Skip to comments.
5 new F/A-22 Raptors land at base
miami.com ^
Posted on 01/08/2005 5:48:14 PM PST by iso
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE -- (AP) -- Five more F/A-22 Raptors landed Friday at this Florida Panhandle base where Gen. John P. Jumper, Air Force chief of staff, is among the first pilots being trained to fly the new stealth fighter.
The five Raptors arrived from the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. plant in Marietta, Ga., a day after all F/A-22s were cleared to resume flying for the first time since a Dec. 20 crash at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev.
The additional planes increased the number of Raptors at Tyndall to 18, more than half of the 33 now in the Air Force inventory. A 34th plane had been scheduled to arrive but its flight was postponed due to mechanical problems, said Capt. Susan A. Romano, a Tyndall spokeswoman.
Jumper is scheduled to make his final F/A-22 qualification flight here Wednesday.
The planes were grounded as a precaution after the Nellis crash. Safety and accident investigation boards have not disclosed a cause, but Air Force officials said they were confident the jets could be flown safely based on preliminary findings. The pilot suffered scrapes but was otherwise unharmed.
Eight F/A-22s are stationed at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., and seven at Nellis for testing and evaluation. All pilot training is done at Tyndall. Langley Air Force Base, Va., is expected to receive the first operational Raptors this year.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: clubbingbabyseals; fa22raptors; langleyafb; tyndallafb; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-182 next last
1
posted on
01/08/2005 5:48:14 PM PST
by
iso
To: iso
To: martin_fierro
Awesome. F-22 spellz doom for crappy Chinese aircraft *grin*
Any plane going up against that will get the ultimate ZOT!
To: iso
Air dominance for the next 30 years.
4
posted on
01/08/2005 5:51:32 PM PST
by
demlosers
To: iso
I'm glad the AP has all those numbers for the world in living detail. And of course, also good that they broke it down to what was being stationed and where.
I feel safe.
5
posted on
01/08/2005 5:52:36 PM PST
by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: iso
It's kinda funny. There are people here who believe that the F-22 Raptor isn't going to be a apart of our inventory. I wonder how many squadrons of Raptors we have to have before they concede that the F-22 is going to replace the F-15 as the world's top gun, premier fighter. Not just as a concept, but squadrons of them. Yee haw!
6
posted on
01/08/2005 5:53:46 PM PST
by
GBA
To: iso
5 new F/A-22 Raptors land at base What a relief. Can you imagine the s+++storm if somebody left them up in the air?
7
posted on
01/08/2005 5:54:19 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: iso
Why is a general being trained to fly this plane, besides ego gratification?
To: iso
Gee. All they needed to do now is report how the planes were stationed on the deck, and who maintains them, and where who maintains them lives.
To: iso
10
posted on
01/08/2005 5:56:24 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: martin_fierro

Labor of love! And what a labor it is. ;)
11
posted on
01/08/2005 5:56:55 PM PST
by
Raffus
(Thanks to all Veterans for their service to our Country.)
To: iso
12
posted on
01/08/2005 5:57:12 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: martin_fierro
The F-16 and the B-1 are still the sexiest planes in the air. The 22 looks like the bastard child of the British Tornado and the F-18.
13
posted on
01/08/2005 5:57:45 PM PST
by
zarf
To: iso
14
posted on
01/08/2005 5:58:08 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: connectthedots
"Why is a general being trained to fly this plane, besides ego gratification?"
Rank has it privileges.
If he like it, and I am sure he will, he will be an advocate for the plane.
To: blogbat
I'm glad the AP has all those numbers for the world in living detail. And of course, also good that they broke it down to what was being stationed and where.The government doesn't make a secret of procurements or deployments like that. WTF do you expect an F-22 to protect you from anyway?
To: zarf
The F-16 and the B-1 are still the sexiest planes in the air. My vote would be the P-38. But I don't believe there are any "in the air" anymore...
17
posted on
01/08/2005 6:02:05 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: nuconvert
18
posted on
01/08/2005 6:02:27 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
19
posted on
01/08/2005 6:03:48 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: F14 Pilot
20
posted on
01/08/2005 6:04:29 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: connectthedots
"Why is a general being trained to fly this plane, besides ego gratification?" Because he's a general?
21
posted on
01/08/2005 6:06:06 PM PST
by
StormEye
To: Gunslingr3
"The government doesn't make a secret of procurements or deployments like that."
-That is the problem.
"WTF do you expect an F-22 to protect you from anyway?"
-I'm not sure, what did you have in mind, illiterate Mongols or bow and arrow-chucking Indonesians?
22
posted on
01/08/2005 6:06:42 PM PST
by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: nuconvert
Okay - that is the coolest yet. Thanks! Hope it's not copyright!
23
posted on
01/08/2005 6:07:06 PM PST
by
Raffus
(Thanks to all Veterans for their service to our Country.)
To: nuconvert
Very nice planes for a manned unit, but this isn't the future. Human just can't handle the G's and unmanned will rule the skies IMO. You guy's playing all those video games are going to have fun in the future!
24
posted on
01/08/2005 6:08:17 PM PST
by
ttown
To: connectthedots
Why is a general being trained to fly this plane, besides ego gratification?
Because he can, really - they've got that power, so they use it.
I work in a schoolhouse (FTU - Flying Training Unit) right now, and let me tell you, the local General usually gets whatever training sorties he wants.
And that means lost sorties which could have been used for other initial quals. Which leads to delays on check rides for people who will be flying operational missions, not a desk. That puts pressure on the operational squadrons, because they are counting on those pilots arriving at a certain time.
Not that I'm bitter - General's prerogative and everything.
To: connectthedots
Why is a general being trained to fly this plane, besides ego gratification? Flight pay.
26
posted on
01/08/2005 6:08:32 PM PST
by
jackbill
To: okie01
" My vote would be the P-38. But I don't believe there are any "in the air" anymore..."
Ah yes. My first childhood sweetheart. That will always be one of the sweetest planes around. Although these F/A 22 pix are pretty sexy too. Gotta hand it to the guys that fly them.
27
posted on
01/08/2005 6:09:03 PM PST
by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: connectthedots
Why is a general being trained to fly this plane, besides ego gratification? 1) Generals who may have to order missions should have a good idea of what the plane can and cannot really do, first hand
2) If the plane was grounded for problems, and the air force is now certifying they are safe to fly, it helps morale if a general puts his butt personally on the line, not just his mouth
28
posted on
01/08/2005 6:10:16 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(We are going to fight until hell freezes over and then we are going to fight on the ice)
To: blogbat
I suppose the first F22 Raptors will go to:
- Langley AFB leaker(for sure)
- Kadena AB, Japan
- RAF Lakenheath, England
- Seymour Johnson AFB
- Elmendorf AFB
- Edwards AFB
To: Tench_Coxe
It's no secret where the planes are based and which squadrons are to be the first to fly them. That knowledge has been out there for a long time. Heck, there's been a detailed model of the F-22 (made in China, btw) available for a long time. Crazy world, huh?
30
posted on
01/08/2005 6:10:44 PM PST
by
GBA
To: blogbat
That is the problem.Why is it a problem?
I'm not sure, what did you have in mind, illiterate Mongols or bow and arrow-chucking Indonesians?
That's why I asked you. You're the one who doesn't feel safe. So I ask again, what do you expect the F-22 to protect you from?
To: okie01
There are a few P-38s still flying. Glacier Girl was restored and took to the air not long ago and I believe that Lefty Gardner's race P-38 is still flying. In case you didn't know, the original name for the F-22 was the Lighning II in honor of the original.
32
posted on
01/08/2005 6:13:29 PM PST
by
GBA
To: GBA
Just noting that discipline and surprise are a pair of a country's best friends. I've noticed we are generally faster and looser with information control than in times past.
It's just my opinion that having a detailed model of the F-22 that was made in China and imported for our fun isn't anything to brag about.
But I know that's not why we're in here right now. We're in here because we all love this plane and want to talk about how it could have only been created in this country of ours because we kick butt. Period. So I don't mean to come off to anybody as some kind of troll or any such thing. ;)
33
posted on
01/08/2005 6:16:43 PM PST
by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: GBA
"In case you didn't know, the original name for the F-22 was the Lighning II in honor of the original."
That's awesome.
34
posted on
01/08/2005 6:17:34 PM PST
by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: Gunslingr3
I think you missed my point, slinger. I think we need to better protect the assets that protect us.
35
posted on
01/08/2005 6:18:50 PM PST
by
blogbat
(Blogbat: ein Fahrgeschäft durch die Weltnachrichten)
To: blogbat
No problem. To be honest, I used to be bothered by the same stuff. Actually, the models of our most current aircraft (F-117, F-22, etc.) being made in China still bothers me.
At least we don't have a Commander-in-chief allowing missile, nuclear, satellite, etc. technologies to be more or less given to the Chicoms as we did a few years ago...at least, I don't think we do.
36
posted on
01/08/2005 6:22:23 PM PST
by
GBA
To: connectthedots
37
posted on
01/08/2005 6:24:05 PM PST
by
IGOTMINE
(Say a prayer for the common foot soldier...)
To: okie01
There is one I'm aware of...the dug her up from under an ice pack and TOTALLY restored her. (Essentially they built a new airplane and slapped the original dataplate on it.)
38
posted on
01/08/2005 6:25:24 PM PST
by
IGOTMINE
(Say a prayer for the common foot soldier...)
To: martin_fierro
Fine-looking plane.
By the way, is anyone watching Battlestar Gallactica on NBC (Sat 8PM-11PM). Nice action with the "Vipers". Captain Apollo falls in love with Starbuck (the character is now a female).
39
posted on
01/08/2005 6:26:39 PM PST
by
Ciexyz
(I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
To: zarf
I love the F-16, I made a good part of my living selling components for the F-16 in the early 1980's. At the same time it is still, now, a NATO plane, built in Europe for European pilots. The technology of the F-16 goes back to 1970's. It was a single engine,good for defense, airplane. The F-22 is a totally kick A** airplane that has moves and grooves that we will never know about. It will take any existing, or future, aircraft, Russian, French, European, what have you, DOWNTOWN! The USA rules the sky with this airplane.
40
posted on
01/08/2005 6:26:56 PM PST
by
joem15
(Truth is a formidable Force)
To: iso
Ack, one crashed on December 20th??? I was out of the country and this is the first I've heard of it. Is the pilot ok?
What happened?
41
posted on
01/08/2005 6:30:11 PM PST
by
Lx
(If dolphins are so smart, why do they live in igloos?)
To: blogbat
I think you missed my point, slinger. I think we need to better protect the assets that protect us.How exactly is the F-22 endangered by knowing what base it is at? Since they're not invisible to the naked eye, how could such information remain secret anyway? Your paranoia is unwarranted. You don't need to feel less safe because someone knows where the F-22 is based. It doesn't matter.
To: blogbat
Let 'em know, they can't touch 'em.
43
posted on
01/08/2005 6:37:22 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: GBA
Tillamok (Oregon) Air Museum has an operational P-38.
To: Lx
Pilot is okay. Report on what happened not available since Friday.
45
posted on
01/08/2005 6:42:23 PM PST
by
Raffus
(Thanks to all Veterans for their service to our Country.)
To: nuconvert
They are a beautiful piece of machinery aren't they...
46
posted on
01/08/2005 6:44:27 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: zarf
The F-16 and the B-1 are still the sexiest planes in the air.I agree. But I also hold a warm part of me for the A10. Comparing the F-16 to the A10 is similar to a contrast between an Aston Martin to a Mini Cooper. Both work extrmely well given their tasks and capabilities.
47
posted on
01/08/2005 6:45:43 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: 1rudeboy
yeah, Good thing that they didn't disclose the existence of the new super secret floating Aircraft Carrier powered by those new GE anti-gravity units.
48
posted on
01/08/2005 6:45:54 PM PST
by
PokeyJoe
(Unvarnished Truth - Your Milage May Vary)
To: pbrown
49
posted on
01/08/2005 6:46:40 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: Ciexyz
I don't like the new Battlestar Gallactica. I guess I was used to Starbuck being a guy I could drool over way back when.
50
posted on
01/08/2005 6:47:12 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-182 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson