Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/15/2004 1:05:33 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: neverdem
"The New York Times without Bill Safire is all but unimaginable,"

And unreadable.

2 posted on 11/15/2004 1:06:44 PM PST by JennysCool (1969'ers telling us how to run our government are like 1929'ers telling us how to land on the moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

They'll replace him with a similar "conservative," a la Tucker Carlson.


3 posted on 11/15/2004 1:07:49 PM PST by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The NY Times just lost its only conservative columnist.

4 posted on 11/15/2004 1:07:55 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Further slippery slide into the abyss of liberal left's communistic demoncRAT drive.


6 posted on 11/15/2004 1:09:09 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Safire to Step Down as Times Columnist
  Posted by neverdem
On News/Activism 11/15/2004 1:05:31 PM PST · 1 reply


THE NEW YORK TIMES ^ | November 15, 2004 | By THE NEW YORK TIMES
William Safire, whose political commentary column has appeared on the Op-Ed Page of The New York Times for more than 30 years, is stepping down, The Times said today. The newspaper said in a statement that Mr. Safire would make his final appearance as an Op-Ed columnist on Jan. 24, 2005. "The New York Times without Bill Safire is all but unimaginable," Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the publisher of The Times, said in the statement. "Bill's provocative and insightful commentary has held our readers captive since he first graced our Op-Ed Page in 1973. Reaching for his column became a critical...
 

The New York Times to Run Final Op-Ed Column by William Safire on January 24, 2005 (replacement?)
  Posted by Cableguy
On News/Activism 11/15/2004 9:56:07 AM PST · 27 replies · 722+ views


Business Wire ^ | 11/15/04
William Safire will publish his final column as a New York Times Op-Ed columnist on January 24, 2005. Arthur Sulzberger Jr, publisher of The New York Times, said, "The New York Times without Bill Safire is all but unimaginable. Bill's provocative and insightful commentary has held our readers captive since he first graced our Op-Ed Page in 1973. Reaching for his column became a critical and enjoyable part of the day for our readers across the country and around the world. Whether you agreed with him or not was never the point. His writing is delightful, informed and engaging. So,...
 

WILLIAM SAFIRE LEAVING NYT; RETIRES COLUMN... DEVELOPING... (ANOTHER DRUDGE ONE LINER!)
  Posted by areafiftyone
On News/Activism 11/15/2004 9:01:48 AM PST · 24 replies · 930+ views


DRUDGE ^ | 11/15/04
William Safire leaving NYT: retires column.... Developing.... (No Story Yet)
 

William Safire Leaving NY Times
  Posted by Rutles4Ever
On News/Activism 11/15/2004 9:00:43 AM PST · 28 replies · 978+ views


Drudge Report ^ | 11/15/2004 | Matt Drudge
WILLIAM SAFIRE LEAVING NYT; RETIRES COLUMN... DEVELOPING...

7 posted on 11/15/2004 1:09:18 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

So the NYTimes is rid of the sole non-leftist on it's opinion pages. Safire is now relegated to writing on the "English Language". How nice..... [/sarcasim]


8 posted on 11/15/2004 1:09:22 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Surely, to leave the Times one must step UP!


14 posted on 11/15/2004 1:14:51 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sigh,there goes a voice of reason. Take care Bill and thank you.!!


15 posted on 11/15/2004 1:15:01 PM PST by Cutterjohnmhb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

He was one of the very few reasons to read the NY Times at all.


18 posted on 11/15/2004 1:20:15 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

A rare intelligent voice at the Slimes is out.


19 posted on 11/15/2004 1:23:30 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The New York Times without Bill Safire is all but unimaginable," Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the publisher of The Times, said in the statement.

Then may I suggest closing up shop at the NYT? We'll learn to live without ya.
20 posted on 11/15/2004 1:27:34 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
William Safire's career proved above all else that all you need in order to have "civil" discourse with liberals is to be, yourself, a liberal. While he may have been conservative by NYT standards, he was, after all, a "Nixon-Republican." In other words, he was a liberal by word and deed.
21 posted on 11/15/2004 1:28:52 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Ann Coulter would be a good replacement....


22 posted on 11/15/2004 1:29:03 PM PST by Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Safire considered himself the moderate among the
Nixon speech writers. Buchanan was the conservative,
and I don't remember who the leftie was. But the
moderate in a moderate administration? Safire stood
out only because he worked on the times.


24 posted on 11/15/2004 1:35:08 PM PST by RWCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I wish they got rid of Nicholas Kristof, Fox Butterfield(He might be gone), Paul Krugman, and Dowdy instead.


25 posted on 11/15/2004 1:36:28 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("No time for losers, cause we are the champions...of the world!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I don't blame him. With a flagship like the NY Times, it's a bit downgrading to be with the likes of Rather at CBS.

He has a refutation to protect.


26 posted on 11/15/2004 1:38:19 PM PST by El Oviedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Well this will open up a spot from James Carville, much better fit for the NY Times then Safire.


28 posted on 11/15/2004 1:42:37 PM PST by jpsb (MAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Whether you agreed with him or not was never the point," Mr. Sulzberger said. "His writing is delightful, informed and engaging."

I don't think Pinchy bothers to read his own newspaper.

29 posted on 11/15/2004 1:46:32 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Replace him with Ann Coulter


34 posted on 11/15/2004 2:30:23 PM PST by Dan Walsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Safire was strongly pro-abortion. He wrote an occasional good column, like the one in which he called hillary a congenital liar. But they were few and far between. Maybe about one a year in the last decade or so.

David Brooks is reliably pro-abortion and pro-homosexual too. He's the New York Times's idea of a conservative. Compare either of these guys to the token conservatives at the Boston Globe or the Washington Post, and they look pretty poor.


35 posted on 11/15/2004 2:45:57 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson