Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Animal rights group's McWin
The Australian ^ | 1/01/05 (in Australia) | AFP

Posted on 12/31/2004 6:38:50 AM PST by The Teen Conservative

Animal rights group's McWin
AFP
January 01, 2005

CHICAGO: McDonald's is considering forcing its chicken suppliers to use a new, more humane slaughter method following a proposal by an animal rights group that holds McDonald's shares.

The company is doing a feasibility study into requiring suppliers to switch to controlled-atmosphere killing (CAK), a technique championed by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

"This is a study we've been working on for a while," McDonald's director of social responsibility Bob Langert said. "It's a fairly new method ... there is some use of it in Europe, but not yet in North America, so we want to know more about it." The company revealed it was examining CAK after PETA submitted a shareholder proposal for a study on whether to make the method mandatory for McDonald's suppliers.

PETA, which buys stock in companies as part of its strategy, holds 199 shares in McDonald's. The group has had some success with McDonald's, persuading the company to improve slaughter conditions for cows and pigs and stop using egg suppliers that starve chickens for two weeks to shock the birds' bodies into another laying cycle.

"McDonald's eliminated some major abuses three years ago, but it must not turn a blind eye to the horrific abuse of chickens at slaughter," PETA spokesman Bruce Friedrich said.

"Currently, almost all chickens are hung upside-down with their legs snapped into metal shackles, which often breaks their bones," the group said in a statement.

"Many are still fully conscious when their throats are slit and when they are immersed in scalding-hot water for feather removal."

With CAK, the chickens' oxygen is slowly replaced with argon or nitrogen, putting the birds to sleep quickly and painlessly, he said.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: animalrights; animalwhackos; chickens; cults; ethicaltreatment; mcdonalds; peta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: The Teen Conservative
PETA...What a misguided dysfunctional group. Who gave them any authority over what humans consume, or the human food chain. I'm going to eat chicken and meat, and wear leather jackets.
41 posted on 12/31/2004 9:49:27 AM PST by Smartass (BUSH & CHENEY to 2008 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter

"100,000+ dead in a tsunami and these guys are worried about chickens?"

Oh no, I assure you these damnable freaky rat-bastards are CELEBRATING the deaths of the tsunami victims since dead people use less resources, create less greenhouse gases, and etc.

PETA is a Communist front organization - a branch of the Green Party, which itself diverged from the CPUSA in 1947/1948.

Best thing you can do with these people (where legal, of course) is shoot them dead as they commit their crimes of burglary, theft, arson, and other acts of terrorism.

They don't care about animals, it's just a front for imposing global Communism on free people.

Death to them all.


42 posted on 12/31/2004 10:30:05 AM PST by PeterFinn (Liberals are a greater threat to the USA than are Islamofascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

they have the proverbial chicken beak under the tent...


43 posted on 12/31/2004 10:30:30 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

"Don't kid yourself. PETA's agenda is forced veganism on the population brought about by increasing the price of meat to the point that is is no longer affordable."

You nailed it. Good on you.


44 posted on 12/31/2004 10:33:26 AM PST by PeterFinn (Liberals are a greater threat to the USA than are Islamofascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Good post - you're right. They hypocrisy is overwhelming. I'm sure they're all wearing leather shoes, and carrying briefcases and handbags made from animal skin.


45 posted on 12/31/2004 11:19:42 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
Thinking in Pictures

A very interesting book.

46 posted on 12/31/2004 11:22:12 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Honestly, I dont have much of a problem with this, I mean, if you are going to slaughter animals, why not do it as humanely as possible?

Well you must not be conservative enough. Or obviously you are a vegetarian wussy.

< /typical FR reply>

47 posted on 12/31/2004 11:23:25 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
How much is this going to cost the public?

Wow. The same attitude of those who want to keep allowing illegals into this country to work on farms.

48 posted on 12/31/2004 11:26:27 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

I'm sorry you missed my point. I didn't make my self clear. The cost of what ever gas they use is what I was referring to. I don't want illegals in the country either.


49 posted on 12/31/2004 11:44:11 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister

Yes but illegal lovers give the same whine line about having to pay more for produce without the illegals. We see countless threads about how the economy is getting better, so it's not as though people should be hurting over paying a bit more for produce and other foods, right?


50 posted on 12/31/2004 11:46:21 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

I'll pay more for produce handled by legal citizens and won't have a problem with that. I don't want to pay more for a McD's chicken sandwich because they are gassing the chickens when they can be dispatched with a hatchet for less.


51 posted on 12/31/2004 12:03:19 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

Oops.....dispatched by a legal citizen for less!


52 posted on 12/31/2004 12:03:53 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Teen Conservative

Well, if we're going to eat 'em, we might as well be nice to 'em....


53 posted on 12/31/2004 12:06:07 PM PST by Yossarian (Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Teen Conservative
McDonald's is considering forcing its chicken suppliers to use a new, more humane slaughter method...

They'll kiss the chickens to death.

54 posted on 12/31/2004 12:07:30 PM PST by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Teen Conservative

Der Final Solution for McChickens?

55 posted on 12/31/2004 12:17:01 PM PST by N. Theknow (Kwanzaa is to the holiday season what Michael Jackson is to child care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mindspy
If there is a painless method to kill animals that provide our substinance by the giving of their life, why are so many here opposed to that. Do you prefer to eat the flesh of an animal that died in pain?

See my post #20 and the posts of a few others. Don't you see, you are just not a tough guy like them. To them, any sensitivity for any reason shows weakness, I suppose.

56 posted on 12/31/2004 1:30:19 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
100,000+ dead in a tsunami and these guys are worried about chickens?

126,000+ unborn babies are murdered every day and all these Leftist do-gooders care about are chickens. I hardly expect them to get excited about the 100,000+ dead in the tsunami region.

Hell, Leftists get more bent out of shape over a boiled lobster than they do about the people butchered under Saddam's regime...

57 posted on 12/31/2004 2:24:41 PM PST by Prime Choice (Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ...And no, my powers can only be used for Good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Any pro-life person should have some compassion toward animals. Just looking at your own dog, it is pretty obvious it can feel joy -- and pain. As an owner of two exotic birds, I can tell you they aren't stupid, that they interact with humans in advanced ways, and have been demonstrated to have the learning power of 2-year olds.

Jeremy Bentham, a classic philospher, even promoted humane treatment of animals, and felt they should have limited rights. The issue has been debated for centuries, it is not a "PETA" invention.

A civilized person, I think, should have a consistent position on the issue of respecting life, and that should include being "pro-life" and having an interest in humane treatment of animals, even if you are not willing to go all the way to adopting a vegetarian diet (as I've done).

Yeah, I'm an NRA member -- but I don't recreationally hunt, though that's your legal right.

To gleefully discuss ending animals lives in a cruel and extremely painful way as I've occasionally seen on FR threads is pretty sick and juvenile.

I think Conservatives are better than that.

OK, that's my two cents.


58 posted on 12/31/2004 2:54:58 PM PST by 4Liberty (wages & revenue are Price Signals-- and some people [unions, subsidized cos] can't accept criticism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
They are chickens!!! Who gives a flip!

agree. ..Like what are the chickens going to say, "Cluck, Cluck.."

59 posted on 12/31/2004 8:10:41 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
See, therein lies the problem though, and how the illegal alien thing is connected. Somewhere along the way, we deciced we are entitledto cheap food. I grew up in a middle class family and we didn't have meat every night for dinner. Hell, we didn't have but twice or so a week, and if it was more often, it was a very small portion! My grandparents and great grandparents who came over from Italy and Poland didn't have meat all that often - it was a luxury.

So when and how did we determine that meat, and cheap meat but good cuts, was a right and should be cheap enough to have every dinner (and plenty of it)?

This is how it is connected to the illegal alien thing: Americans have also decided they have the right to cheap produce. Strawberries in January, lettuce in November, etc., all for as little as it would be in June.

We seem to have a weird sense of entitlement going on in this country.

60 posted on 01/03/2005 8:42:37 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson