Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Maybe there will now be infighting among the terrorists in Iraq and we will be able to take advantage of that.
1 posted on 01/31/2005 4:25:14 AM PST by PopGonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PopGonzalez
Actually I expect the purple finger brigade is going to make life very difficult for the terrorists. It's their country now, and after what I saw yesterday on TV, they are up to it.
BTW - Anyone notice the perky one is wearing black today? With some kind of really wierd necklace.
2 posted on 01/31/2005 4:32:05 AM PST by ProudVet77 (Survivor of the great blizzard of aught five)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez

While Teddy and all the other American nay sayers stew in their own nasty bile. Michael Moore, Hollywood, etc. are all wrong and probably PO'd that freedom is taking place in the Middle East under the aegis of George Bush. "How can that happen?" "Nobody I knew voted for him?"

Eat some crow Dimos.


3 posted on 01/31/2005 4:32:29 AM PST by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez

Boy, this must hurt over on Turtle Bay and in Brussels.


4 posted on 01/31/2005 4:34:26 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez
Yep. If you want to understand the Left's viewpoint on Iraq - look at this Ted Rall rant. Its not any different from the nsk nsk nsking over on DU:

The Iraqi Resistance

First and foremost, let's get our terms straight. There is no democratic process in Iraq. Iraq is occupied by 150,000 U.S. troops. The Baath and other parties are proscribed from participating in elections or holding public office. In a real democracy, voters are free to choose from any party. In a real democracy, a foreign occupation force does not exert any political influence whatsoever. And in a real democracy, people aren't afraid to venture out into the streets, risking rape or kidnapping in order to vote. You can't have democracy without basic security, period.

So this is not democracy.

Which gets us to the next term: "Iraqi judges," etc. By definition anyone who holds public office in an occupied country is a collaborator. This would include, for example, Palestinian Authority "leaders" under the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Now a collaborator may or not be a good person, and he may or may not be laboring under a benevolent occupier, but he is certainly a collaborator and thus a fair target for nationalist/patriotic resistance forces seeking to expel the occupiers.

Collaborators are, in some ways, even more of an enemy to the Iraqi resistance than the Americans. They demoralize the resistance and set an example of subservience that other Iraqis may emulate. It's not surprising, therefore, that Iraqi guerillas would choose to execute them.

The puppet regime is already a given. And the election is a lame attempt to legitimatize that puppet regime. Iraqis who vote in this show election are no different than Frenchmen who cheered Marshall Pétain during the Nazi occupation. Had there been an "election" under Vichy rule, it would have been the patriotic duty of every Frenchman to boycott it.

I can and do admit when I'm wrong, as readers of the Rallblog well know. And, by the way, I checked into the comparisons with the Nazi "werewolves" resistance after the fall of Germany at the end of World War II. As I wrote originally, there are no documented cases of casualties inflicted by them. None. They may have cut a few power lines, but they had nothing like the effectiveness of the current Iraqi resistance fighters--to which the Hard Right tried to compare them.

For the record: I don't share the vision of radical Islamism that some of the anti-US resistance in Iraq apparently wants to impose on Iraq and the Middle East. I wish nothing more than to see the people of the world rise up, overthrow their dictators and autocrats, and create just, peaceful, representative political and economic systems that reward people for their hard work and provide security in their everyday lives. Taliban-like theocracies are obviously antiethical to that goal.

But ultimately it's up to the citizens of each nation to decide for themselves, sometimes via civil war and acts of violence, to determine how they want to live. Who is to say that my vision, that our vision of democracy, is best for every country? Besides, we still have too much work to do here in the United States of America before we can hold ourselves up as a shining beacon of hope to the rest of the world. We have an unelected dictator for a a"president," a nation that denies tens of millions of people access to basic healthcare, kids throwing their unwanted babies into Dumpsters, young adults plunged into student loan poverty, systemic racism that divides our cities and suburbs into haves and have-nots, a wildly inadequate retirement system that the ruling party is trying to get rid of--like I said, we have a lot of work to do.

The choice between radical Islam and American-style pseudodemocracy is a false one presented by the Hard Right. There is 0.0% danger that Islamists will take over the United States. And it is 0.0% our business whether it takes over other countries.

For Ted Rall and his ilk, there's no moral difference between Generalissimo Busho and the Iraqi terrorists - which he prefers to glorify as a "resistance." Which belies his claim he wants to see genuine freedom spread around the planet. For Rall, its of no concern if Islamonazis take over the world. After all America deserves what she gets and 9/11 never happened. Like DUH. No wonder the Left thinks Iraq's first free elections were a sham.

Denny Crane: "I want two things. First God and then Fox News."

7 posted on 01/31/2005 4:42:03 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez
World leaders have praised the conduct of Iraq's first multi-party elections for more than 50 years.

And UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said Iraqis should be encouraged to take control of their own future.


These two sentences don't go together in my book. Kofi Annan IS NOT A WORLD LEADER, no matter how much the left wants to make him our "world leader".
9 posted on 01/31/2005 4:45:59 AM PST by demkicker (I'm Ra th er sick of Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez
World Leaders Praise Iraqi Poll

I suppose it would be too much to ask, though, to have them credit the USA, the Brits, their policies and their troops and their blood and anguish, with having been responsible, and sine qua non, for this process and outcome? Naaaaaaaaah.

10 posted on 01/31/2005 4:57:40 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez

Has anyone seen or heard comments from John Howard yet?


11 posted on 01/31/2005 5:17:29 AM PST by texasflower ("America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one." President George W. Bush 01/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PopGonzalez
Dear DUmmies, Moonbats, UN Buzzards, and EU Weasels:

BITE ME!


13 posted on 01/31/2005 6:12:53 AM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ValerieUSA; Alex Marko; Alouette; anotherview; ...

a bump, and related topics:

America's beachhead rattles local monarchs
(New lib spin: US’s Iraqi puppet will go Chuckie on us!)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | February 1, 2005
Paul McGeough, Chief Herald Correspondent in Baghdad
Posted on 01/31/2005 7:20:56 AM PST by dead
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1332590/posts

Birth of U.S. was rocky, too (Iraq vote - Canadian point of view)
National Post (Canada) ^ | Mon 31 Jan 2005 | Lorne Gunter
Posted on 01/31/2005 7:25:39 AM PST by GMMAC
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1332597/posts

Iraq's real resistance fights back
(Leftists & terrorists endure counterattack by democratic forces)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | February 1, 2005 | Gerard Henderson
Posted on 01/31/2005 7:35:46 AM PST by dead
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1332607/posts

New York Mosque Teaches Hatred, Violence
New York Sun ^ | Jan 31, '05 | MEGHAN CLYNE
Posted on 01/31/2005 6:19:46 AM PST by dianaA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1332551/posts

Outspoken Christians Stalked by Islamists
New York Sun ^ | Jan 31, '05 | DAVEED GARTENSTEIN-ROSS
Posted on 01/31/2005 6:15:19 AM PST by dianaA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1332547/posts


15 posted on 01/31/2005 8:16:45 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Ted "Kids, I Sunk the Honey" Kennedy is just a drunk who's never held a job (or had to).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson