Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worst Natural Disaster Ever?
The Disaster Center ^ | 12/29/04 | Me

Posted on 12/29/2004 1:48:49 PM PST by paudio

As sad as it is, the SE Asia earthquake is not the worst natural disaster ever. In 1991, Bangladesh suffered from Typhoon that killed about 140,000 people. Before that, in 1970, the country also lost 300,000 people from natural disaster.

The SE Asia disaster, however, seems to be a significant one because there are many Westerners, including 'celebrities', died in this unfortunate event.

Please look at the website that list of the worst 100 natural disaster in the 20th century. They also include famine and epidemic, though.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: aceh; andamans; bangladesh; burma; deaths; destruction; diegogarcia; earhquake; india; indonesia; malaysia; maldives; massdeath; nicobar; seychelles; somalia; srilanka; sumatra; sumatraquake; tanzania; thailand; tsunami; waves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Ready4Freddy
"...when the Three Gorges Dam collapses..."

What? You don't think dried mud can hold back 600 feet of water? China invented everything good, including large dam engineering and pasta.
41 posted on 12/29/2004 2:28:17 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Why a "celebrity" would want to visit a part of the world where basic services are haphazzard at best, and at worst are backwards and unsanitary is absolutely beyond me.


42 posted on 12/29/2004 2:28:30 PM PST by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Helmut Kohl was there. He was airlifted out on Sunday or Monday.


43 posted on 12/29/2004 2:30:26 PM PST by Jaded (Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: paudio

The flooding of the Huang He river in China in August of 1931 killed 3,700,000.


44 posted on 12/29/2004 2:34:37 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1
"a part of the world where basic services are haphazard at best, and at worst are backwards and unsanitary

You have obviously not been to these places. While conditions can be quite primitive inland in smaller, isolated villages, the conditions at these resorts and ocean front places is quite nice, even luxurious in most instances. Very much like Mexico where resorts are fully modern and cater to tourists.

45 posted on 12/29/2004 2:35:57 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

What is it with China and floods over the years, they havent figured that crap out yet?


46 posted on 12/29/2004 2:38:07 PM PST by Delbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
What's tragic is the fact that those already suffering, many of whom are truly innocent, i.e. kids, will suffer greater privation due largely to policies of "adults" running the affected / afflicted countries. Sri Lanka has never-ending civil war, Indonesia is overrun w/ Muslim extremists . . . all facts the MSM will paper over in their haste to chastise US.
47 posted on 12/29/2004 2:38:14 PM PST by NCCarrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: paudio
The SE Asia disaster, however, seems to be a significant one because there are many Westerners, including 'celebrities', died in this unfortunate event.

How could you say that? I'm not even aware of any celebrities that died. As far as I'm concerned the numbers are staggering regardless of who comprises the number. I wouldn't be surprised to see the number deade go much higher. This is a huge tragedy, no matter how many people died in the flu epidemic of 1918.

48 posted on 12/29/2004 2:38:18 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCCarrs

Yes the suffering will not be eased without strong oversight by the US and others. Keep the UN away!


49 posted on 12/29/2004 2:40:11 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Pray for the millions of lives disrupted by tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

I'm afraid the toll will touch 200k from the event and aftermath.


50 posted on 12/29/2004 2:43:13 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Pray for the millions of lives disrupted by tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown

Dude, I'm getting eyestrain from trying to read that chart.


51 posted on 12/29/2004 3:01:30 PM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Asfarastheeastisfromthewest...
You said: "All breathing creatures on the face of the earth were destroyed except for a single male/female pair of every species plus Noah, his wife, their three sons and their three wives."

Not entirely true. While indeed Noah was commanded by God to bring into the ark by twos, he was also admonished:

"Of every clean beast though shalt take to thee by the sevens, the male and his female: and of the beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.

Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and his female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth." Gen 7:2,3 (emphasis in italics mine).

In Genesis 6 what is stressed is the pairing of animals that were brought into the ark. However, in Gen 7 it is clear that a number of pairs of certain species was preserved.

What is important to observe here is:

1. God's care for man, for his comfort and benefit. We do not find that Noah was solicitous of himself about this matter; but God consults our happiness more than we do ourselves. Though God saw that the old world was very provoking, and foresaw that the new one would be little better, yet he would preserve the brute creatures for man's use. Doth God take care for oxen? (1 Cor 9:9). Or was it not rather for man's sake that this care was taken?

2. Even the unclean beasts, which were least valuable and profitable, were preserved alive in the ark; for God's tender mercies are over all his works, and not over those only that are of most eminence and use.

3. Yet more of the clean were preserved than of the unclean.

(1.) Because the clean were most for the service of man; and therefore, in favour to him, more of them were preserved and are still propagated. Thanks be to God, there are not herds of lions as there are of oxen, nor flocks of tigers as there are of sheep.

(2.) Because the clean were for sacrifice to God; and therefore, in honour to him, more of them were preserved, three couple for breed, and the odd seventh for sacrifice, (Ge 8:20). God gives us six for one in earthly things, as in the distribution of the days of the week, that in spiritual things we should be all for Him. What is devoted to God's honour, and used in his service, is particularly blessed and increased.

52 posted on 12/29/2004 3:01:32 PM PST by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Worst natural disaster - Death. Total fatalities from death - billions.


53 posted on 12/29/2004 3:07:32 PM PST by Blowtorch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

does anyone ever wonder why most natural disasters occur in Asia.........???????.......


54 posted on 12/29/2004 3:17:59 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Worst disaster that any one alive can remember.....


55 posted on 12/29/2004 3:19:01 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Don't forget the millions who died of flu after WWI.


56 posted on 12/29/2004 3:29:46 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Asfarastheeastisfromthewest...

There never was a global flood. The Noah story interpreted that way is just not true.


57 posted on 12/29/2004 3:32:02 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy

Or how about the Glen Canyon Dam.


58 posted on 12/29/2004 4:38:48 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: paudio

The Flood.


59 posted on 12/29/2004 4:40:41 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (Leftists Are Losers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

20th century only? What about the Permian Extinction?


60 posted on 12/29/2004 4:44:01 PM PST by Redcloak ("FOUR MORE BEERS! FOUR MORE BEERS! FOUR MORE BEERS!" -Teresa Heinz Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson