Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/04/2004 9:16:20 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: mrustow

Hollywood take heart!

You still have Martin Sheen!


Bwaaahaaaa!


2 posted on 11/04/2004 9:19:13 AM PST by old3030 (Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped -- Elbert Hubbard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Good reason for the Christians to come out even harder for the next election. Their belief in God is being refereed to as irrelevant.
3 posted on 11/04/2004 9:20:24 AM PST by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow


4 posted on 11/04/2004 9:21:02 AM PST by Diogenesis (Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

That 5 week hostage crisis the Dem's held upon America in 2000 will be forever "THE MARK OF CAIN" on the SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY. I pray a Zell Miller type democrat party will erase that mark.


5 posted on 11/04/2004 9:21:57 AM PST by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Great as always.


6 posted on 11/04/2004 9:23:08 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

The resounding NO that this gaggle of sillys is hearing is not religion-based values per se, although there is a great part of the electorate who are religious.

The NO is a resounding denunciation of Socialism.

Socialism is inimical to not only those of faith, but also to those who believe in this Constitution, free enterprise and personal responsibility.

If I wanted limitations on my ability to succeed and pursue goals, I would move to France.


7 posted on 11/04/2004 9:23:34 AM PST by OpusatFR (Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swill leftist garbage again. Got it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow; All

There are some "believing" AND "analytical" Christians I know, who after finishing with Chrissy, Ms. Matthews would be too ashamed to say his own name...if he remembered it...


8 posted on 11/04/2004 9:27:05 AM PST by Christian4Bush (President George W. Bush. Misunderestimate him at your own peril!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Rather reproved Bradley, "Now, Ed Bradley, who does not have a degree in math ..."

Bradley: "But I used to teach math years ago."

And where did you get your math degree, Dan? Clearly there wasn't a math requirement for that journalism degree from Sam Houston State College. Ed taught math, Dan.

What a putz. A fourth-grader could solve this kind of story problem:

If Candidate A is ahead of Candidate B by 170,000 votes and there are 169,000 votes remaining to be counted, which Candidate will win the election?" *sheesh*

9 posted on 11/04/2004 9:27:22 AM PST by macbee ("Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
At 4 a.m., Rather went off the air without ever giving Ohio to George W. Bush.

I kept going over to SeeBS becuase I was getting a huge kick out of their bias. Watching Blather was like watching the tape of something that happened three hours ago. It was hilarious. I hope somebody does a documentary about the MSM's behavior on this election night.

10 posted on 11/04/2004 9:27:33 AM PST by capydick ("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." --President Dwight Eisenho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Temple Owl
At about 3:33 a.m., Rather's lefty colleague, Ed Bradley, tried to explain to him that Bush had taken Ohio. Bradley showed that Bush's expanding lead in Ohio, at that point 170,000 votes, was such that even if every provisional vote went for Kerry, Bush would still win. "If you believe these numbers, we estimate that Bush rather solidly has won Ohio."

Rather reproved Bradley, "Now, Ed Bradley, who does not have a degree in math ..."

Bradley: "But I used to teach math years ago."

11 posted on 11/04/2004 9:27:55 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Yesterday Michael Medved played part of a conversation between Katie Couric and Chris Matthews...unbelievable what all Matthews said! Things like "they're a lot of just 'simple' people", "...actually BELIEVE that God created everything in 7 days", etc. Again, UNBELIEVABLE!! Then Medved played the theme from "deliverance"...the banjo playing idiot thing. LOL!!

If Katie or Chris just happens to be reading this...there are actually quite a few of us out here in the red states who have indoor plumbing and we do not handle snakes in our church services.


12 posted on 11/04/2004 9:28:40 AM PST by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Go to billoreilly.com and vote against the msm.


13 posted on 11/04/2004 9:29:23 AM PST by Woogit (IN GOD I TRUST...NO MATTER WHAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

If you are self-annointed, you are no star. But you might be a stooge.


14 posted on 11/04/2004 9:30:31 AM PST by auboy (Bye bye Daschle, bye bye Kerry, you can go now, please don't tarry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
These clods have drawn the battle lines. It's them versus America.

We'll see who wins.

15 posted on 11/04/2004 9:32:09 AM PST by IronJack (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

It has always been this way.


18 posted on 11/04/2004 9:36:49 AM PST by JRPerry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

What's a "mandate", anyway, and does a 3% margin of victory in the popular vote, a 5% margin in the Senate, and about a 4% margin in the House qualify as one?


21 posted on 11/04/2004 9:40:42 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

>


Democrat dead-enders?

The Dems are starting to remind me of the
Baathist party in Iraq


22 posted on 11/04/2004 9:41:20 AM PST by oldbrowser (the people have spoken............loud and clear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Media Stars Refuse to Concede Election; Denigrate Evangelicals; Deny Bush a “Mandate”

...and continue to amaze observers by making themselves even more irrelevant.

25 posted on 11/04/2004 9:45:10 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
On NBC with Mathews, Today host Katie Couric, who rose to fame playing the sweet, all-American girl, before revealing her mean streak, refused to concede the election. That was one hour after Kerry had called Bush to congratulate the latter on his victory. When Mathews noted that Bush had won a majority of the popular vote, Couric parroted the Democrat party talking point, that Bush had won "A majority, not a mandate."

And yet, Katie Couric refused to recognize his victory. And Democrats like to call other people angry and mean-spirited?!

Seems to me that what's mean-spirited is to tell a bald-faced lie about what someone else said. Katie Couric said that Bush had won a majority. That's not refusing to recognize his victory, that's confirming it. What she denied was that his victory was overwhelming, or whatever constitutes a mandate.

I can remember Presidents like Johnson, who won with about 60% or more of the popular vote (my memory is not exact), and Nixon, who won every state except Massachusetts. Those guys got mandates. President Bush got a 3% victory, and has majorities of 5% in one house and about 3% in the other. Those are majorities, but they're not what I'd call a mandate.

Surely it works well as a DNC talking point, but that doesn't mean it's wrong.

26 posted on 11/04/2004 9:47:16 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

LIBERAL DEFINITION OF POLARIZATION - Republicans (MAJORITY PARTY) who DO not Support Democrap (MINORITY PARTY) agenda are POLARIZING

If the situation is reversed as it was for 40 years, its called DEMOCRACY.


27 posted on 11/04/2004 9:48:40 AM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson