Michael Peroutka's Acceptance Speech

Constitution Party Website ^ | 2003 | MICHAEL PEROUTKA

[Indie]

I may not agree with all of it, especially on his Pat Buchananesque isolationism!! and his being against the WOT... But there is much wisdom in what he has to say.

[ClintonBeGone]

More blather from the other clown party.

[The Hollywood Conservative]

The fact that he is releasing this just shows me he's a bigger loon than I thought he was.

[Dog Gone]

Ping me when they actually elect some candidates at the state level. What percentage of the national vote did they get?

[MJY1288]

I agree with your assessment of his speech, but the reason why he, and others like him, will never get more than 1% of the vote, is because of the radical reversal of where the liberals have taken this country. We have to take it back the same way we lost it, one step at a time.

His not supporting the WOT and his isolationism is simply idiotic and NOBODY with those views will ever get elected

[steplock]

So you do NOT believe in our Constitutional rights to be represented by the party of our choice?

Which communist dictatorship or monarchy do YOU belong to?

[Indie]

Please tell me which part is blather [besides the part about his isolationism which I disagree with]. Was it the part about the Constitution, immigration or God?

It was posted for the wealth of conservative issues he discusses quite well, not so the bots could call him a clown.

Typical FR BOT reply. If it isn't Bush, if Bush didn't say it, then it must be worthless....sheeszh.

[Tamzee]

Don't worry, Michael, you can have your minions back as soon as they're done creating a bloodfest among the Republican Senate majority.

[Indie]

P:ing to post 7

[StopDemocratsDotCom]

what a waste of bandwidth this thread is...

[El Conservador]

*YAWN*

[Zack Nguyen]

I respect the principles of the Constitution Party. But they are wasting their time if they ever want power to bring change in our political system. Our political does not, and never will, support three viable political parties equal in importance and policy-making power.

I'm not trying to be disrespectful here. I understand what drives people to make this decision. I've wondered about it a few times myself.

But I only have one life to live, and I want to spend it making a difference. That's why (for now) I hang my hat in the Republican Party.

Having said that, yes, Peroutka makes some excellent points. His stand on the WOT is very wrong. But he makes good points from time to time.

[Indie]

Such waste you bothered to take more bandwidth to reply to something you never even read except maybe the title.

See post 7 bot.

It's called the free exchange ideas, and he has a lot of damn good ones. And since FR is about discussing CONSERVATIVE issues, it is not waste of bandwidth.

[datura]

Beat me to it.

This "acceptance speech" is relevant to anything right now in our lives how?

Didn't we get enough of your agenda prior to the elections, Indie? I know I did.

[steplock]

Apparantly the Constitution Party, and the Libertarian party is making some people on here VERY afraid.

I wonder why? Can it be that these two parties are the only ones that want to return the United States back to the "Republic for which it stands"?

I voted for Bush this time to give us a breather from the leftists, the anarchists, the socialists, communists and from the most dangerous --- the kennedy, clinton, kerry MONARCHISTS that have been trying to get the USA back under the royal thumb --- remember "CAMELOT" the beginning of the brainwashing propaganda of the monarchists.

Think that is extreme? What does the "Esq." used by 90% of the lawyers really mean? Look up which country it denotes subjugation to!

[El Conservador]

Well, who do you plan to vote for in '08???

If you say "Peroutka", when Hillary™ may well be candidate for the Dems, you deserve to be bitch-slapped!!!

[ClintonBeGone]

So you do NOT believe in our Constitutional rights to be represented by the party of our choice?

steplock & indie, let me make this very clear - I believe in all our constitutional rights, including Indie's right to post this blather and Steplock's right to read it.

[foreverfree]

bump

[ClintonBeGone]

Apparantly the Constitution Party, and the Libertarian party is making some people on here VERY afraid.

If you substitute 'amused' with 'afraid' and you've got it right. Buncha clowns - all of 'em.

[Indie]

This "acceptance speech" is relevant to anything right now in our lives how? Didn't we get enough of your agenda prior to the elections, Indie? I know I did.

Hmm..I guess you can not read my comment in post 1. If you have to ask what the relevance of the post is, I can you're beyond help. It is the ideas, not the fact that it was acceptance speech.

So tell me...what part [besides his stupid view of the WOT] do you find so ridiculous?? What part of "MY" agenda as you so smartly put it do you find disagrees with your views??

Me thinks you are just angry that someone else DARED run against your idol.

I am very impressed that you hold me in such high esteem that my views against unlimited immigration and abortion made you sick. Are those the agenda you despise?

Certainly you can be more specific other than just saying I make you sick...LOL. Otherwise I suggest rather than call names, you post something more intelligent.