Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.J. Teacher Charged with Sexaul Assault (Here we go again)
WPVI (ABC Philadelphia) ^ | 2/21/2005 | NORA MUCHANIC

Posted on 02/21/2005 8:05:45 PM PST by wjersey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator

To: nopardons

Thanks nopardons


122 posted on 02/21/2005 10:31:06 PM PST by deepFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
I'll explain it to you once more....the nic is NOPARDONS!

Where are the supposed "insults" that you accuse me of "tossing"?

You wrote about me,playing juvenile games with my nic and your didn't ping me.That's against FR rules,pet.

When you manage to grow up,follow FR's posting rules,and decide to answer questions asked of you....get back to me.

123 posted on 02/21/2005 10:31:27 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: deepFR

:-)


124 posted on 02/21/2005 10:32:39 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: infidel44

I have not equated the two, but there is a parallel. Both teachers and priests are entrusted to look out for our children. they are both entrusted to teach our children. they are both entrusted to look out for the welfare of our children.

We have a similar trend of improper sexual conduct between people who are supposed to be looking out for our children in both the Catholic priesthoood and the public school system. You're trying to say it's different because of the kind of sex the respective groups were involved in, I'm saying it's a similar violation regardless of the particular sex act because both sets of instances involve a violation of trust. Sex is sex is sex. It matters little whether you find one sex act more perverted than another; what matters in this discussion is that adults entrusted wiith peoples' children had sex with their children. It sounds to me like it would be okay with you if a priest had sex with a 12 year old girl because they'd be having heterosexual sex..

the few times that sex abuse cases came up regardng the Catholic church was enough for the media to begin decrying the church as a whole, and thereby begin a long period of fomenting dissent in the ranks. I don't see such an outcry in this instance and there should be: the Public schools have been gettiing away with their own brand of corruption for too long. Now they've got teachers sleeping with students. Where's the outrage?


125 posted on 02/21/2005 10:40:46 PM PST by Cosmo (Got wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

To: Paul Atreides
Mike Riley/VICTIM'S ATTORNEY: "The young man is not in a position where he has the legal capacity to give legal consent.... The shock of this relationship being exposed, the intense news interest in the relationship, the fact that he obviously has feelings for this young lady.

That ain't no lady; that's just a cheap lay; a woman of no virtue.

He's 14 now, in early 2005; BUT she met him in 2003, and students were suspicious of them then.

Definitely a NABWLA (hypothetical NAMBLA's sister org) hall of famer.

127 posted on 02/21/2005 10:50:25 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
A male teacher, at my high school, who was 26 messed around with a 16 year old student, consentually... it was well known that she DID approach him, one of those grades for sex things.

He not only lost his job as a teacher, he was stripped of his commission as an Officer, and discharged from the National Guard for it.

But that was back in 1980.
128 posted on 02/21/2005 10:54:12 PM PST by WindOracle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

To: Elmer Piddlestone
There are many rules that have been posted on threads,but aren't under the box we use to post replies.

There are special threads for newbies (HTML SANDBOX,FR'S HISTORY,FR SLANG,etc.) which are archived (yes,FR has an archive!)and get reposted from time to time.

If I can help you with getting acclimated to FR,please drop me a note in FREEPmail. :-)

130 posted on 02/21/2005 11:06:17 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Elmer Piddlestone

And welcome to FR! :-)


131 posted on 02/21/2005 11:06:49 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
To save everyone the trouble of posting, I will instead post a summary of typical posts on this subject to date:

Best post all week!

132 posted on 02/21/2005 11:14:01 PM PST by Odyssey-x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: infidel44


"What I disagree with you about is that you are equating this Catholic Priest Perversion with a Male to Female relationship"

-- what else am I to infer from this sentence other than the type of sex is what has you concerned? Andso what if "you said" it's illegal.it's illegal for an adult to have sex with a minor, and especially egregious an offense when this occurs in a situation in which the adult is supposed to be lookking out ffor the child's welfare. It's all illegal.: teacher/underage student, priest/underage boy, underage girl etc. etc..



Perhaps I should have phrased things differently (it's late) : (referring to your second paragraph, here) It only took a relatively few cases of perverted priests for the media to have an uproar. subsequently , after much investigation, other cases startedd to emerge. I did not mean to imply that these priests were not guilty. But, If the media were as outraged by this student/teacher problem (as I believe they should be, but understand why they aren't) , we'd see alot of cases come out of the woodwork. And I suspect they'd be as --if not more -- numerous as the pedophilic priest debacles.


133 posted on 02/21/2005 11:16:42 PM PST by Cosmo (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Elmer Piddlestone
Actually this case is no different than if it were a male teacher with a female student because both cases would involve an adult committing a crime against a child. If they find this female teacher guilty of this crime, I hope she is sentenced to at least 10 years in prison.

I know a guy who worked in corrections at state and federal levels for years. Back when the Deborah LaFave incident made the news, I talked to him about the ramifications of a young adult female doing prison time for statutory rape of a male student.

Just as I suspected, in the womens' correctional centers, there is no major stigma related to such a crime. Where a man incarcerated for such crimes against an underage female will be lucky to survive to see the outside world, for a woman it is viewed as no big deal, and in some cases women so convicted enjoy a bit of "celebrity". So much for the deterrance factor.

134 posted on 02/21/2005 11:23:36 PM PST by Cloud William (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #135 Removed by Moderator

To: Servant of the 9

IMO, It's the older woman thing that started with American Pie.


136 posted on 02/21/2005 11:27:53 PM PST by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #137 Removed by Moderator

To: Elmer Piddlestone
HTML Help Threads & Other Info for Newbies
(And Anyone Else Who Needs It)




138 posted on 02/21/2005 11:29:45 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Elmer Piddlestone

You're most welcome. :-)


139 posted on 02/21/2005 11:30:25 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Elmer Piddlestone

You're welcome! :-)


140 posted on 02/21/2005 11:31:00 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson