Skip to comments.
Archaeologists May Have Found What Was Once The Biggest City In Italy
The Economist ^
| 11-4-2004
Posted on 11/07/2004 5:27:22 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: Ptarmigan
bushushaski? Is that the langue from Chechnya/Ingushetia/Dagestan?
41
posted on
11/09/2004 10:42:08 PM PST
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: TheCrusader; VadeRetro
Alexander the Great decided to go around Rome and leave it alone on his conquest of the known world.
huh???? Alex didn't even head west to conquer the Illyrians -- he headed to conquer the civilised states in the East -- Persia in particular. The Persian Empire was ripe for picking -- remember the Persians practically came up with the notion of an Empire, with bureaucracies and administration in place. The Persian Shah was also very weak (just a decade earlier, Macedonian mercenaries had nearly helped a minor son take the throne, so they knew the country) and by just tipping it over, he got a developed Empire falling into his lap
Rome at that time had just been sacked by the Celts (well, around that time).
When Alex reached India, he nearly got routed by a very minor Indian King -- Purva. His soldiers heard of the mighty Magadhan Empire (based in the Gangetic plains) with its gigantic army and basically told Alex to shove it -- they wouldn't head any further east.
Incidently, Greek commanders got Indianized and many settled in northern India, or moved east -- in what is now Kashmir there are folks (hunzas?) who are supposed to be near pure Greeks), while in Bengal tales of demonic figures and the Devi goddess are supposed to be linked to tribals fighting against a force led by Northern Indians with Greek mercenaries.
42
posted on
11/09/2004 10:49:50 PM PST
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: TheCrusader
My personal opinion on why Alexander left the city-state Rome alone was that Rome had already gained a reputation as feirce fighters.
well, I don't think he considered them worthy of being conquered -- just as the Romans decided it was not worth going into Germania in the 1st century
43
posted on
11/09/2004 10:50:55 PM PST
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: TheCrusader
Remember that Rome was sacked by the Gauls at around that time and then slowly rebuilt herself to fight in the Punic wars -- the third Punic war was the catalyst that pushed Rome into superpower status and helped her in her fight against the Alexandrine kingdoms in Greece, Syria and Egypt
44
posted on
11/09/2004 10:52:34 PM PST
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: VadeRetro
Author Robin Lane Fox (The Search for Alexander) seems to think Nanda could have been overcome--it fell within a few years to the upstart Chandragupta--had Alexander not tried to cross the Punjab in the monsoon season.
Well, Chandragupta (the founder of the Mauryan Empire) did lead a gigantic army -- and his grandson Ashoka did rule over an Empire that incorporates most of what is now India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Burma (to some Extent) with vassalages in Central asia and the Tibetan plateau
45
posted on
11/09/2004 10:55:00 PM PST
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Cronos
I was simply reporting Fox, not particularly agreeing with him. That was a very chewed-up Macedonian force by the time it turned around. (And some of its worst traveling lay ahead.)
46
posted on
11/10/2004 7:08:49 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
(A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state. -MS)
To: Cronos
Maybe. That's anyone's guess? They tried to link with Basque and Ainu.
47
posted on
11/10/2004 6:04:53 PM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(Proud rabbit hater and killer)
To: blam
48
posted on
09/09/2006 9:15:31 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
49
posted on
07/28/2010 4:49:25 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: blam
50
posted on
07/28/2010 4:50:33 PM PDT
by
whence911
(Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
To: Ptarmigan
Some say Basque is related to Etruscan language.
Naah, they’re just basquing in their glory.
51
posted on
07/28/2010 4:56:24 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Ptarmigan; SunkenCiv; tet68; Cronos
52
posted on
07/28/2010 5:15:09 PM PDT
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson