Thanks, Mikey!
Posted on 01/28/2005 2:43:29 PM PST by kattracks
Disgruntled conspiracy filmmaker Michael Moore blasted the Democratic Party on Thursday, saying its field of candidates for 2008 are "a lot of wimps and losers."
"The Democrats are going to have a very hard time winning the next election," he told London's Channel Four. "The Republicans have a number of star players and the Democrats have a lot of wimps and losers." Only last month Moore was calling Hillary Clinton a Democratic Party star who had a good chance of winning in 2008. But her widely reported move to the center has apparently turned him off.
Moore was particularly irked that so many Democrats, including Clinton, voted to confirm Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice this week.
"It was a disgusting sight and indicative of who the Democrats are," he told Channel Four. "They are lazy and they're cowards and I'm just hoping that the more they continue to act like that the more it will encourage Americans to run against them and put the US back in the hands of the working class, where it belongs."
Moore said the GOP is much more aggressive. "Bush and the Republicans have no shame and will resort to anything in order to win. The Democrats show up to a gun fight with a butter knife and thus they lose."
The radical movieman said he "prayed nightly" that Bush's "many scandals" would catch up to him and end his second term prematurely.
Asked if he would donate to the anti-war movement his income from, "Fahrenheit 911," which reportedly topped $150 million at the box office, Moore pled poverty.
"I haven't seen a dime from this movie!," he told Channel Four.
Instead, said Moore, "I will promise you that I will donate as much of my time as I can in the coming months to see that the anti-Bush movement transforms itself into a massive anti-war movement so we can bring these troops home."
She is notably one of the smartest women in the country. She began college at 15, and probably had her doctorate before Hitlery finished law school.LOL
She was the Provost at Stanford until 1999.
If you would like to know more, you can check out her bio here:
Giuliani (not Juliani) is a liberal. Pro-choice, pro-gay, anti-gun, pro-illegal immigration. He's a patriot, but he's a very liberal patriot. (As opposed to the anti-American scum we're used to.) God bless him for what he did for New York City, th eman is a true hero and visionary, but he makes Schwartzenegger look like Ralph Reed.
Rice needs to hold elective office.
Governors Palwenty and Sanford and, if he can pull a Reagan-esque shift on social issues, Romney are our best hopes. Owens may be climbing back to viability; in spite of his messy divorce and presumed adultery, his approval ratings are back to the high 60s.
The Democrats do have several successful governors, but I'll admit they seem to be imploding. Ed Rendell (PA) drank the Koo-Aid for Kerry; his defense of allowing felon inmates to vote while denying the right to soldiers is gonna be a tough sell. But Phil Bredesem, Mike Easley, and Mark Warner have all maanged to sell themselves in southern, red states.
The good news is that the Dems are so insane, they might pass up real potential winners for ideiological purity. Case in point: They made Vilsack go grovelling to the Reconquistadoras to forgive his lowely gringo ass for thinking learning English is a good idea (killing his chances); Even Bayh seems rejected out of hand; and as Michael Moore demosntrates, the Democrats are too stupid to know Hillary's lying.
Condi's useful because #1, she's intelligent, and #2, she can pull minority votes and the Democrats would have to play this with kid gloves or else they would come off looking like even more of the PC plantation they already are. I would put her somewhere on the ticket at least. The fact that the liberal media will call her an aunt Tom will be to our advantage.
BTW, it's not like we haven't had somebody who hasn't held an elective office as President before. There was Ike and I don't think he was that bad of a President.
Never was there a more obvious statement of the obvious.
Moore just doesn't get it.
No, Michael, your Democrats are not "wimps and losers" - - they are liars and scumbags.
This is not a hard concept to get your short, fat fingers around.
>> #2, she can pull minority votes and the Democrats would have to play this with kid gloves or else they would come off looking like even more of the PC plantation they already are.<<
It is a very well-established fact that black voters do not cross parties to vote for black Republicans, even when the Democrats turn wildly vicious and racist. But we will test your theory in 2006, when Blackwell runs for governor in Ohio.
To elebaorate slightly: Democrats make the very effective charge that black Reoublicans is a willing or unwitting puppet, or "house nigga*" of the "racist, slavemaster Republicans." Then they are free to attack a faceless puppetmaster. It works very, very well in the black community.
(*Their words, not mine. Sorry if any lurkers are offended.)
If he takes over the liberal establishment, watch the Republicans win the 2008 election 538-0...and watch conservatives take over other countries too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.