Thanks, Mikey!
Posted on 01/28/2005 2:43:29 PM PST by kattracks
She is notably one of the smartest women in the country. She began college at 15, and probably had her doctorate before Hitlery finished law school.LOL
She was the Provost at Stanford until 1999.
If you would like to know more, you can check out her bio here:
Giuliani (not Juliani) is a liberal. Pro-choice, pro-gay, anti-gun, pro-illegal immigration. He's a patriot, but he's a very liberal patriot. (As opposed to the anti-American scum we're used to.) God bless him for what he did for New York City, th eman is a true hero and visionary, but he makes Schwartzenegger look like Ralph Reed.
Rice needs to hold elective office.
Governors Palwenty and Sanford and, if he can pull a Reagan-esque shift on social issues, Romney are our best hopes. Owens may be climbing back to viability; in spite of his messy divorce and presumed adultery, his approval ratings are back to the high 60s.
The Democrats do have several successful governors, but I'll admit they seem to be imploding. Ed Rendell (PA) drank the Koo-Aid for Kerry; his defense of allowing felon inmates to vote while denying the right to soldiers is gonna be a tough sell. But Phil Bredesem, Mike Easley, and Mark Warner have all maanged to sell themselves in southern, red states.
The good news is that the Dems are so insane, they might pass up real potential winners for ideiological purity. Case in point: They made Vilsack go grovelling to the Reconquistadoras to forgive his lowely gringo ass for thinking learning English is a good idea (killing his chances); Even Bayh seems rejected out of hand; and as Michael Moore demosntrates, the Democrats are too stupid to know Hillary's lying.
Condi's useful because #1, she's intelligent, and #2, she can pull minority votes and the Democrats would have to play this with kid gloves or else they would come off looking like even more of the PC plantation they already are. I would put her somewhere on the ticket at least. The fact that the liberal media will call her an aunt Tom will be to our advantage.
BTW, it's not like we haven't had somebody who hasn't held an elective office as President before. There was Ike and I don't think he was that bad of a President.
Never was there a more obvious statement of the obvious.
Moore just doesn't get it.
No, Michael, your Democrats are not "wimps and losers" - - they are liars and scumbags.
This is not a hard concept to get your short, fat fingers around.
>> #2, she can pull minority votes and the Democrats would have to play this with kid gloves or else they would come off looking like even more of the PC plantation they already are.<<
It is a very well-established fact that black voters do not cross parties to vote for black Republicans, even when the Democrats turn wildly vicious and racist. But we will test your theory in 2006, when Blackwell runs for governor in Ohio.
To elebaorate slightly: Democrats make the very effective charge that black Reoublicans is a willing or unwitting puppet, or "house nigga*" of the "racist, slavemaster Republicans." Then they are free to attack a faceless puppetmaster. It works very, very well in the black community.
(*Their words, not mine. Sorry if any lurkers are offended.)
If he takes over the liberal establishment, watch the Republicans win the 2008 election 538-0...and watch conservatives take over other countries too...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.