Skip to comments.
Clarence Thomas still a bad choice, Anita Hill says
Grand Rapids Press ^
| 2/23/05
Posted on 02/23/2005 2:08:35 PM PST by KidGlock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
1
posted on
02/23/2005 2:08:38 PM PST
by
KidGlock
To: KidGlock
You mean soon-to-be Chief Justice Thomas?
2
posted on
02/23/2005 2:10:37 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
To: KidGlock
Thank you for expressing your insignificant little opinion, Anita.
Now sit down and shut up.
3
posted on
02/23/2005 2:11:14 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: KidGlock
In the 13 years since Anita Hill lied during Senate confirmation hearings about alleged sexual harassment by then-Supreme Court Justice nominee Clarence Thomas,
4
posted on
02/23/2005 2:11:28 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: KidGlock
More words of wisdom from Anita Hill.
5
posted on
02/23/2005 2:11:58 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
To: KidGlock
Who is Anita Hill? What does this twit have to say that is relevent?
6
posted on
02/23/2005 2:12:25 PM PST
by
TommyDale
To: KidGlock
Anita Hill is the best example of why there should not be affirmative action.
She was drug off the farm and placed in situations far beyond her capacity. As a chosen one she was yanked up the chain with a wink and a nod.
Finallly, when she got to DC and placed in competition with real black girls who actually knew their stuff did she realize it was all a sham.
Anita Hill is an American travesty.
7
posted on
02/23/2005 2:12:38 PM PST
by
bert
(Peace is only halftime !)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Once a skank, always a skank.
8
posted on
02/23/2005 2:12:39 PM PST
by
KidGlock
(W-1)
To: KidGlock
Yes, she gave birth to the "It's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge" tack the Left loves to take (when the charges are against Republicans).
9
posted on
02/23/2005 2:12:56 PM PST
by
Guillermo
("Now how can a Puerto Rican lose a fly ball in the sun?' - Harry Caray)
To: Yo-Yo; pabianice
If he is indeed nominated as CJSC, do you think the Dems on the SJC would dare call her as a witness?
10
posted on
02/23/2005 2:13:18 PM PST
by
ken5050
(The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
To: KidGlock
Justice Thomas' rulings have long since discredited his old critics...and it is by *rulings*, not ideology, character, or anything else, by which Justices should be judged.
11
posted on
02/23/2005 2:13:21 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: KidGlock
If it weren't for the "progressive" safety net under otherwise unemployable fruitbats like her, Ward Churchill, and most of the college faculties in America, Anita Hill would be wandering around downtown with a paper cup and a "will work for tenure" sign.
12
posted on
02/23/2005 2:13:32 PM PST
by
Argus
(My tagline wishes it was as good as your tagline)
To: KidGlock
Hill said she plans to focus on contemporary issues having to do with "where we are as a generation on the issues of women in political and public leadership." Does the name Condi Rice ring a bell?
"It is still important for us to look back at the election that we just went through ... and get a sense of how successful we are in influencing these elections," she said.
Oh yes, you influenced the elections. Thank you.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wouldn't it be a shame if Thomas misses the appointment by a........ Oh man, I just can't... :)
To: KidGlock
One more comment.... the people who pushed Anita are the same people who foisted Hillary on America as the Smartest woman.
15
posted on
02/23/2005 2:14:14 PM PST
by
bert
(Peace is only halftime !)
To: KidGlock
You mean you remember, Anita? Gosh. I watched your testimony, and after that performance, I'm surprised you can remember your own name from day to day.
16
posted on
02/23/2005 2:15:04 PM PST
by
RichInOC
(...somebody had to say it...why not me?)
To: KidGlock
17
posted on
02/23/2005 2:15:19 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: KidGlock
I wonder if she still commands $20K a speech like she did the days immediately following the Thomas confirmation hearings.
18
posted on
02/23/2005 2:16:10 PM PST
by
Sir_Humphrey
(The mighty oak is just a nut who held it's ground)
To: KidGlock
Anita Hill--> still a b*tch
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thank you for expressing your insignificant little opinion, Anita. Now sit down and shut up.
Agreed.
20
posted on
02/23/2005 2:16:53 PM PST
by
TChris
(Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson