Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pornography Is Anything But A Victimless Crime
Concerned Women For America ^ | Dec. 8, 2004 | Cheri Pierson Yecke

Posted on 12/09/2004 1:16:14 PM PST by Lindykim

Pornography is Anything But a 'Victimless Crime'     12/8/2004 By Cheri Pierson Yecke How many more expert studies do we need to convince ourselves of this fact?

Jud Fry -- one of the characters in the Rodgers and Hammerstein musical Oklahoma! lives in a shack that is papered with pornographic images. He is a loner, lacks social skills, and is feared by his neighbors. He is clearly capable of murder. This insight into the character of a porn addict hit the Broadway stage in 1943.

Fast forward to 2004. A sexual assault and several attempted abductions of girls in the St. Paul, Minnesota, area are allegedly the work of 19-year-old Ryan Mely, who has been charged (for starters) with second-degree criminal sexual conduct. He apparently was a loner who was feared by his neighbors. Jud Fry is a fictitious character who bought his porn from an itinerant peddler. How did Ryan Mely get his start? Apparently, pornography was a family pastime. While some dads bond with their kids by fishing or playing hockey together, it appears that Mely and his father (a convicted sex offender) shared an interest in pornography. It was reported that sexually explicit material was found at the family home and on their computer.

Is anyone really surprised that pornography is involved here? It has been 60 years since a Broadway musical portrayed what social scientists and criminal analysis have now found to be true -- addiction to pornography can lead to violent sexual behavior. Dr. Victor Cline, a clinical psychologist and expert on sexual addictions, has identified four stages of progression among his patients.

The first stage is addiction, where the attraction to porn is overpowering and the viewer keeps craving more. The next stage is an escalation to more shocking and deviant images, as the earlier ones have lost their power to stimulate. Third is desensitization, where anything earlier seen as disturbing and repulsive becomes viewed as commonplace. Finally, satisfaction cannot be reached unless the perpetrator begins acting out the activities witnessed in the pornography. In effect, fantasy must become reality.

The events in which Mely was allegedly involved appear to follow this pattern. Perhaps the same is true for Alfonso Rodriguez, the man who allegedly abducted and murdered Dru Sjodin. Rodriguez apparently had an infatuation with Dru, who worked at Victoria's Secret, an upscale lingerie shop. On several occasions he allegedly called the store where she worked, asking for her by name.

Victoria's Secret is well known for its racy, soft-porn "fashion show" where voluptuous young models strut the runways in revealing lingerie. The liberal National Organization for Women called it "exploitative" and the conservative Concerned Women for America condemned it as a "high-tech striptease." Regularly protested by both sides of the political spectrum, the company announced in April that it will no longer air this event

The last Victoria's Secret "fashion show" aired on network television November 19, 2003. Dru was abducted three days later. Could it be that Alfonso Rodriguez, a convicted sex offender, watched the show and was propelled into Dr. Cline's fourth stage of sexual deviance? This is a question his judge and jury may consider.

In an interview the night before his 1989 execution, serial killer Ted Bundy revealed the influence of pornography on his life.

A case study for Cline's four stages of addiction, Bundy started his descent into sexual deviance and murder with magazines he found in the neighbor's trash. His addiction escalated until he felt compelled to act out his desires in more than 30 murders that were accompanied with violent sexual acts.

He warned Americans: "There are those loose in [your] towns and communities, like me, whose dangerous impulses are being fueled, day in and day out, by violence in the media, in its various forms -- particularly sexualized violence ... . There are lots of other kids playing in the streets around the country today who are going to be dead tomorrow, and the next day, because other young people are reading and seeing the kinds of things that are available in the media today."

Abundant evidence has demonstrated the tragic impact of pornography. How many more expert studies do we need to convince ourselves of this fact? The elections of 2004 have sent politicians the message that morals matter, so now is the time to focus on the impact of pornography -- the so-called "victimless crime."

Cheri Pierson Yecke is a Distinguished Senior Fellow for Education and Social Policy at the Center of the American Experiment, a conservative think tank in Minneapolis. She is a former Minnesota commissioner of education and is author of The War Against Excellence. This article first appeared in the Minneapolis Star Tribune. Used with permission.  

Concerned Women for America 1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: (202) 488-7000 Fax: (202) 488-0806 E-mail: mail@cwfa.org    


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cwa; filth; garbage; morality; porn; puritanpatrol; talibornagain; thoughtpolice; vile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 641-651 next last
To: Chad Fairbanks
...the Founding Fathers probably would have had a few choice words for governmental enforcement of moral views.

That has to be the most over-used fallacy in political debate. "You can't legislate morality!" What hogwash! Legislation is the codified morality of the people! Why is killing illegal? Because the people have deemed that it is morally reprehensible. Why is theft illegal? Because the people find it morally wrong.

Even the idea that everything is OK if you don't harm somebody else is based on the moral foundation that harming someone else is wrong!

What people really mean is: I'm uncomfortable with that level of morality, so leave me out of it.

121 posted on 12/09/2004 2:08:38 PM PST by TChris (You keep using that word. I don't think it means what yHello, I'm a TAGLINE vir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

?!?


122 posted on 12/09/2004 2:08:46 PM PST by najida (Aunt to Miss Emily Ann- Cutest Baby in the World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII

......hmmmm, obviously you've never seen Tyra Banks pose in a VS catalog.

Tyra Banks = Voluptuous.


123 posted on 12/09/2004 2:08:48 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Melas
"Yes, attractive women are evil. Victoria's Secret is evil."

Interestingly enough, doesn't it seem like Iran would be a perfect place for some of these folks to live? You certainly don't have to worry about pornography there, what with the benevolent Mullahs ensuring that anything 'stimulating' is strictly controlled.
124 posted on 12/09/2004 2:08:56 PM PST by NJ_gent (Conservatism begins at home. Security begins at the border. Please, someone, secure our borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Innisfree
The production of pornographic imagery does not constitute a "private activity between consenting adults."

Sure it does: the porn is made in private and it is made by consenting adults. Everyone involved in the making of the porn is there willingly.

Just because a group of people are involved does not make an activity "public." After all, Augusta is a private club, even though it has hundreds of members.

125 posted on 12/09/2004 2:09:12 PM PST by Modernman (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Not feathers,
chickens silly (and don't tell Lazamataz)>:>


126 posted on 12/09/2004 2:09:23 PM PST by najida (Aunt to Miss Emily Ann- Cutest Baby in the World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith

I had a similar addiction to yours.

If you wish to sustain that addiction, avoid marriage.


127 posted on 12/09/2004 2:09:38 PM PST by RinaseaofDs (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
We expect our women to be big-busted, flat-tummied, firm-assed, clean-shaven, bisexual, stilleto and fishnet wearing nymphettes

Well, I don't want the bi-sexuality part, but the rest sounds fine to me....

128 posted on 12/09/2004 2:10:34 PM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Melas

You make me snide.

I advanced my "real" argument--porn is destructive--how many ways do you have to hear it?? Which of the multitudes of studies that proves it would you like to denigrate next??

Hard for for a fan of porn like you to hear that though....you chose a nonsensical, deliberately simplified response.

You are way off.


129 posted on 12/09/2004 2:10:41 PM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
And it is such a vile picture now--I shudder that my young sons will one day see the depiction of females on the web in such tortuous, mindnumbing and grotesque scenarios--and yes, I've seen it, I've made a point to.

Its sooo evil that you had to check it out, eh?

130 posted on 12/09/2004 2:11:08 PM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: najida
IOW, a man hooked on porn will often be extremely disappointed in most, if not all of the RL females he encounters/marrys. And will usually take it out on her for being at fault (difficult, demanding, slow, imperfect), and then return to porn for satisfaction with the 'perfect, no fuss, no effort' woman.

I've heard that repeated time and time again but never a shred of evidence. As someone who's viewed porn, and someone who's had real sex, let me be the first to state for the record that there is no comparison at all.

131 posted on 12/09/2004 2:11:09 PM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
And it is such a vile picture now--I shudder that my young sons will one day see the depiction of females on the web in such tortuous, mindnumbing and grotesque scenarios--and yes, I've seen it, I've made a point to.

Well, then that means you've looked at porn far more than I have.

Got anymore stones you'd like to throw, hypocrite?

132 posted on 12/09/2004 2:11:22 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks ('Hate' is just a special kind of Love we give to people who suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: All

Saying that viewing porn causes people to commit sex crimes is akin to saying owning a gun causes people to commit gun crimes.

If you want to ban something, start with the violent images that Hollywood bombards us with in movies and TV

Banning Pornography would be choosing between the worst of two evils.


133 posted on 12/09/2004 2:12:29 PM PST by Rodney Dangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt
TOuche. I wonder if I can collect SSDI for this as well....

I'm a healthy straight white male. I belong to the only non-victim group in America. I feel left out of victim culture.

134 posted on 12/09/2004 2:12:34 PM PST by Modernman (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

When it's photographed or videotaped, sold, and then mass-distributed, there's nothing "private" about it.


135 posted on 12/09/2004 2:12:47 PM PST by Innisfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: TChris
"No, we are to conclude that, like any other studies, some are fatally flawed and others less so. We don't throw out all the studies as irrelevant because some contradict others, we root out those that are bogus and keep nailing down the truth."

Calling psychology 'science' is optional as it is. Case studies are downright pseudo-science. So, essentially, we're looking to 'nail down the truth' using a pseudo-scientific analysis of semi-scientific research. That's sort of like rounding an estimate - the answer just becomes increasingly inaccurate and imprecise as you add levels of abstraction to reach it.
136 posted on 12/09/2004 2:13:29 PM PST by NJ_gent (Conservatism begins at home. Security begins at the border. Please, someone, secure our borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: valuesvaluesvalues

According to the Bible and the God of the Universe everyone is supposed to choose one person and look at them only. It is a sin and you break one of God's Ten commandments by desiring someones else's wife or soon to be wife. It is not only adultery being committed by looking at another woman but stealing from the man who does or will have her. It has consequences and will be punished. Regardless of whether a society has laws or not about this, God does and He will hold us accountable according to what He has told us in His Word, whether we believe it or not.


137 posted on 12/09/2004 2:13:56 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim
Given the increase in pornography over the last decade [via internet, cable TV & dvds] you'd expect sex crimes would be increasing.

Sexual Assaults Down by Half Over Last Decade

Overall Decline from 1993 through 2002:

Rape down by 60% (from 1.0 per 1000 persons age 12 and older to 0.4 per 1000)

Attempted rape down by 57.1% (from 0.7 per 1000 to 0.3 per 1000)

Sexual assault down by 62.5% (from 0.8 per 1000 to 0.3 per 1000)

-- Sexual Assaults Down by Half Over Last Decade

There is a correlation (not necessarily causality) between porn and a lower rate of sex crimes.

138 posted on 12/09/2004 2:13:58 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
If anything, high taxes and the liberal welfare state are responsible for low birth rates.

That's a good part of it, but it's also the attitude of modern Japanese.

139 posted on 12/09/2004 2:14:11 PM PST by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt

Damn straight.

I have two young sons. Their lives, happiness and solid development mean everything to me.

Eyes are open here, pal.

You porn lovers would really rather we did not expose your dark world, eh?


140 posted on 12/09/2004 2:14:15 PM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 641-651 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson