Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Humvees No Match for Crude Bombs ( Report from the Humvee graveyard ~ Armor helps some )
Los Angeles Times ^ | December 11, 2004 | Bruce Wallace, Times Staff Writer

Posted on 12/11/2004 10:14:03 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

FORWARD OPERATING BASE KALSU, Iraq — This is a graveyard for Humvees, the final resting place for the hulking vehicles felled by insurgents' roadside bombs.

In a parking lot, the U.S. military's most common personnel carriers lie flattened with noses down in the mud. Their metal carcasses are barely recognizable. Tires have been splayed to the sides or blown away entirely. Shrapnel has burst holes in unprotected parts of the vehicles, as if they were tinfoil.


The nine mangled Humvees here have been destroyed by what the military calls improvised explosive devices, or IEDs.

"Now this one here, you can see the IED tore the whole back end off the vehicle. It's just gone," said Sgt. Patrick Parchment of the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit, which operates south of Baghdad.

"The front is sitting cock-eyed. And that's steel," he said, showing a visitor another severed vehicle.

The blasted remains do not inspire optimism about the fate of the Marines who had been riding in them. Sixteen Marines of the 24th have died since arriving here in July; 259 have been wounded. The majority of the casualties were caused by IEDs, as Marines must daily brave a gantlet of roadside bombs on highways and dirt roads that cut through farms.

The Marines and Army have almost 20,000 Humvees in Iraq, according to the Pentagon. But a quarter of the vehicles do not have proper armor.

The problem came into focus this week when a Tennessee National Guardsman told Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that troops had to forage for scrap metal to weld to their vehicles for protection. The confrontation, at a U.S. base in Kuwait, triggered an uproar and raised questions about whether the Pentagon was doing enough to provide safety equipment ..........

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armor; armorflap; humvees; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2004 10:14:03 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Wallace was recently on assignment with the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit in Iraq.


2 posted on 12/11/2004 10:15:06 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Many of the IED's are 155mm artillery shells. They will not be able to uparmor the HumVee enough to withstand a direct hit or very close explosion of that size without it no longer being a HumVee.

Just my opinion.

3 posted on 12/11/2004 10:21:24 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; TexKat
I don't think that is very well understood....we need a picture ....that helps nonmilitary types (I am one ) to understand.....

The media is playing a game with this armorflap...ie.. if your son is in an armored Humvee then he is safe.

I think they (the media ) have sold that thought pretty well, even here on FreeRepublic....

4 posted on 12/11/2004 10:27:14 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Your professional (EOD) opinion on my comment in post 3, and any info as response to post 4 would be great!


5 posted on 12/11/2004 10:29:53 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; John Jorsett; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; blam; TexKat
Here is some media bias:

The Marines and Army have almost 20,000 Humvees in Iraq, according to the Pentagon. But a quarter of the vehicles do not have proper armor.

What is proper armor for a vehicle that was designed as a replacement of a WW II light vehicle?

6 posted on 12/11/2004 10:30:18 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Oh highly valued and esteemed, truth-saying Mister Professional JOURNALIST (not Reporter)....

.....there is nothing "Crude" about a 155mm artillery shell.

Just try making one yourself....then we'll talk.

Hello...Hello.....?!!!

Figured.


7 posted on 12/11/2004 10:32:45 AM PST by PoorMuttly ("The right of the People to be Muttly shall not be infringed,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
The point is well made if you are talking about the journalists writing the article.

The 155mm shells being used are not crude. That was my whole point in post #3. They are sophisticated weapons, particularly when they are fashioned as Phase II IED's with more than one explosive deviced wire to the 155mm shell.

The entire point is that I believe you are not going to uparmor HummVees to withstand a direct 155mm hit.

8 posted on 12/11/2004 10:42:19 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"Now this one here, you can see the IED tore the whole back end off the vehicle. It's just gone"

Great I asked my son where he sits and he said in the back! Unfortunately they don't even stay in the Humvees but often go out on foot patrol. I pray a lot.


9 posted on 12/11/2004 10:44:51 AM PST by heylady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I am not sure even a Bradley could take a direct 155. Even some Abrams have been disabled by them. That is one heck of a whallop.


10 posted on 12/11/2004 10:45:29 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (I was born six gun in my hand, by the gun I'll make my final stand. NSDQ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

it's not possible for every piece of rolling stock to be a tank, is it?


11 posted on 12/11/2004 10:47:35 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Exactly. Up armoring helps when the detonation is far enough away to protect from shrapnel and reduced blast. But is the 155mm explodes close enough...a Hummer is going to be hosed IMHO.


12 posted on 12/11/2004 10:48:29 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: heylady; Jeff Head
To make a point here.....

So you feel that there should be a properly armored vehicle of some type for our soldiers ( and your son) to ride in that would protect them from these ?crude improvised bombs

and but for Rumsfeld ...who did not anticipate properly that these weapons would be used.....????

13 posted on 12/11/2004 10:50:43 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
it's not possible for every piece of rolling stock to be a tank, is it?

You and I know that and many here on FR know that,....but the Media is playing a GAME with this and doing well doing so....

Many people seem to thing it is possible.....the Media , very slyly is telling them it is....

14 posted on 12/11/2004 10:53:17 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Jeff Head

Your correct Jeff the armored Hummers are not gonna keep ya whole if the IED is bigger that a grenade ie a low velocity projo. Albeit it will keep ya alive if your 50 meters spaced from the hummer the large arty IED targeted.

When the vehicles bunch up the command detonated IED is very effective . Lots of posts recently on the false sense of security the armored hummer gives that is replacing age old tactical SOP for MOUT .

Stay safe


15 posted on 12/11/2004 10:54:30 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The problem isn't armor.
The problem isn't the HumVees. Which were never meant to be armored, anyway.

The problem is the wong vehicle!

Ship all of those M-113 Armored Personnel Carriers (That were thought to be obsolete and outdated during Vietnam, yet used in Desert Storm and Enduring Freedom) BACK to Iraq!

To take over riding herd on convoys!

Jack.


16 posted on 12/11/2004 10:57:43 AM PST by Jack Deth (When In Doubt.... Empty The Magazine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Deth

We need a picture....


17 posted on 12/11/2004 10:59:34 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

As noted above, many of the so-called IEDs are 155 mm (US/NATO) or 152 mm (Soviet/Russian) artillery shells and are only "improvised" because they are being used in a manner for which they were not intended, that is, to be fired out of the barrel of an artillery piece. The most vulnerable point on any vehicle - tanks included - is the belly. Detonate a 155 mm HE (high-explosive round) under an M113 (an armored - but not much - personnel carrier) and it is going to be destroyed. Combat - whether "low" or "high intensity" - is dangerous, even in armored vehicles. It is much more so dismounted (on foot) in an urban environment; such is the nature of so-called Fourth Generation Warfare.


18 posted on 12/11/2004 11:00:07 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No you missed the point completely. My son started in an Abrams. When they downsized ,a lighter military, they put him in a Bradley. Well you can't patrol the streets of Baghdad in a Bradley so he went into a Humvee. He is a soldier. His job is extremely dangerous. I am not of the mindset that the government must be responsible for protecting us under any and all circumstances. My son is a good soldier, two bronze Stars, and he doesn't pi** and moan about everything. What exactly was your point?


19 posted on 12/11/2004 11:05:03 AM PST by heylady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
very slyly is telling them it

no, a fox is sly. these people rely on brute force.

A lie is believed because of the unconditional and insolent inflexibility with which it is propogated.

-- Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf

20 posted on 12/11/2004 11:07:03 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson