Posted on 12/16/2004 9:23:29 AM PST by FBD
I'm not, as long as you pay for it.
Yeah, we'll pay for a wall, if your ilk will pay for the crimes committed by illegals...and the social services hat they are provided.
I don't have a ping list, sorry. here's a link to add to your list:
(desert visions) check out their new film clip: "Port of Entry"
http://www.desertvisions.us/entry.html
Tonk,
Can you ping your list? Thanks! -- E
bttt
Old news - Posted a month ago -
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1276205/posts
"....plan the invasion and takeover of Mexico."
LOL -
The worst thing that would happen is that we would win - then it would be OUR problem ...
Do you believe there is any remote chance that those bureaucrats really do not understand the problem? I don't know which is worse, incompetency or corruption. Either way, the most of us are in deep trouble.
How about a boycott also for big biz that contributes to outfits, like MALDEF who is trying to get rid of Ariz. prop 200 and killed 187 in California....companies such as McDonalds, WalMart, FannieMae, AARP, etc? I'm contacting them all to let them know why my family will not patronize them.
According to the Time Mag report, enforcement of employers hiring illegals has gone down 90% since 1990. These are the big political contributors, it's a scratch mine and I'll scratch yours deal.
Yes, we still have to have everyone fill out an I-9....if the government keeps us busy enough they think we won't notice.
Illegalize illegals: Time for showdown in open frontier
HoustonChronicle.com ^ | Dec 15, 2004 | William F. Buckley Jr.
Posted on 12/16/2004 1:17:16 PM PST by atomic_dog
Illegalize illegals: Time for showdown in open frontier
By WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY JR.
The new intelligence law, courtesy of 9/11, is mystifying because it does not face directly what is the most prominent threat to homeland security. It is: inimical action by non-Americans. All the people who participated in 9/11 were foreigners, here under various auspices. And yet the bill that has evolved from the findings of the 9/11 commission reads like an elocutionary exercise by a national committee to avoid saying anything unpleasant about unpleasant people born abroad.
Specifically, the threat at this moment is from foreign terrorism. The day may come when there are native-born Americans who join in such a threat, such as the Weather Underground types we experienced during the '60s.
But at this point, the terrorists come from abroad. "Last May," writes National Interest editor John O'Sullivan, "illegal aliens from Malaysia, Pakistan, Morocco, Uganda and India were released without bond. They are now at large in the U.S."
What happened is that as the intelligence bill crystallized, a fear developed that it might be construed as xenophobic. Somewhere along the line the word came down from the White House that for the president to be able to sign the bill, it had to be plucked clean of any suggestion that an illegal Muslim fundamentalist should be treated at all differently from an illegal Christian evangelist. Remember the odd deportment of Norman Mineta, who has been reappointed as transportation secretary? He went to extraordinary lengths several years ago to insist that security personnel at airports should pay no greater attention to 30-year-old Near-Eastern Muslims called Mohammed than they would to Shirley Temple.
Snip.....http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1302935/posts
I just checked out their website... It is shocking that major corporations are contributing to this political activist group. Not only are they fighting for driver's licenses for illegals, against implementation of Prop 200, "racial profiling" in terrorism security, and for illegal alien amnesty, but also against the gay marriage amendment.
Top contributors (from 2003 annual report)
Platinum Partners: (100,000+)
Anheuser Busch
Ford Foundation
James Irvine Foundation
Rockefeller Foundation
Sandler Foundation
Soros Foundation
Washington Mutual
So George Soros, Anheuser Busch, and Washington Mutual. Interesting crowd.
Soros says it all.
Yep. Very interesting crowd. Many of the same people we conservatives have been blaming for supporting the Dems all these years. They won't get a cent of my money. The kids aren't real happy, the list has every fast food place on it!
BTW, many who love the OBL have an interest, generally stock in those companies.
You should post a boycott alert on the front page, maybe along with a news article of MALDEF's latest exploits (fighting Prop 200, fighting enforcement of city ordinances in Redondo Beach, CA.)
Sponsors ranked by contribution on page 14:
http://www.maldef.org/publications/pdf/2002-2003_Annual_Report.pdf
I would pick the top two or three corporate contributors (WaMu, etc.) It's harder to target a boycott against hundreds of firms.
Front page here? Good idea, why don't you do it and I'll help you.
I've got only a short time before going to work. Thanks.
thanks for that good info, you two.
I'd go for a boycott, but it's getting hard to find places to shop, what with just about every major corp. contributing to this.
Regards
I know it's been posted, but a lot of FR folks didn't see it.
Plus, it's relevant with the incoming new cabinet. I'd like to see some changes, and the only way to do that, is to keep it on the front burner.
regards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.