Skip to comments.Woman Hospitalized From Botched Abortion Dies From Complications
Posted on 01/30/2005 9:48:56 AM PST by underlying
Wichita, KS (LifeNews.com) -- A Kansas woman rushed to a local hospital after her abortion at a late-term abortion facility was botched has died. The 32 year-old woman was transported to Wesley Medical Center on January 13 from the abortion business owned and operated by late-term abortion practitioner George Tiller.
According to one source, who spoke with the pro-life group Operation Rescue, she arrived at the hospital with "severe hemorrhaging" and died "a few days later" from undetermined causes the source said "are very likely to be the result of a botched abortion."
According to 911 transcripts the group obtained, Tiller employee Marguerite Reed called for an ambulance after the abortion was botched.
The record indicates Reed was "very evasive" and "refused to give any information about the patient."
Later, Reed told 911 operators the woman suffered from "pain above the belly button." Reed said the woman was awake and alert and did not suffer from chest pain.
Troy Newman, president of the group, called on Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius to ask the Kansas Board of Health Arts, which monitors doctors in the state, to investigate. His group filed a complaint with the state agency.
He also faulted Governor Sebelius for vetoing a bill that would have further regulated abortion facilities.
"I question the judgment of Governor Sebelius in vetoing the clinic regulation act," Newman said.
"That statue could very well have prevented this needless and tragic death," Newman added. "Our prayer of concern and sympathy go out to the family and loved ones for the untimely death of mother and child."
Operation Rescue officials say this is the fourth ambulance trip from Tiller's abortion facility to Wesley in the last 13 months.
Related web sites:
View the 911 transcript -
There is no question about when human life begins.
The widely used medical textbook The Developing Human, Clinically Oriented Embryology, 6th Edition, Moore, Persaud, Saunders, 1998, states at page 2 that "The intricate processes by which a baby develops from a single cell are miraculous .... This cell [the zygote] results from the union of an oocyte [egg] and sperm. A zygote is the beginning of a new human being ...." At page 18 this theme is repeated: "Human development begins at fertilization [emphasis in original] ...."
Judge Michael J. Noonan ruled as follows in a New Jersey case based on a man's efforts to save his unborn child from being aborted: " based upon the undisputed medical testimony by arguably the foremost authority in genetics in the world, I found that human life begins as conception; and that Roe vs. Wade permits a legal execution of that human being." (MUNICIPAL COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - MORRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL ACTION DOCKET NO. C1771, ET SEQ. STATE OF NEW JERSEY V. ALEXANDER LOCE, et als. DEFENDANTS APRIL 29, 1991 HONORABLE MICHAEL J. NOONAN)
Dr. Jerome Lejeune, "Father of Modern Genetics" and discoverer of the cause of Down's Syndrome, stated, "To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion . . . it is plain experimental evidence."
Dr. Hymie Gordon, Chairman, Department of Genetics at Mayo Clinic, stated, "By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception."
Sir William Liley, a key pioneer of fetal therapy, wrote a famous article in 1972, The Foetus as a Personality, in which he shows us why we have moved away from the view of the fetus as an inert, unformed passenger awaiting arrival at the destination of life, and have seen that the fetus is a splendidly functioning human, full of vigor and very much in command of the pregnancy.
Men and women of science might often approve of abortion, but that is a judgment about the value of human life, not about the scientific fact that human life exists. We present to you below some of the visual evidence that, indeed, we have a brother, a sister, in the womb.
Click below to listen to the heartbeat of an unborn child.
Heartbeat at: 9.5 weeks; 11.5 weeks; 15 weeks; 26 weeks; 32 weeks (All ages noted here are LMP; therefore the baby's age from fertilization is actually two weeks younger than the number. These heart tones were recorded through a Doppler speaker by Dr. David M. Ramsey, III.)
Ultrasound on the Web:
One of the reasons abortion continues is that the victims are largely unseen.
Yet in our day, they have become more visible than ever before, thanks to a wide variety of imaging techniques that allow us not only to view, but also to diagnose and operate on the unborn child.
Ultrasound is one of those imaging techniques. Following are some links that will help you to understand this technique.
http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/ (a comprehensive guide to obstetric ultrasound)
http://www.medison.com/ (3D ultrasound)
For those who support the so-called "right to choose," a key question is whether or not they are willing to let the woman see what she is choosing to destroy. Note: While these pictures are posted freely on the Web for all to see, they are still the property of the owners, and so it is not OK to copy the pictures without their owner's permission.
Note: While these pictures are posted freely on the Web for all to see, they are still the property of the owners, and so it is not OK to copy the pictures without their owner's permission.
Priests for Life
PO Box 141172
Staten Island, NY 10314
Tel. 888-PFL-3448, (718) 980-4400
Subscribe to Fr. Frank's bi-weekly prolife column (free): email@example.com This site is updated Online Hosting by: Catholic Online
Search || Crisis Pregnancy Help || About Us ll Support our Work
Latest News || Guestbook || About Other Groups
This site is updateddaily!
Online Hosting by: Catholic Online
Hey Trial Lawyers!
Abortionists are the largest unregulated industry in the US.
Payback from a higher authority...
I am very sorry for this poor, uninformed woman who has died after consenting to kill her own baby.
Abortion clinics in many or most states are COMPLETELY UNREGULATED, because abortion organizations, with the eager help of liberal, activist judges, refuse to permit any regulatory oversight of abortion AT ALL.
George Tiller is probably the single worst abortionist in our entire country. He operates a huge late-term abortion facility which handles patients from all over the country. He also specializes in partial-birth abortions.
Most abortion clinics are riddled with medically unsafe conditions and lack the kind of emergency back-up available in hospitals, because doing things properly might cut down on profits. Also because most of the best doctors and nurses prefer not to be involved in this murderous and disgusting business.
I hope some powerful lawyer sues the hell out of him. Negligent death of the mother is often the only way that an abortion doctor can be stopped from continuing his deadly activities.
Bump. I pity the hospital that's close to this "outpatient" operation. Watch this butcher try to blame the ER.
And they have Government backing.
This particular case is a sad ending to an American tragedy.
The most highly compensated physicians in the US are specialty surgeons who have to go in for several years of additional school--even they, at the very top of their earning capacity in their late thirties and early forties (after their original practice debt and school debts are paid), gross around $400K. (take taxes and malpractice out of that)
Just to give you context.
"Negligent death of the mother is often the only way that an abortion doctor can be stopped from continuing his deadly activities."
Wasn't that what HILLARY! demanded in any abortion bill ... the protection of the mother?
Not only should the doctor(s) be sued, but the congress critters that have put their name to any and all abortion bills that have led up to this death.
John Edwards ... there are TWO people to channel here ... how's your antennae?
How come the abortionist isn't dead?
This kind of thing happens a whole lot more often than is reported. Anyone stupid enough to go to an abortionist in the first place --- thinking that abortionists are somehow good highly qualified doctors is almost an example of Darwinism at work. Abortionists are the scum of doctors who usually are never going to succeed at saving lives so choose to end lives because it's technically very easy to kill.
If she was 16, being forced by her parents to have an abortion to save their own social status, I could feel sorry --- but at 32 years old? She knew she was having her own baby killed --- she's an adult and now has suffered the same fate as her poor baby.
The last data I saw for veterinarians was $40K per year and nurses $30K per year. Pharmacists average $100K per year. This was just back in November at a business seminar that included a talk about professional salaries and education.
Depends on how you look at it. "Making" money and "netting" are two entirely different things. I'll bet those docs you "know" would love to be as well-paid as you think they are--but it's all part of the resentment legend. It's like when someone is complaining about a "doctor's bill" and when you look at it, 90% is a hospitalization infrastructure bill. But if you think that the numbers you quote are nets, I guess you did choose the wrong school. However, you'll like your patients more and have to spend less time with lawyers.
I know an oncologist who is in her mid 40s and makes over $400k per year. She also gets 12 weeks of paid vacation per year.
Are you sure about this? I am a pharmacist's daughter and sister-in-law. It sounds awfully high to me, but perhaps I am out of date.
I think your numbers are high for family docs and pediatrics - some where around $100K right out of residency in some areas, with 4 weeks vacation and some other perks. Medical Economics carries the average salaries each year. I never made the "average," but I had other priorities and was self-financed for 11 years, not employed. And now, working for someone else, I'm only part time. (Heh,heh!)
ME's articles on
Physician's earnings (FP's median total compensation $150K)
i thought the reason for legal abortions was to get rid of the coat hanger method. apparentally a "legal" abortion is no safer. another point to bring out to those baby-killing nuts.
After 15 weeks, it's much safer to carry the child to term and delivery than to undergo an elective abortion. That's one reason that the people of Texas have decided that all abortions after 15 weeks must be done in ambulatory surgical centers or hospitals. And we don't allow elective abortions after 23 weeks, only those for health reasons (although the definition of "health" is wider than I'd like and includes fetal anomaly.)
I think it depends on the region.
Not in my book you aren't. I have been around TB's (not to mention my pet dogs) all my life and have at times wished for an MD for myself half as good, knowledgable, and caring as my VMD!
All legality did was legalize what the abortionists were already doing --- and many of the back-alley abortionists were the same kind of doctors --- so bad they couldn't ever practice real medicine --- saving lives is an art. It doesn't take much knowledge to cut a baby into pieces to kill it.
A coat hanger can perforate a uterus and a scalpel can do it just as well.
Why the drop after 1960? (in deaths of women from illegal abortions)
The reasons were new and better antibiotics, better surgery and the establishment of intensive care units in hospitals. This was in the face of a rising population. Between 1967 and 1970 sixteen states legalized abortion. In most it was limited, only for rape, incest and severe fetal handicap (life of mother was legal in all states). There were two big exceptions California in 1967, and New York in 1970 allowed abortion on demand. Now look at the chart carefully.
· 25.5% of women deciding to have an abortion want to postpone childbearing
· 21.3% of women cannot afford a baby
· 14.1% of women have a relationship issue or their partner does not want a child
· 12.2% of women are too young (their parents or others object to the pregnancy)
· 10.8% of women feel a child will disrupt their education or career
· 7.9% of women want no (more) children
· 3.3% of women have an abortion due to a risk to fetal health
2.8% of women have an abortion due to a risk to maternal health
So how many womens lives have been saved by abortion?
Only about 3% of abortions since 1972 were reported to be due to a risk to maternal health. A reasonable person would recognize that not all of those cases represent a lethal risk. But lets say they did. That means that nearly 45 million fetuses were butchered to save the lives of about 1.3 million women. Or put another way; 35 babies are killed to save each woman.
Abortion was legal in all 50 states prior to Roe v. Wade in cases of danger to the life of the woman.
How can the abortionist be considered any kind of doctor? He botches the procedure and then refuses to cooperate with vital information for the doctors who have to clean up his mess? The only ethic there is CYA.
We should hate the sin and not the sinner. I agree that this woman should have known better. She could have carried her baby to term and offered it for adoption if she had reasons for not wanting a child.
It's still a sad business. I take no pleasure in the death of a sinner.
Father Frank Pavone, founder of Priests for Life, was invited to speak at our parish in Scarsdale many years ago. I remember his saying that with each abortion the woman suffers as well as the baby, and that it was not too late for even women who have had numerous abortions to repent their sins and stop killing their babies.
After Roe v. Wade was announced, Leftists imagined that they would win the battle because all the women who had abortions would become lifetime supporters of abortion and vote accordingly. That has not proven to be the case. Some of them are hopeless and never learn, but many have learned, repented, and come over to the side of life. This young woman will never have that chance for repentance and conversion.
I guess George wasn't satisfied with killing only children!
George doesn't carry much malpractice insurance. After all most of his patients die. He could only get sued if the patient (baby) lives.
There are a lot of hugely wealthy physicians, but if you take a look (one that's not clouded through a haze of resentful green) you'll see that they either inherited their wealth or that they own a business or have been canny investors. The wealth has not come from fees. You might try the business thing, yourself, when you stop pouting.
He was just a GP in family practice so his malpractice insurance was a pittance compared to an OB-GYN so that wasn't squeezing his ability to bring home a bigger net. You've got it right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.