Posted on 12/12/2004 6:31:17 PM PST by Coleus
Fri Dec 10, 8:09 PM ET
|
By MARY PEREA, Associated Press Writer
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - The U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) sided Friday with a New Mexico church that wants to use hallucinogenic tea as part of its Christmas services, despite government objections that the tea is illegal and potentially dangerous.
The high court lifted a temporary stay issued last week against using the hoasca tea while it decides whether the Brazil-based O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal is permitted to make it a permanent part of its services.
The legal battle began after federal agents seized 30 gallons of the tea in a 1999 raid on the Santa Fe home of the church's U.S. president, Jeffrey Bronfman.
Bronfman sued the government for the right to use the tea and the church won a preliminary injunction, which was upheld by 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) in Denver. The Bush administration then took the case to the Supreme Court.
"They're delighted," attorney Nancy Hollander said of the church members she represented. "They're so thrilled that they can celebrate Christmas for the first time since 1998."
Bronfman and attorneys for the government did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
The church, which has about 140 members in the United States and 8,000 worldwide, said the herbal brew is a central sacrament in its religious practice, which is a blend of Christian beliefs and traditions rooted in the Amazon basin.
Hollander said the tea is drunk in a ritual similar to the Catholic Communion. Church members then sit in a circle and meditate; they believe the tea brings them closer to God.
The tea is brewed from plants found in the Amazon River Basin and contains DMT, which officials say is a controlled substance under an international treaty.
However, Bronfman's complaint contends the tea is "non-addictive, is not harmful to human health and poses none of the risks commonly found with the use of certain controlled substances."
The church had drawn parallels to federal protection for members of the Native American Church using peyote, which also has hallucinogenic properties.
They do not take kindly to thrill seeking white people.
Dave's not here.
Needs more Wild Turkey...
It's called Ayahuasca and it's in these days. No. I haven't taken it. I just read Sting's autobiography and starts off with him and his wife in Brazil taking Ayahuasca.
Ayahuasca.com is a library and community collectively researching the botany, ethnography, mythology, arts, music, therapeutic mechanisms, and phenomenology of the Amazonian Spirit Vine.
Ayahuasca (aya-soul/dead, wasca-vine/rope) or Yage (ya-hey) are native Amazonian names for the jungle vine Banisteriopsis Caapi, and the medicinal tea prepared from it.
The Banisteriopsis vine is a Malpighiaceous jungle liana found in the tropical regions of Peru, Bolivia, Panama, Brazil, the Orinoco of Venezuela and the Pacific Coast of Colombia/Ecuador. The vine constitutes the common base ingredient of the Ayahuasca tea which is used widely used throughout indigenous Amazonia to enable access to the visionary or mythological world that provides revelation, healing, and ontological security (Dobkin De rios 1972, Grof 1994, Andritsky 1984).
To learn more about Ayahuasca, read the 'Spirit Vine' FAQ, visit the forums, and browse the various sections of the site via the menubar to the left.
I know of a teacher who taught her students to get high by mixing mullin weed and sugar then smoking it!
It really is used for religious purposes and there really is a history going way back. >>>
It doesn't make it right.
Coleus, what makes it wrong?
BTW, did you pick your screen name knowing it was a hallucinogenic plant?
Is it? I never smoked it.
I think any drug use which alters the mind is wrong.
Well, I can respect your opinion.
There are many religions, including Christianity, that use mind-altering substances as part of their sacrament, though, and I see these South Americans as doing just that.
I just can't understand why someone needs to be "high" in order to pray for God. Most of us do fine without anything. Some actually fast before going to church.
Alcohol alters the mind, so do antidepressents.
I never tried hosaca and don't need to. These people, if I understand correctly, feel that God gave them the plants and God helps them communicate with Him through using the plants. If I had grown up in that culture, I probably would accept it as I now accept transmogrification and Communion wine.
These guys are not party animals; their use of the stuff is in a limited, specific, narrow way that I don't think crosses the line into "getting high" or "abuse". They use it as a sacrament and an adjunct to understanding trancendant issues. I can't see making them change their established religious practices to stay out of jail and keep their property (or be forced to leave the USA, because God showed them a particular way to worship).
We probably won't see eye to eye on this, Coleus, but that's OK, it's a big world (and thank God for Free Republic, where we can discuss stuff like this).
Must be what Dr. Dean was in to during the campaign.
You should bother to inform yourself about this one a bit more.
My limited grasp of Spanish and Portuguese makes that name lool likd "Center of the Beneficent Spirit (something) of grass". Sounds like it's a group of pot-heads.
Very interesting article, thank you for digging it out.
It does not say that hosaca induces schizophrenia, though; it does say that they find DMT in the urine of people who drink DMT beverages, and that they find it in schizophrenic urine also. You'd expect to find DMT in the urine of a hosaca drinker, he drank DMT. They are researching a theory that schizophrenia is caused by the brain demethylating an existing brain chemical into DMT, hence their interest in hosaca and ayahuasca. They looked for other chemicals in the hosaca drinker's urine, and either looked or planned to look for the same stuff in the schizophrenic's urine. It was surprising to see a reduction in serotonin levels, I would have expected an increase in serotonin when ingesting beta carbolines and substituted tryptamines.
The article mentions the transient nature of the experience- "rapid onset and brief duration", whereas schizophrenia as mentioned is persistent.
The psycomimetetic theory of hallucinogens like DMT has been dropped from most research, mostly because the hallucinogens' effect does not mimic psychosis, nor does the intoxicated state resemble schizophrenia. This research was performed before 1968, mostly; it is illegal to research it in the USA, which is probably why the work was performed in Argentina.
www.maps.org is a good source for current research.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.