Skip to comments.
Prince Charles to Marry Camilla Parker Bowles
FOX News ^
| Feb.10, 2005
Posted on 02/10/2005 9:40:34 AM PST by nuconvert
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-258 next last
To: nuconvert
They will be married in a largely private civil ceremony One can only hope. Spare me the coverage please.
81
posted on
02/10/2005 10:30:42 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: j_k_l
On this day Charles kissed his bride. He
was bedding this married women...
Charles is not to be trusted.
Nice going Charles...
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: nuconvert
84
posted on
02/10/2005 10:35:19 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: TheBigB
The British need to import again, IMHO! It's the only hope for the royal line!
85
posted on
02/10/2005 10:37:38 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: TheBigB
yes, more princess madeline.... although she hit some 85 year old lady in her Lexus SUV
Comment #87 Removed by Moderator
To: John_Wheatley
That would make the most sense.
88
posted on
02/10/2005 10:39:01 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: LibFreeOrDie
Wish we had access to the video...that SNL skit was a riot!
To: John_Wheatley
I don't think she is ugly but I do have to wonder about her.
I wonder how she liked sharing Charles when he was married to Diana and having babies with her? I think they deserve each other.
90
posted on
02/10/2005 10:43:50 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Protagoras
But the wedding presents will be more expensive.
91
posted on
02/10/2005 10:44:20 AM PST
by
kalee
(Kalee's Tinfoil Bonnets, purveyor of stylish tinfoil bonnets since 2000)
To: John_Wheatley
Indeed true. I was mostly alluding to the distant past.
92
posted on
02/10/2005 10:44:54 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: nuconvert
Very interesting as there is no way for Charles to get out of being king. It's just the way it goes. It doesn't skip a generation unless that generation is dead. Camilla won't be the Princess of Wales, so I guess she will merely be his consort.
93
posted on
02/10/2005 10:46:23 AM PST
by
Bella_Bru
(You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
To: kalee
Oh,, I knew it must be important for some reason.
94
posted on
02/10/2005 10:48:31 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(Un-apprehended criminals have no credibility when advocating for the WOD)
To: nuconvert
One more nail in the coffin of the Anglican Church.
95
posted on
02/10/2005 10:54:53 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Comment #96 Removed by Moderator
To: TheBigB
Those are two beautiful young ladies.
I wonder what they are like on the inside. They look as if they would be very nice.
97
posted on
02/10/2005 10:58:04 AM PST
by
It's me
To: nmh
I wonder how she liked sharing Charles when he was married to Diana and having babies with her? I think they deserve each other. It is really creepy to me. Granted, lots of folks slam Di, and yes, she had problems, but dang. I don't think many women would have put up with that crap.
98
posted on
02/10/2005 11:01:23 AM PST
by
najida
(I actually repaired my Skil saw last night without breaking a nail.)
To: ValenB4
To his credit, he is apparently not a superficial person. WHAT!!??
Then why did he marry Diana?
99
posted on
02/10/2005 11:01:48 AM PST
by
It's me
To: nuconvert
I'm still trying to figure out why he cheated on her:
To be with her:
Love is truly blind...
100
posted on
02/10/2005 11:01:49 AM PST
by
Reagan is King
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-258 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson