Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Principals freaked out by students' dance, dress
Chicago Tribune ^ | 27 Nov 2004 | Dahleen Glanton

Posted on 11/27/2004 6:33:04 AM PST by ActiveDutyUSMC

Principals freaked out by students' dance, dress

By Dahleen Glanton Tribune national correspondent

Gaoda McFadden still wonders what all the fuss is about. The way the 16-year-old sees it, the principal verreacted by ending his school's homecoming party early because kids were dancing, well, the way kids dance. Like many of his friends at Stephenson High School, McFadden sees nothing wrong with bumping and grinding on the dance floor or being sandwiched between two girls with their hips gyrating against him. After all, he said, you can turn on MTV or Black Entertainment Television and see it all day.

"It wasn't at all like what they tried to say. It was juicy," said McFadden, a junior who was present last month when Principal Morcease Beasley abruptly ended the party because of what he called "disgraceful dancing." In teenager talk, "juicy" means exciting. In an era when sexy music videos and scantily clad pop stars set the standard for many young people, parents and educators across the country are waging what appears to be an uphill battle over values. Discord over lewd dancing and dress is hardly new, but the goalposts for indecency have shifted radically in recent times. School officials find themselves trying to ban students from sporting gold teeth like rappers and from "freaking," or dancing in ways that explicitly imitate sex. It is a moral challenge in suburban and rural areas where values, as suggested by the 2004 presidential election, have become one of the top issues among millions of Americans.

While each generation pushes the limits, some parents feel that pop culture, fueled by the Internet, Hollywood and cable television, has prodded teenagers further across the line of decency than ever imagined in the 1950s when some wanted to ban Elvis Presley. These days, some schools are banning certain kinds of dance moves--or canceling dances altogether. Educators are setting strict dress codes as early as elementary school, forbidding girls from wearing skin-bearing outfits such as low-rider jeans, thong underwear and midriff tops and banning attire for boys such as oversized T-shirts and pants that sag, often exposing their backside.

Sandra McGary-Ervin, principal of Sandtown Middle School in Atlanta, said such hip-hop attire, for example, is not only distracting to learning but is potentially dangerous. "If we were in a crisis and the children had to get out of the building, they couldn't get out quick enough because their pants would trip them up," McGary-Ervin said.

About half of all teenagers between 15 and 19 are sexually active, according to a survey by the National Centers for Disease Control, though statistics show a decline in teenage pregnancy in recent years. Still, parents and educators are alarmed by the sexual content in pop culture and its influence on young people. Fifties parallels

Some, however, say modern critics of teen dancing and attire are the equivalent of those in the 1950s who wanted to stop Elvis from shaking his hips. Charles Haynes disagrees. The senior scholar at the First Amendment Center, an Arlington, Va.-based center that works to protect 1st Amendment freedoms, said: "This is a lot different than the '50s. There are now dances with a lot of body contact in ways that imitate sexual practice. Some schools are teaching abstinence, and if they are trying to send the message that sexual activity is something to be taken seriously and that there are emotional and medical implications for young people who engage in it, then they must do something." Some schools are teaching courses in "character education," Haynes added, and to teach teenagers "about moral issues and character issues in a very powerful way. It is a movement in education that is spreading across the country." Like many principals, McGary-Ervin has a dress code at her school. Each morning, she stands at the school's entrance and monitors what the students are wearing: If boys don't have a belt on, she gives them one. If a girl's skirt doesn't reach her fingertips when she extends her arms down her legs, she has to go home and change. Continual violations lead to more serious consequences, including expulsion.

Several districts have banned "Britney Spears-like" clothing and require students to cover their stomachs and backs and not show their underwear. Others, like Chicago, have no districtwide dress code, but allow individual schools to set standards. Chicago Public Schools spokesman Mike Vaughn said there is a broad range, from schools that require uniforms to those that have no rules.

Some officials have tried more drastic measures. A Louisiana legislator unsuccessfully this year tried to get a bill passed as part of the state's obscenity law that would have made it illegal for anyone, not just young people, to wear below-the-waist pants. School officials in Merrillville, Ind., near Chicago banned pink clothing and accessories for middle and high school students, fearing that gangs had adopted the color. Though there was no evidence of gang activity in the district, officials said they had noticed many students wearing pink, so they issued the ban as a precaution. In Augusta, Ga., high school students cannot wear large belts, sagging pants or removable gold or platinum bridges that cover their front teeth--a style popular with rappers.

"We have things such as gangs that spill over into the school, so we have to deal with it," said Richmond County Schools spokeswoman Mechelle Jordan. Getting youngsters to follow rules prepares them for the workforce, too, she added.

One of the biggest challenges school officials have dealt with in recent years is the sexually explicit dancing known as "freaking," where groups of teens pack together on the floor and simulate sexual moves. Problems have surfaced in numerous cities, including Anchorage, Ft. Wayne, Ind., Palo Alto, Calif., and Norristown, Pa. The school district in Oceanside, Calif., near San Diego, won't allow songs that have obscene or sexually demeaning lyrics to be played at school functions.

Some principals have eliminated school dances. In some schools, chaperones walk around with flashlights to make sure the dancing does not go too far. Still, when the dance has ended and the lights come on, some principals say, they have found condoms and underwear on the floor. A committee of parents, teachers and students at Stephenson High School in Stone Mountain, an affluent town on the outskirts of Atlanta, are devising a policy on the kind of dances that can be done and music that can be played at school events. The group, which also will define what students can wear to prom or homecoming dances, was formed after principal Beasley said he had tried for three years to get students to conform. "The student dancing is immoral and reflective of much that is wrong within our society and the base values that are often communicated through our media and that significantly contribute to many of our society's problems," Beasley, who also is a minister, said in an e-mail to parents.

Murray Forman, a professor of communication studies at Northeastern University in Boston, said young people are affected because they are exposed to sexual images continually through the media. He said it is wrong to blame hip-hop music, as some do, for problems that should be addressed at home.

"Hip-hop is part of a media matrix. . . . It is part of the culture and young people are very attentive to it," said Forman, who co-edited a collection of hip-hop articles, titled "That's the Joint! The Hip Hop Studies Reader." He said young people are doing more than "consuming the images," adding: "They are not just replicating what they see in the media, they are making it and reinterpreting it wherever they live."

Students fight back Though the Supreme Court has sided with schools over issues of dress codes involving children under 18, some students are protesting. In Purcellville, Va., students at Loudoun Valley High School circulated a petition claiming that the board's decision to ban dancing violated their 1st Amendment right of free speech. In some cities, students have held alternative parties to protest a dance ban at their high schools.

But the homecoming dance was the first party Zecheiah Martin, 16, attended at Stephenson, and she was surprised at what she saw. "We were around adults and we should carry ourselves better," said Martin, a 10th-grader. "I didn't know people danced like that at homecoming. It looked like people were having sex."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: babylon; bet; culturewars; dancing; gomorrah; mtv; pimpsandhos; sodom; teens; values
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2004 6:33:05 AM PST by ActiveDutyUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC
After all, he said, you can turn on MTV or Black Entertainment Television and see it all day.

Yes you can.

2 posted on 11/27/2004 6:37:06 AM PST by bankwalker (Katie's legs are the reason God created the mute button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC
students claiming that the board's decision to ban dancing violated their 1st Amendment right of free speech.

Not on our dime. Go out and get a job and then you can rut in public.

3 posted on 11/27/2004 6:38:05 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

And that is why you shouldn't let your kids watch it. :)


4 posted on 11/27/2004 6:38:40 AM PST by najida (Friends may come and go, but enemies accumulate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC

It's time to pull the plug. If kids want to watch that stuff on TV they need to earn the money to pay for it, and NOT from their allowance. We didn't have a TV as we raised our children. Sure, they watched some at other's houses, but they usually found other friends who also didn't watch that much TV and they were a lot healthier. We still don't have a TV, so I know nothing of sit-coms, etc. Maybe I'm missing some good shows, and maybe not.


5 posted on 11/27/2004 6:40:41 AM PST by Shery (S. H. in APOland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: najida
And that is why you shouldn't let your kids watch it. :)

That is why I had cable turned off in my house when my kids were young, and now they are fine adults.

6 posted on 11/27/2004 6:41:33 AM PST by bankwalker (Katie's legs are the reason God created the mute button.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Next they will be following the homosexuals lead and claim this is a "rights" issue. LOL


7 posted on 11/27/2004 6:42:13 AM PST by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
"Not on our dime"

Isn't it their dime...and their parents dime and a lot of other folks dime who might not object?

There was a time with Elvis swayed his hips and some thought the world would end.

In ten years some of these kids will be parents and then they will be objecting to something their kids are doing...funny stuff
8 posted on 11/27/2004 6:43:38 AM PST by The Louiswu (I am a - 40-something White, Republican and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: najida
And that is why you shouldn't let your kids watch it. :)

I saw this argument made yesterday with regard to violent video games.

Funny how we allow the manufacture and distribution of pornography, violent material, etc, then suggest that it is up to the parents to control their use.

With that argument, why don't we allow the mfg and distribution of heroin, pot, meth, etc and just limit the use to parental control???

Hint: We know that parents can not control their kids... just can't be done.
9 posted on 11/27/2004 6:50:06 AM PST by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC
Some schools are teaching abstinence, and if they are trying to send the message that sexual activity is something to be taken seriously and that there are emotional and medical implications for young people who engage in it, then they must do something."

Hey, no need to reinvent the wheel. The burqa and the veil already exist.

10 posted on 11/27/2004 6:50:09 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu
There was a time with Elvis swayed his hips and some thought the world would end.

Careful, you are about to expose the fallacy in your own argument!

At the time, those who said Elvis was bringing down society talked about something called a slippery slope...

Now, 45 years later, we see that in fact there was a slippery slope and we have come a looooong way, baby!

The real question, Where are we going??!?!?!?
11 posted on 11/27/2004 6:52:59 AM PST by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC

Simple solution to all the inappropriate dress issues: All schools should go to uniforms.

End of argument about what to wear.


12 posted on 11/27/2004 6:53:39 AM PST by Restorer (Europe is heavily armed, but only with envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Agreed, not totally, but you DO have control of what happens under your roof and in the family unit.

I teach dance....and I can tell in a heartbeat the girls who watch MTV/BET and those who just watch other kids move.

The difference is in one group doesn't 'get it' when I call certain moves 'stripper moves' and the other group says 'Yeah! That is what it looks like to me too!'. h


13 posted on 11/27/2004 6:54:11 AM PST by najida (Friends may come and go, but enemies accumulate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC

"forbidding girls from wearing skin-bearing outfits "

Odd. Why are they trying to ban leather clothing?


14 posted on 11/27/2004 6:54:33 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC
After all, he said, you can turn on MTV or Black Entertainment Television and see it all day.

But the insipid crap you see on TV has no influence on your social behavior. Just ask Jack Valenti.

15 posted on 11/27/2004 6:58:07 AM PST by IronJack (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC
After all, he said, you can turn on MTV or Black Entertainment Television and see it all day.

Oh, well then, what are we worried about? If it's on TV it must be OK. Why didn't you say so sooner?

16 posted on 11/27/2004 6:58:59 AM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Brown shirts? Or would all in basic black be better?


17 posted on 11/27/2004 6:59:47 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Al Anbar -- not just another bad neighborhood, it's a state of mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
#11..Good post.

There's always a slippery slope....whether dirty dancing, abortion, sex ed in schools, gay rights....

..Ideas start out innocuous (by design) and later the true agenda is exposed.

I'm dating myself, but at my school dances, our principal said "no octopus hold", LOL, and we knew exactly what that meant.

We respected his opinion, we knew the boundaries and there was order & decorum.

18 posted on 11/27/2004 7:01:05 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

700 club is on TV, too. Don't see many kids emulating Benny Hinn, do we?

It may not matter that it is on TV as much as it is forbidden and caused parent to get upset.

I found a fix to that. I am the wild one in the family. The kids revolt against that by wearing short hair, attending class, doing their homework and staying involved with clean 'square' activites. Meanwhile I'm smoking stogies and booty dancing 'til dawn. I know, it's tough, but I love my kids that much.


19 posted on 11/27/2004 7:04:20 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Al Anbar -- not just another bad neighborhood, it's a state of mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ActiveDutyUSMC
The 60's generation saw a need for change and sparked the fire that brought it about, albeit, sometimes disgracefully. Like it or not, they saw a "personal responsibility" to bring about change, and they did it.

This current generation SEES what is wrong, and refuses to do anything about it. They have no understanding of our rights and the Constitution, yet they constantly pop off about it...
20 posted on 11/27/2004 7:12:27 AM PST by baltodog (Feel free to believe that you descended from monkeys. I'm not gonna' stop you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson