Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Living Poor, Voting Rich
NY Times ^ | November 3, 2004 | NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

Posted on 11/03/2004 10:07:07 AM PST by neverdem

OP-ED COLUMNIST

In the aftermath of this civil war that our nation has just fought, one result is clear: the Democratic Party's first priority should be to reconnect with the American heartland.

I'm writing this on tenterhooks on Tuesday, without knowing the election results. But whether John Kerry's supporters are now celebrating or seeking asylum abroad, they should be feeling wretched about the millions of farmers, factory workers and waitresses who ended up voting - utterly against their own interests - for Republican candidates.

One of the Republican Party's major successes over the last few decades has been to persuade many of the working poor to vote for tax breaks for billionaires. Democrats are still effective on bread-and-butter issues like health care, but they come across in much of America as arrogant and out of touch the moment the discussion shifts to values.

"On values, they are really noncompetitive in the heartland," noted Mike Johanns, a Republican who is governor of Nebraska. "This kind of elitist, Eastern approach to the party is just devastating in the Midwest and Western states. It's very difficult for senatorial, Congressional and even local candidates to survive."

In the summer, I was home - too briefly - in Yamhill, Ore., a rural, working-class area where most people would benefit from Democratic policies on taxes and health care. But many of those people disdain Democrats as elitists who empathize with spotted owls rather than loggers.

One problem is the yuppification of the Democratic Party. Thomas Frank, author of the best political book of the year, "What's the Matter With Kansas: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America," says that Democratic leaders have been so eager to win over suburban professionals that they have lost touch with blue-collar America.

"There is a very upper-middle-class flavor to liberalism, and that's just bound to rub average people the wrong way," Mr. Frank said. He notes that Republicans have used "culturally powerful but content-free issues" to connect to ordinary voters.

To put it another way, Democrats peddle issues, and Republicans sell values. Consider the four G's: God, guns, gays and grizzlies.

One-third of Americans are evangelical Christians, and many of them perceive Democrats as often contemptuous of their faith. And, frankly, they're often right. Some evangelicals take revenge by smiting Democratic candidates.

Then we have guns, which are such an emotive issue that Idaho's Democratic candidate for the Senate two years ago, Alan Blinken, felt obliged to declare that he owned 24 guns "and I use them all." He still lost.

As for gays, that's a rare wedge issue that Democrats have managed to neutralize in part, along with abortion. Most Americans disapprove of gay marriage but do support some kind of civil unions (just as they oppose "partial birth" abortions but don't want teenage girls to die from coat-hanger abortions).

Finally, grizzlies - a metaphor for the way environmentalism is often perceived in the West as high-handed. When I visited Idaho, people were still enraged over a Clinton proposal to introduce 25 grizzly bears into the wild. It wasn't worth antagonizing most of Idaho over 25 bears.

"The Republicans are smarter," mused Oregon's governor, Ted Kulongoski, a Democrat. "They've created ... these social issues to get the public to stop looking at what's happening to them economically."

"What we once thought - that people would vote in their economic self-interest - is not true, and we Democrats haven't figured out how to deal with that."

Bill Clinton intuitively understood the challenge, and John Edwards seems to as well, perhaps because of their own working-class origins. But the party as a whole is mostly in denial.

To appeal to middle America, Democratic leaders don't need to carry guns to church services and shoot grizzlies on the way. But a starting point would be to shed their inhibitions about talking about faith, and to work more with religious groups.

Otherwise, the Democratic Party's efforts to improve the lives of working-class Americans in the long run will be blocked by the very people the Democrats aim to help.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: economy; republicanparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
I think this a good example of how the dems know little, think less, and then have the gall to nominate a traitor while we have this little problem with terrorism. Dumb as a rock!
1 posted on 11/03/2004 10:07:08 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Clueless seems to be a philosophy among them these days...


2 posted on 11/03/2004 10:08:25 AM PST by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They just plain can't get past the belief that religion is a mental illness to be cured by patient therapy. That people would actually base important decisions on religion seems insane to them.


3 posted on 11/03/2004 10:09:03 AM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Dumb as a rock!

Yeah, but I wouldn't want them any other way.

4 posted on 11/03/2004 10:09:43 AM PST by Right Wing Professor (Fingers now uncrossed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Sounds like Jimmuh Carter blaming America for its "crisis of confidence"


5 posted on 11/03/2004 10:09:53 AM PST by kahoutek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Gay Marriage Bans Gain Wide Support in 10 States
6 posted on 11/03/2004 10:10:59 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I'm writing this on tenterhooks on Tuesday, without knowing the election results. But whether John Kerry's supporters are now celebrating or seeking asylum abroad

John Kerry's supporters need to seriously consider the possibility of asylums, whether here or abroad. n :)

7 posted on 11/03/2004 10:11:15 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

More of that "What's the matter with Kansas" nonsense. As long as liberal elite buy into their neo-communist belief that all politics are about class warfare and that religion is just a tool that the borgeous use to opiate the masses, they are doomed to failure.


8 posted on 11/03/2004 10:11:27 AM PST by Jibaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I have wanted to put this out for a while and this seems the perfect place. I, making significantly less than the median income, got money back in the tax cuts. (I think John Kerry's haircut costs more than my rent).

Obe thing that was eliminated in 2001 was considering graduate school benefits from employers as taxable income. Because of this, I was able to afford getting a master's degree, which, in turn allowed me to earn a higher income.

I am closer to the median income now, however, nowhere near the top two percent and I benfited GREATLY. I am sick of them saying only the rich benefited, because it just isn't true.


9 posted on 11/03/2004 10:12:23 AM PST by PrincessB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Another failure to recognize a clear fact - most people care more about their values than their value.


10 posted on 11/03/2004 10:12:31 AM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Hmmm. I agree. The people in the heartland are too principled and moral to allow their votes to bought by what these nitwits think are in our best economic interests.


11 posted on 11/03/2004 10:12:38 AM PST by Grit ('For the love of my brother, and for the love of my country.' - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Man, they just don't get it.

It's about PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY on every issue.

All the government programs in the world won't make people's individuals lives better.

We believe in people much more than they do. That's why we won.


12 posted on 11/03/2004 10:12:45 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (Tell Fox you want the Truth, not "Fair & Balanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Dumb as a rock!"

Jerk don't get it, that's for sure.


13 posted on 11/03/2004 10:12:54 AM PST by jocon307 (Don't let Australia down: Re-elect President Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The New York Times and its typical writers like Kristof are every bit the equivalent of the opponents of Galileo who clung to their belief that the Earth was the center of the universe.

They have built their lives around, and vested their emotions, in a set of ideas that are utterly and absolutely false. If they ever faced up to the truth, they would crumble into dust like the Nazis in the final scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest, "Roosting Chickens, and Results of the 2004 Election"

14 posted on 11/03/2004 10:13:43 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"civil war our nation has just fought"......I'm sorry, but this guy is obviously an ignorant mental case.


15 posted on 11/03/2004 10:15:05 AM PST by goodnesswins (WOOHHOOOOOOOO........FOUR ......MORE.....YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

As the Left begins its navel-gazing, it is interesting to note that they will not be able to change their old ways of thinking. Their only questions will be: How can we "buy" Red State votes? Totally clueless.


16 posted on 11/03/2004 10:15:18 AM PST by Grit ('For the love of my brother, and for the love of my country.' - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

agreed. that is the issue my wife and i have decided is throwing the dems off. and i hope they continue with their delusions.


17 posted on 11/03/2004 10:15:22 AM PST by jays911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The idea that people vote their economic class is a presumption of those with a Marxist mindset.

Whenever things don't fit the presumption, they still don't question the presumption, but only wonder why people aren't cooperating.

They also don't explain why the "super-rich" (Soros, Gates, Hollywood left, etc.) vote "poor."
18 posted on 11/03/2004 10:15:30 AM PST by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I am in awe of how condescending this piece is.


19 posted on 11/03/2004 10:15:58 AM PST by kellynch (Whining about income inequality is a cop-out. -- Walter E. Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Kristof never fails to amaze me. He lives in a different country than we do. He never will get it. Needs to move to France with the rest of his ilk.


20 posted on 11/03/2004 10:16:17 AM PST by revealerls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson