Skip to comments.
University of Oregon tells driver to remove troop magnet
Seattle Times ^
| 1-25-05
| AP
Posted on 01/25/2005 11:14:00 PM PST by bellevuesbest
EUGENE, Ore. The University of Oregon is defending its decision to tell one of its delivery drivers to remove a "Support Our Troops" magnet from the state-owned truck he uses at work.
Oregon law prohibits personal messages on state-owned vehicles, regardless of the context.
Several months ago, driver Pete Baker put the yellow ribbon magnet on the back of the state truck.
University officials learned of the magnet and said last week it had to come off, and Baker's story quickly found its way to radio talk shows and to several military Web logs.
"I don't know how they think these are political," Baker told Eugene television station KEZI last Friday. "I think they are patriotic."
University President Dave Frohnmayer said today that Baker will face no disciplinary action, and added that he was upset that the incident has led people to question the patriotism of the university.
"The excuse that some people take in events like this to question the patriotism of other Americans is frankly below the belt," he said.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; campus; campusspeech; oregonpublicschools; orpolitics; supportthetroops; uofo; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Pete Baker is a rare breed in Eugene.
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; SAMWolf; TexasCowboy
2
posted on
01/25/2005 11:16:00 PM PST
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Proud Patriots dot ORG!!! Operation Valentine's Day!!)
To: bellevuesbest
Oregon law prohibits personal messages on state-owned vehicles, regardless of the context. Well, there you have it. Patriotic, political, whatever, it's a personal message. As long as the law isn't being selectively enforced, the magnet has to go. This is a non-story.
To: bellevuesbest
Oregon law prohibits personal messages on state-owned vehicles, regardless of the context. Sounds pretty cut and dried to me.
4
posted on
01/25/2005 11:56:33 PM PST
by
Drew68
To: bellevuesbest
University President Dave Frohnmayer said today that Baker will face no disciplinary action, and added that he was upset that the incident has led people to question the patriotism of the university. "The excuse that some people take in events like this to question the patriotism of other Americans is frankly below the belt," he said. The prez. did not have much of a choice. As the article states, it is against Oregon law to have sucg messages on state-owned vehicles.
5
posted on
01/26/2005 12:02:40 AM PST
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
To: bellevuesbest
"The excuse that some people take in events like this to question the patriotism of other Americans is frankly below the belt," he said Well, how else should it be taken? If you don't support our troops, you sure as hell aren't patriotic...
6
posted on
01/26/2005 12:22:01 AM PST
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com/)
To: bellevuesbest
Frohnmayer used to be Oregon's Att'y. General, an absolutely Classic, archetype "Oregon Liberal". Over the top sensitive, touchy-feely PC conscious to the core...
Pete is rare within Eugene, but once you stray much outside the city limits of "hippyville", from behind the Birkenstock curtain, there are real people in the 'burbs and rural areas.
If it were not for Portland (Multnomah county) and Eugene (Lane county) Oregon might be a Red State. This story is not over yet!
7
posted on
01/26/2005 12:29:35 AM PST
by
AmericanArchConservative
( <temporary tagline leased from "Taglines 'R' Us"> Lazy Anarchist Vandals for Peace)
To: Drew68
Hardly. Bear in mind the troops are federally funded and under the authority of our federal gov't., (and the state in the case of the guard). The University is also the recipient of state and fed funding. So really this is not personal expression, but one government agency generally "supporting" another.
When public employees' Labor union contracts come up for renegotiation, many of these state workers post slogans and such on fleet vehicles. Nobody dares whisper a word to them then. This is all about bowing to the PC demands of the antiwar "In" crowd that runs things in Oregon.
8
posted on
01/26/2005 12:43:08 AM PST
by
AmericanArchConservative
( <temporary tagline leased from "Taglines 'R' Us"> Lazy Anarchist Vandals for Peace)
To: AmericanArchConservative
Now there's a reply that has it exactly right. Good job.
9
posted on
01/26/2005 2:37:36 AM PST
by
Oreo Kookey
(How, indeed, do we click our tongues at beheadings and look the other way from abortion? I weep.)
To: bellevuesbest
No doubt there would be no hint of not even a whisper from them ( University of Orwell ) if that bumper sticker or magnet had any " GAY AGENDA " propaganda on it or any " FEMENIST AGENDA " on it ? would we ? Hmmmmm ???
10
posted on
01/26/2005 2:47:46 AM PST
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
I work for THE STATE in Maine. The Union representing employees frequently uses the state email system to invite members to KERRY rallies or functions for our DEM gov. Many of have complained about this abuse, but it gets nowhere.
Recently, my boss went around our workspace and told people to take down ALL personal items above 4 feet (essentially everything). I had put up a small stick flag after 9/11, as did two other workers. All three are above the four foot limit. ALL THREE are still up. I don't think my boss (or the state) wanted the hassle that would have come their way had we been required to remove those flags.
Intimidation can go both ways.
11
posted on
01/26/2005 2:59:24 AM PST
by
Rocket1968
(No more Daschle - No more Daschle)
To: bellevuesbest
Oregon law prohibits personal messages on state-owned vehicles, regardless of the context. End of story.
12
posted on
01/26/2005 3:03:00 AM PST
by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: bellevuesbest; oregon; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; ...
Oregon Ping
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.
13
posted on
01/26/2005 6:46:09 AM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Junior
Then I guess the union stickers have to come off of the state vehicles.
14
posted on
01/26/2005 9:34:33 AM PST
by
ORECON
(Condi Rice/Ann Coulter - 2008)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: bellevuesbest
Universities are private institutions, as upheld by the Supreme Court. So how can the truck be considered state owned?
16
posted on
01/26/2005 3:12:03 PM PST
by
RetroWarrior
('I will guard my post from flank to flank and take no 'crap' from any rank')
To: bellevuesbest
Time to start taking pictures.
I'm sure some of the University staff has car privileges. Not to mention some the higher muckity-mucks in the state government.
To: Echo Talon
So putting a magnet on your car is what it takes to support the troops? And those without magnets or bumperstickers do not support the troops?
18
posted on
01/26/2005 3:26:35 PM PST
by
rage24
To: rage24
So putting a magnet on your car is what it takes to support the troops? And those without magnets or bumperstickers do not support the troops? Making someone remove a magnet in support of the troops, would make you well, lets say a dolt...
19
posted on
01/26/2005 3:34:58 PM PST
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com/)
To: bellevuesbest
I'm a student at the UO-and I hate to do this, but I'm going to defend Frohnie.
In his statement posted on the University website, he said "Because the university is a state agency, I cannot make distinctions or allowances on this matter, regardless of the cause or the breadth of its support. Whether the message is "Support Our Troops," "Fund Cancer Research" or "Support Tsunami Relief," employees may not place personal stickers or magnets on state-owned vehicles."
I agree with him. Contrary to what people have said, I've seen very few state-owned vehicles in Eugene with personal stickers on them (I actually cannot recall any, but I won't say I haven't ever seen them...). Though this is a case of a rule probably needing to be bent, Frohnmayer IS right. And as a former Attorney General, he probably doesn't want to just go make things up as he goes-especially when these issues are so prominent. Trust me, my boyfriend knows the man fairly well-he didn't want to do it.
20
posted on
01/27/2005 1:36:52 AM PST
by
Kirsty-Q
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson