Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert: Massive WMD attack 'inevitable'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, November 30, 2004

Posted on 11/30/2004 1:01:46 AM PST by JohnHuang2

The United States is losing the war on terrorism and faces an "inevitable" al-Qaida attack with weapons of mass destruction that will be worse than 9-11, according to a counter-terror expert.

"All of the warnings we have today indicate that a major strike – something more horrible than anything we've seen before – is all but inevitable," said Yossef Bodansky, former director of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, in an interview yesterday with the Jerusalem Post.

Bodansky said "the primary option" for the next al-Qaida attack on American soil would be to employ weapons of mass destruction.

"I do not have a crystal ball, but this is what all the available evidence tells us; e will have a bang," Bodansky told the Post, adding al-Qaida is "tying up the knots" for an attack.

Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America," and "The Secret History of the Iraq War," said the jihadist movement is gaining strength as Osama bin Laden's call to arms draws an increasing number of recruits throughout the Muslim world.

Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Bodansky said, the number of people trained and willing to die has more than doubled to an estimated 500,000 to 750,000. Intelligences estimates say another 10 million are willing toactively support them while another 50 million would provide financial support.

Bodansky was in Israel for the second annual Jerusalem Summit, an international gathering of conservative thinkers, the Post said.

Al-Qaida has not carried out a second major attack, Bodansky explained, because the first one sufficiently sent the message to the Islamic world that the U.S. could be penetrated, and a second attack necessarily would have to be more grandiose.

Now, however, the re-election of President Bush has set the stage for a massive attack with non-conventional weapons, Bodansky believes.

There has been a debate between bin Laden allies and some Islamic leaders over the propriety of such a large-scale attack on U.S. citizens, he told the Jerusalem paper. But, according to bin Laden's mindset, that has been resolved by the American electorate backing Bush and thus "choosing" to be enemies of Islam.

Though some debate and doubt may linger, the planning for an attack is finished, Bodansky believes.

"They got the kosher stamp from the Islamic world to use nuclear weapons," he said.

Bin Laden's theme has shifted since 9-11, Bodanksy said. Previously, perpetual confrontation and jihad against the U.S. was seen as the only way to protect Islam. Now, the emphasis is on punishing American society.

"Just as the West was challenging the quintessence of Islam by means of the globalization era, there was a parallel need by Islamic extremists to strike at – and hurt – the core of American society, this time with weapons of mass destruction," Bodansky said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedanukes; bodansky; jihadinamerica; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Allegra

If, the attack is as serious, as they say it will be, you can bet our crop of Muslims in this country will be thinned out considerably. Like all but, eliminated. At the very least, it will be confined to internment camps.

If, I were Muslim, I would be very afraid for my existence in America. The Religion of Peace will prove to be the Religion of Deception & Lies.


21 posted on 11/30/2004 2:43:18 AM PST by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Howlin; Timesink; Utah Girl; hosepipe; backhoe; FITZ; Happy2BMe; ...

NUKE MECCA !


22 posted on 11/30/2004 2:44:05 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (Lord, place the steel of the Holy Spirit in my spine and the love of the Holy Ghost in my heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Previously, perpetual confrontation and jihad against the U.S. was seen as the only way to protect Islam. Now, the emphasis is on punishing American society."
Baloney!

Protecting Islam and punishing American society are one and the same in the warped minds of the Al-Qaida Satanists. If they could have destroyed America, they would have done so already.

"Al-Qaida has not carried out a second major attack, Bodansky explained, because the first one sufficiently sent the message to the blah blah blah blah..."
Al-Qaida has not carried out a second major attack BECAUSE THEY CAN'T--and the reason is the expert leadership of President Bush, the genius of the American people, and the blessings God has showered upon America!
"Now, however, the re-election of President Bush has set the stage for a massive attack with non-conventional weapons, Bodansky believes."
Bodansky's nuts.

The re-election of President Bush has assured continued vigilance and preparedness.

Note Bodansky's implicit plea for appeasement. Note also the tagline.

"Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Bodansky said, the number of people trained and willing to die has more than doubled to an estimated 500,000 to 750,000. Intelligences estimates say another 10 million are willing toactively support them while another 50 million would provide financial support."
They underestimate the American people.

They're also placing their trust in Satan and not God.

23 posted on 11/30/2004 3:13:39 AM PST by Savage Beast (This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

I agree...President Bush should speak to the nation over this threat and warn anyone stupid enough to use nuclear weapons against us....If they want to keep their precious Islamic holy sites from being nuclear dust piles, they should think twice.....


24 posted on 11/30/2004 3:17:00 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trailboss800
Very true. We have proved time and time again if you attack us our response will be swift and unmerciful. Does Japan and 9/11 ring a bell. They would need to wait for another president like Clinton to be at all successful.
25 posted on 11/30/2004 3:27:43 AM PST by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: auggy
If, the attack is as serious, as they say it will be, you can bet our crop of Muslims in this country will be thinned out considerably. Like all but, eliminated. At the very least, it will be confined to internment camps.

That's pretty drastic seeing as how there has been no such attack and this warning comes from one "terrorsim expert."

26 posted on 11/30/2004 3:39:19 AM PST by Allegra (Hark! What's that? Why, it's a light at the end of a long and interesting tunnel....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
The time to launch a WMD attack would have been 3 years ago, not today.

Or the next time a Democrat occupies the White House.

27 posted on 11/30/2004 4:11:11 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Hitler declared war on the US first in compliance with their treaty with Japan and the US reciprocated in kind.


28 posted on 11/30/2004 5:04:52 AM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
Or the next time a Democrat

deconstructs the intelligence community for political purposes

29 posted on 11/30/2004 5:15:44 AM PST by alrea (Help wanted: Dir. of Homeland Security, State of New Jersey. Must be willing performer, & Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Just a guess. Is this guy trying to sell a book?


30 posted on 11/30/2004 5:18:58 AM PST by airborne (God bless and keep our fallen heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

"If something like this did happen, I wonder what would be the Military response of the United States?"

Dancing in the streets would result in weapons raining from the sky.


31 posted on 11/30/2004 5:20:45 AM PST by BillyCrockett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

The fact is, if the enemy Could really launch a strike, they would do so without talking about it or giving a pre-attack warning.
I don't recall Bin Laden sending out any tapes with threats prior to 9/11.

Silence from them is what would worry me more.


32 posted on 11/30/2004 5:30:12 AM PST by FearlessRightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Thanks for the ping!


33 posted on 11/30/2004 6:34:03 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Why do you think they grow slimmer?

The borders are still unsecured. We still are being told that open borders are the way to go.

I'll tell you the way to go. Seal off the borders with military patrols and give them shoot on site orders for illegals coming into the country.

This will be a good first step, and then we'll be alot safer.


34 posted on 11/30/2004 8:42:10 AM PST by ChildofReagan (Deus Vult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: foobeca

FDR didn't declare war on Germany, they declared war on us.


35 posted on 11/30/2004 8:43:01 AM PST by ChildofReagan (Deus Vult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: auggy

I think there needs to be camps set up right now and the Islamic hoards processed out of this country.


36 posted on 11/30/2004 8:45:12 AM PST by ChildofReagan (Deus Vult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
If something like this did happen, I wonder what would be the Military response of the United States?


Boom!

37 posted on 11/30/2004 10:16:11 AM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society (James Burnham--Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Of course it's inevitable. Eventually a Democrat will get elected to office sooner or later.


38 posted on 11/30/2004 10:18:04 AM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
If something like this did happen, I wonder what would be the Military response of the United States?

We would do nothing, and that in the end is the sad truth, however, we cannot nuke a city for what a handful of people do. Flame on ...
39 posted on 11/30/2004 10:21:44 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
"That's pretty drastic seeing as how there has been no such attack and this warning comes from one "terrorsim expert."

Nuclear bomb in a large city is pretty drastic, too, wouldn't you say?

I have heard this alot lately. I'm sure more than one terrorism expert has stated this. Even, if it is just one, that is what I feel, if this should happen.

I also think you could kiss the, "Politically Correct" crap goodbye. That would be good.

40 posted on 11/30/2004 10:27:47 AM PST by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson