Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Senate Gains in 2006 May Overshadow gains in 2004 (analysis)
November 4th, 2004 | Remember_Salamis

Posted on 11/04/2004 12:13:38 AM PST by Remember_Salamis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj

As far as Tennessee goes, the Democrats may not nominate Harold Ford Jr, but what about Reps. Jim Cooper or Lincoln Davis? I imagine one of them could give us some trouble.


81 posted on 11/10/2004 7:46:01 PM PST by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Congratulations to Senator-elect David Vitter, the first GOP senator from LA since Reconstruction!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe

Ford poses as a moderate Rat but he's basically a liberal. Plus, he's from Memphis. He couldn't win statewide.


82 posted on 11/10/2004 7:51:05 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Southack
After their consecutive drubbings in 2002 and 2004, the Dems have two options: repeat more of the same...or change themselves.

Excellent analysis - I agree largely because I believe that they won't change. To me, they're like drug addicts, hooked on the narcotics of socialism/communism, anti-Americanism and elitism. Already we're seeing the Dims thinking that once again, their problem is that they didn't get their message out. So they're still clinging to their tattered fantasy of an America consisting of a huge "silent majority" of far left radicals, cowed into not speaking out by legions of frothing Bible-bangin' ignoramuses who've been whipped into a orgy of hate by Chimpy Bushitler.

It's so much easier for them to believe they were foully done in by an evil idiot savant leading a bunch of toothless hayseeds into voting against their own best interests. This way they don't have to face the fact that their playbook is old and worn out, their message and spokespersons are repulsive to average Americans, their ideas (what they have of those) are stale and already proven to be utter failures. They can claim everyone else is an easily misled idiot, and cling to their illusion of moral and intellectual superiority.

The democrats will continue to marginalize themselves as they become increasingly shrill and paranoid and anti-American, to the point where they will openly be the party of the ultra-rich trust-funders, the trial lawyers, the jihadists, the Hollywood degenerates and the professional victim lobbies. And until a large number of the old party apparatchiks die off, they'll be consigned to significant minority status.

But they'll feel really good about themselves as they spew their bile and hatred.

83 posted on 11/10/2004 8:28:48 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (It's not evidence of wrongdoing just because Democrats don't like the outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

The last time they nominated Cooper in '94, he went down in flames, though I'm sure he'd like to be a Senator (which his much-more Conservative daddy (Gov. Prentice Cooper) was denied by Gore, Sr. back in 1958), but I still think he's a tad too liberal. Lincoln Davis might be a good choice for them, but he may be too Conservative for the nomination. His reelection campaign made you believe he was a Conservative Republican. The question is whether or not all 3 (Ford, Cooper & Davis) decide to jump into the fray and bloody each other for the nomination. At this point, it is ours to lose.


84 posted on 11/10/2004 9:25:41 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Rally Cry In '05: No Justices - No PEACE !*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: mull
Would love to see either Pataki or Rudy take on Hillary. They will both have to do some soul searching because 1) there is no way either can win the '08 GOP nomination and 2) if they both decide to run, as has been speculated, they will drain each others resources. Rudy would make the better candidate though.

Why wouldn't Rudy prefer running for governor? He's an aggressive executive type guy, not a passive deliberator. And the governor's chair in Albany is a better launch pad for an eventual presidential campaign than a Senate seat.

85 posted on 11/10/2004 9:38:15 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ; Remember_Salamis
20 on a scale of 100 makes one a conservative? Being 10 points to the right of Hillary makes one a conservative?

It's a sad state of affairs when simply being patriotic can move a Democrat from the "liberal" to the "moderate" column.

Perhaps, it would be best to think of Democrats like Lieberman and Bayh as "patriotic liberals" rather than "moderates".

86 posted on 11/10/2004 9:46:48 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Kay Bailey Hutcheson is rumored to be considering running for governor in two years. She is tired of D.C. and ready to come home. I believe she will not be running for re-election.

She and her husband adopted a child and that has a big influence on her wanting to come home.

87 posted on 11/10/2004 9:56:19 PM PST by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I remember you! Where you been?


88 posted on 11/10/2004 10:03:10 PM PST by ForOurFuture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Nethercutt will win in 2006. Guaranteed.

No way.

89 posted on 11/10/2004 10:19:15 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

I cannot stand Ford. He smiles but the eyes can't hide what's in his soul and it's not good.


90 posted on 11/10/2004 10:30:22 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ForOurFuture

Who, me ? I've been here. I know your handle, too... So are we friends or foes ? :-P


91 posted on 11/10/2004 11:05:09 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Rally Cry In '05: No Justices - No PEACE !*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: okie01

"Perhaps, it would be best to think of Democrats like Lieberman and Bayh as "patriotic liberals" rather than "moderates".


-- Classic NeoConservatives before their conversion. I'm thinking Irv Kristol, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and other "liberal hawks" who dies out in the 1970s.


92 posted on 11/10/2004 11:29:03 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Regardless, it's a safe GOP seat because I think Henry Bonilla would win this seat in a walk.

In fact, I owuldn't be surpised if KBH is nudged out of the Senate and into the Governor's house just to make room for Bonilla. The GOP would be completely insane NOT to put a popular conservative hispanic in the Senate. Bonilla has an excellent conservative voting record too.


93 posted on 11/10/2004 11:41:42 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Brillant - finally someone who gets it!
94 posted on 11/10/2004 11:53:36 PM PST by UMFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

I like your analysis overall, but:

"Loss - John Corzine of New Jersey – Backlash Alert! The backlash against McGAYvey will break the democratic political machine in Jersey. Corzine will be the first victim."

Heh. There doesn't appear to be any such thing as "backlash" for New Jersey Democrats. These are the people who voted for Lautenberg -after- being put on the ticket illegally, remember? And they voted for Kerry -after- the debacles of both Lautenberg and McGreevey. No, I'd strike this one off your list as anything like a sure bet. Especially when you take into consideration that other than a couple of good House members (Chris Smith rocks), the Republican party in New Jersey is effectively a dummy corporation set up by the Democrats to make sure they are never seriously opposed. There is no such thing as a Republican in New Jersey who might run for that election with anything resembling name recognition, either, at least that I know of.

Qwinn


95 posted on 11/11/2004 12:03:18 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Corzine will win. JErsey is a Dem state.

If Bush pushes for amnesty for illegals and Specter is on th Judiciary comm - the Republicans will lose seats in the Senate.

It looks like Bush is already in "screw the base" mode with his plan for amnesty for illegals (criminals).


96 posted on 11/11/2004 6:25:06 AM PST by FrankRepublican (Arlen Specter = Ted Kennedy Democrat Bush = Open Borders w/ Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Besides Corzine, who the majority here think will retain, I would say Republicans picking up WhineSwine's seat here in "Kal-ee-for-nee-yah" is a medical-marijuana hallucination. The Republican party here in the Golden State are about as unified and organized as a room full of cats.


97 posted on 11/11/2004 8:33:34 AM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

With GWB winning 30 states in 2000 and 31 this time, it's not surprising that the Senate will continue to trend Republican.


98 posted on 11/11/2004 8:40:01 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

The rallying cry should be: "60 in '06"


99 posted on 11/11/2004 8:40:15 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The most effective launch pad for any '08 bid would be to take on Hillary and win. As of right now, Hillary is the Dims leading candidate for '08 and will most likely remain that way until the primaries. For either Pataki or Rudy to knock off their top candidate would earn them major points within the GOP rank and file. Barring a Hillary scalping, Rudy and Pataki have slim to no chance of earning the GOP '08 nomination due to their liberal stands on social issues.

A similar situation occurred here in Massachusetts back in '96 when Weld took on Kerry. It was said at the time that the winner of the race would be presidential ticket material. Kerry's win effectively finished off Weld as any kind of national contender and established Kerry as a potential VP candidate in '00 (some say he was runner up to Lieberman for the '00 VP slot) and eventual nominee in '04.


100 posted on 11/11/2004 8:46:36 AM PST by mull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson