Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voter fraud uncovered in New Mexico
Washington Times ^

Posted on 11/09/2004 11:29:18 AM PST by No Dems 2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last
To: No Dems 2004
Their disenfranchising ineligible voters!

-PJ

101 posted on 11/09/2004 12:33:24 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Damn. What is the deal with New Mexico?

Thank God the country wasn't waiting on NM to get its act together to find out who is president.

102 posted on 11/09/2004 12:34:47 PM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; No Dems 2004

Rebecca fixed us real good. State law requires that new voters show a picture ID. Now, anything with your name written on it qualifies. She even ran taxpayer funded commercials encouraging people to vote, and tellimg them what form of identification "qualifies". All you needed was a utility bill to "prove" you were elgible to vote. We were out in force all over the state. We did our best to keep the RATS from stealing this election from us.


103 posted on 11/09/2004 12:39:04 PM PST by wjcsux (DemocRATS, a group of whiners who refuse to face reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Maria S

WE did our duty in Dona Ana County. Rita Torres, the Dona Ana County clerk, really worked hard to keep us away.


104 posted on 11/09/2004 12:40:54 PM PST by wjcsux (DemocRATS, a group of whiners who refuse to face reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Looks like someone forgot to take notes at the

Bill Richardson "Ballot stuffing seminar 2004"


105 posted on 11/09/2004 12:44:44 PM PST by thingumbob (Now showing........W 2 ..........for 4 more years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapy

Hey hapy, I'm in Wethersfield (blue hell town in a blue hell state) and the registrar's list had a person who was registered to vote with my address, in addition to my wife and I. We've been in the house for 7 years and I know the family who lived there before us was there for at least 20 years. Occasionally we'll get junk mail with her name on it. All very strange.

Anyway, my wife contacted the town registrar's office and the women on the phone was very rude (probably crabby because of the way the election was panning out) and said the only way a person's name could be taken off the list was if they signed a letter stating that they had moved. Well if they don't live here now, unless they are hiding in a corner of our basement, how exactly can they sign such a letter?

After getting nowhere with the d-bag, my wife called the Secretary of State's office. As much and we can't stand Susan, the person on the phone was very helpful and said that the registrar should have caught it during previous elections when that person didn't show up to vote (they are supposed to follow-up with registered non-voters to confirm correct addresses) and that they would be in contact with the registrar.

Long story short, start with the SoS office and they will get you headed in the right direction.


106 posted on 11/09/2004 12:46:05 PM PST by LoneGOPinCT (From the Land of Liberalty. All we are saying is give pizza chants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fooman; Bob; greyfoxx39

ALL: I withdraw my comments regarding John Fund unconditionally. I was wrong & went off half-cocked on a guy that is really one of the best in the biz.

Here's my beef: We are getting what I see as half-stories out of Ohio, Florida, New Mexico, and other states. Some have substance many are total BS. The big deal in the WaTi story is the Secretary of State Rebecca Vigil-Giron. Not the 100 proven frauds so far.

Regarding the stats issue re: 6 sigma. We must remember two things here: 1) the total vote count is about 745k votes; 2) the provisionals are by default the most suspect of them all. I don't have stats on how many provisionals typically get tossed, but the % isn't small.

Regarding New Mexico politics and the corners (Farminton/Ship Rock): I would expect that if there is a big fat smoking dem gun anywhere in the state it would be there...not the SE part of the state (Dona Ana).

Looking back at the Elephant Butte scandal there's plenty of room for trouble in SE, I'm just saying corruption and systematic voter fraud have different characteristics.

But of course that is just my opinion.

dung.



107 posted on 11/09/2004 12:49:46 PM PST by Moose Dung (Soiling the Shoes of the Lunatic Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT

tuff to report a kerry fraud vote in a blue state.

Nice to meet you, I live in Canton


108 posted on 11/09/2004 12:50:49 PM PST by hapy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Moose Dung

In philly 100K welcome voter registration cards were mailed out by the gop ( why not the fed gov?) 10K came back as undeliverable. PEople were voting regular, then provisional. We are only seeing a tiny slice-- BOTH in % coverage and methods - which are numerous.


109 posted on 11/09/2004 1:01:57 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Bill Richardson learned from the very best...

VOTE FRAUD ENGINEERS
IN THE WORLD


THE MEXICANS


110 posted on 11/09/2004 1:03:32 PM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moose Dung
I don't have stats on how many provisionals typically get tossed, but the % isn't small.

Usually that is correct. However, in this case it's the other way around.
From greyfoxx39:

"In reading the Journal this morning, I see that 75% of the 13,000 provisionals in Bernalillo county and 66% of the 734 in Sandoval are being classified as valid."
(http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/profiles?location=79)

111 posted on 11/09/2004 1:06:56 PM PST by CedarDave (Remember November 2, 2004 -- May it always be known as Vietnam Veterans Victory Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
Bill Richardson learned from the very best... VOTE FRAUD ENGINEERS IN THE WORLD THE MEXICANS

I beg to differ....make that THE CLINTONS!

112 posted on 11/09/2004 1:07:01 PM PST by greyfoxx39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Egon

Well, one clue to the fraud might be that the Dem. Sec. of State is going to court to bar Republicans from looking over her shoulder while she counts. :-)


113 posted on 11/09/2004 1:07:34 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

disenfraudulising.....


114 posted on 11/09/2004 1:07:36 PM PST by grounhog ( grounhog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004

Provisional ballots were a great idea, and this is proof of it. People don't get turned away at the polls, but illegitimate votes aren't counted.


115 posted on 11/09/2004 1:08:54 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004

Current vote count as of the time of this posting, President Bush ahead by 8,282 votes.


116 posted on 11/09/2004 1:11:56 PM PST by CedarDave (Remember November 2, 2004 -- May it always be known as Vietnam Veterans Victory Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
For more than 70 years
the  PRI where in power.
Among some fraud: ballot stuffing, ballot theft,
busing, money for ballots, food for ballots, murder, etc.

117 posted on 11/09/2004 1:15:29 PM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

What was the count before, do you know?


118 posted on 11/09/2004 1:16:29 PM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
Observers watching the counting of New Mexico's 2004 provisional and absentee ballots have uncovered evidence of voter fraud

??????????????????????????

I am shocked! SHOCKED!!!!!!!!!!!

119 posted on 11/09/2004 1:17:28 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl (OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hushpad

Most of those provisional ballots should not count. Provisional ballots are used to prevent a possible vote from being counted until the status of the voter can be determined. If the voter wasn't on the rolls then they had to vote provisionally. The good thing about the provisional ballot as opposed to the challenged voter is that you can identify the ballot and pull it if the voter is not qualified to vote in the election.


120 posted on 11/09/2004 1:25:24 PM PST by texgal (end no-fault divorce laws return DUE PROCESS & EQUAL PROTECTION to ALL citizens))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson