PM PST by Poohbah (SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER...SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

Via "Google" New search with "Mel Gibson stem cell" as the search term gets you this:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=Mel+Gibson+stem+cell&btnG=Search+News

It's very simple. Some good hearted people have joined with high-profile
folks with long-term diseases and have been hijacked by a group who see a nice way
to tap the California state taxpayers for $3 BILLION DOLLARS and another
$3 BILLION DOLLARS in interest to pay for research that has yet to produce a therapeutic
cure...in stark contrast to the work on Adult Stem Cells.

If this research was such a good investment, Tereza Heinz-Kerry, Bill Gates,
and other venture capitalists would be pouring $$$ into it.
And they are NOT.


27 posted on 11/01/2004 7:22:11 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

NO on all of them.


28 posted on 11/01/2004 7:22:13 PM PST by philetus (Zell Miller - One of the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

I got this mailer too. Look at the fine print. It says "Guide for Republicans" on the front... but on the back, at the bottom, who paid for the thing? NOT the GOP! It is some group called "Get the Vote Out" or something.

Don't be fooled by this thing - chuck it NOW!


29 posted on 11/01/2004 7:22:46 PM PST by Jerez2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

And for anyone in the LA area:

Prop A: NO (want to increase sales tax by 1/2 cent!)
Prop O: NO (bond)


31 posted on 11/01/2004 7:23:38 PM PST by FairOpinion (GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Under what possible definition of the Responsibilities of State Government is a State that is $36Billion in the red screwing around doing something that clearly and solidly belongs in the Private Sector?

WE AIN'T GOT THE DAMN MONEY! PERIOD!!!


32 posted on 11/01/2004 7:26:00 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The cool points are out the window and you got me all twisted up in the game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zechariah11

If it wants money, by any means, VOTE NO!


44 posted on 11/01/2004 8:12:10 PM PST by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson