Posted on 11/14/2004 11:16:15 PM PST by kattracks
Being non judgmental doesn't make him a pedophile either. It might make him unethical ( which I would certainly agree with) and possibly amoral.
True. So give them condoms.
Hey. Kids are going to smoke anyway, so let's give them free cigs, too.
They "know" that tobacco use in movies influences kids but the sex, disrespect,and foul language are just a f****n' part of life and to not include them would be censorship and besides they don't drive the culture.
Welcome to wackyworld (to quote a 'truth' add).
The sex positive types are okay with adult minor sex, minor minor sex, unmarried sex, adulterous sex, human animal sex, related human sex, same sex encounters, group sex encounters, hey, it's just sex.
Rape is the only thing they oppose (on the grounds there is no consent, rape fantasies are okay and they don't like to acknowledge that there is an age when minors are TOO YOUNG TO GIVE CONSENT).
He certainly laid a foundation for others in institutional settings WHO DO ADVOCATE IT.
I don't believe in anything without some sort of hard evidence. Show me documents that support the notion that Kinsey actively engaged pedophiles to molest children.
Click this link and read what Dr. Judith Reisman has to say:
http://www.drjudithreisman.org/
If anyone promotes pedophilia, and knowingly supports pedophiles, and supports the concept of child abuse and molestation by pedophiles, he's as bad as anyone who actually performs the act.
Why don't you read some non-pro-Kinsey research and articles and quit supporting a debunked "researcher" who knowingly promoted all manner of sexual deviance as well as sex crimes against children?
Ok, first thing: Where on this thread did I say I was supporting Kinsey? In my first post I trashed Kinsey for being a bad scientist , thats not exactly a ringing endorsement of his work. I'm asking for HARD evidence to prove to me that he activley supported pedophiles.
Second, Reisman's web site was a informative (Thanks!).
Here is her link that attempts to link pedophilia and Kinsey...
http://www.drjudithreisman.org/kinseypedos.htm
She's relying on the Tripp interview to provide a smoking gun, but Tripp never actually saw Kinsey with any pedophiles. He speculates as to Kinsey's methodology based on what he knew about Kinsey and how he approached problems. After reading this, I had two thoughts. First - I wanted to take a shower because that read made me feel grimey. Second, Kinsey probably did have contact with some of them if Tripps speculation is correct. But at this point, the evidence is still Hearsay. No one saw anything. We don't know if Kinsey made up his research.
Tripp, on the other hand, took pictures of two boys sodomizing each other and later gave it to Kinsey. While thats technically not pedophilia, it is morally reprehensible.
Reisman has written two books about Kinsey (IIRC), and there are others as well. I haven't read them, although I probably should. I already have trouble sleeping sometimes. :-(
I just can't become completely informed about everything, although I should try harder.
It's kind of like reading more books to find out exactly how evil Hitler was.
It's already being used by pedophiles, along with changing the language, i.e. adult-child sex or intergenerational sex instead of child sexual abuse.
That line made me sit up and take notice. Exactly what is he advocating here?
Reisman writes that the film makers located another Kinsey accomplice in Berlin, Dr. Fritz Von Balluseck, the notorious Nazi pedophile who contributed his child abuse data during the twenty year period of 1936 to 1956 to Kinsey's research data base....
Apparently, Von Balluseck was sending details of his experiences to Kinsey on a regular basis. Letters from Kinsey to Von Ballusek encouraging the Nazi to continue his "research" were found and reviewed by the presiding judge, Dr. Henrich Berger. Berger repeatedly expressed his outrage at Kinsey for not turning Von Ballusek in to the authorities....
The German newspaper, the National Zeitung wrote on May 15, 1957: "Today the court has got four diaries and in these diaries with cynicism and passion, he (Von Balluseck) recorded his crimes against 100 children in the smallest detail. He sent the detail of his experiences regularly to the U.S. sex researcher, Kinsey. The latter was very interested and kept up a regular and lively correspondence with Von Ballusek."
IL MEDIA UNSPUN: Kinsey & Ebert, At the Movies
"People of informed conscience are exposing this film and its subject for what they are. Roger Ebert doesn't like that. . . Read more...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.