Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starburst Was One of Brightest Objects Observed on Earth
NY Times ^ | February 18, 2005 | KENNETH CHANG

Posted on 02/18/2005 9:31:11 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: neverdem
The dimmest object ever observed on Earth:

... and the widest object ever observed on Earth:


21 posted on 02/18/2005 11:35:27 PM PST by thoughtomator (If Islam is a religion, so is Liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I'll read it tomorrow. I just read:

Starbucks Was One of Brightest Objects Observed on Earth

It's 2:30 am..lol


22 posted on 02/18/2005 11:39:17 PM PST by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It was really done to fool the Cylons...


23 posted on 02/18/2005 11:42:33 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel ("Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Here's a picture!


24 posted on 02/19/2005 1:11:47 AM PST by ThreeYearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Since the object in question is 50 thousand light years away, the December event is a "delayed report" of an event at the object 50 thousand years ago (supposing that the speed of light in a vacuum really is constant over time).

Likely there are many other "delayed reports" out there. For all we know, the center of our galaxy detonated thousands of years ago and will, in due course, sweep away our world entirely. It's due for something like that anyway (2Pet3:10-13), although the timing is obscure.


25 posted on 02/19/2005 2:13:38 AM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This was posted twice before, the first time with the NASA title:
Cosmic Explosion Among the Brightest in Recorded History; and the someone posted it a second time, using some other title:
Brightest Galactic Flash Ever Detected Hits Earth.
26 posted on 02/19/2005 4:30:30 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
dead star went boom.

It's fallen and it can't get up.

27 posted on 02/19/2005 8:05:33 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It's called SGR 1806-20 and is in the constellation Sagittarius, which is abbreviated SGR, so I thought the designation must be from its location until I read that SGR means "soft gamma repeater." Good thing it wasn't a hard gamma repeater.

Its magnetic field is a quadrillion times that of earth. We're talking serious numbers here--one quadrillion is 1000 times one trillion.

Meanwhile, today is the birthday of Nicolaus Copernicus, the founder of modern astronomy.

28 posted on 02/19/2005 8:09:10 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This happened just before or just after the big tsunami?


29 posted on 02/19/2005 8:09:42 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

As I've been saying for years, this is the main reason why we should not transport White Castles cheeseburgers into the sun.


30 posted on 02/19/2005 8:39:55 AM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

The NASA news release was linked in the first comment. I find that it's interesting to have more than one perspective. Thank's for the other link.


31 posted on 02/19/2005 9:47:21 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the article you linked: Another clue to the pulsar/magnetar difference may lie in how fast neutron stars are spinning when they form. Gaensler and his team suggest that heavy stars will form neutron stars spinning at up to 500-1000 times per second. Such rapid rotation should power a dynamo and generate superstrong magnetic fields. 'Normal' neutron stars are born spinning at only 50-100 times per second, preventing the dynamo from working and leaving them with a magnetic field 1000 times weaker, says Gaensler.

HA! I knew there was something weird about that rotation rate!. Thanks for the link Ernest.

32 posted on 02/19/2005 10:49:09 AM PST by zeugma (Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies! (Made from the finest girlscouts!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
The bigger those stars are , the more they have magical properties. If you haven't read thru all of that link at post #17, try to find the time, it is quite good. The Universe is an astounding place. A great Book Reference is 100 Billion Suns, although it is somewhat dated, nothing about Magnetars, as I recall. My Son has my copy, so I can't check.
33 posted on 02/19/2005 11:09:34 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Makes me wonder what's the possibility of a star exploding nearby and causing massive comm failure worldwide.


34 posted on 02/19/2005 2:26:41 PM PST by Bogey78O (Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

I hear Moore is much fatter. His mass is so huge though it distorts his true appearance.


35 posted on 02/19/2005 2:28:11 PM PST by Bogey78O (Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Makes me wonder what's the possibility of a star exploding nearby and causing massive comm failure worldwide.

If by expoding star you mean a supernova, there are three likely candidates nearby, astronomically speaking: Betelgeuse in Orion, Antares in Scorpio and Ras Algethi in Hercules. They are 430, 600 and 380 light years away, respectively.

Chances of one of those three becoming a supernova in the near future seem slim.

Someone more knowledgeable than me will have to address the subject of communications disruptions.

The visual effect would be stunning: image a pinpoint of light brighter than the aggregate light of the full moon --but not as bright as the sun.

There is an interesting discussion of supernovae at this web site:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/supernova/

36 posted on 02/19/2005 4:49:05 PM PST by ngc6656
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ngc6656

Ever since I stopped studying astronomy in junior high it's all greek to me.


37 posted on 02/19/2005 8:26:33 PM PST by Bogey78O (*tagline removed per request*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; KevinDavis

thanks E for the ping.


38 posted on 02/20/2005 2:01:20 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("Are you an over due book? Because you've got FINE written all over you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson